Suppr超能文献

商业胶体银产品的比较分析。

Comparative Analysis of Commercial Colloidal Silver Products.

机构信息

Ames Electronic Materials Division, South Plainfield, NJ 07080, USA.

Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Science, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY, 13676, USA.

出版信息

Int J Nanomedicine. 2020 Dec 22;15:10425-10434. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S287730. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The public fear associated with the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has triggered recently a significant proliferation of supplements touted as potential cures against bacteria and viruses. Colloidal silver has particularly benefited from this rush given its empirically and scientifically documented anti-bacterial and anti-viral actions. The lack of standards in the unregulated supplements industry remains a major roadblock in evaluating the quality and consistency of marketed products or assessing the accuracy of the information provided by manufacturers. This study is the first scientifically rigorous attempt to evaluate commercial silver colloidal products offered for sale on the internet.

METHODS

Fourteen of the most popular colloidal silver products purchased from Amazon (www.amazon.com) were evaluated using state-of-the-art analytical techniques widely accepted as gold standards for investigating the properties (size, shape) and the dispersion of silver nanoparticles.

RESULTS

Commercial samples were analysed using UV-Vis, FE-SEM and AAS techniques. In general, the Ag concentration was very close to those claimed by the manufacturer. The colorless product shows no absorbance in the UV-Vis analysis. The FESEM and STEM images confirmed the conclusions of the UV-Vis analysis.

CONCLUSION

The results of this evaluation show clearly that 70% of the commercial products evaluated contain only ionic silver. Despite the evidence showing that silver nanoparticles are not present, eight of these products are promoted by the manufacturers as 'colloidal silver'. Considering the extensive scientific research showing major differences between silver ionic and silver nanoparticles in terms of mechanisms of action, efficacy and safety, it is clear that this misrepresentation impacts the consumers and must be addressed. This study serves as blueprint for a scientific protocol to be followed by manufacturers for characterizing their silver supplements.

摘要

目的

新型冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)大流行引起的公众恐慌,最近引发了大量被吹捧为潜在细菌和病毒治疗方法的补充剂的激增。鉴于胶体银具有经验证和科学记录的抗菌和抗病毒作用,因此尤其受益于这种热潮。在不受监管的补充剂行业缺乏标准仍然是评估市场产品质量和一致性或评估制造商提供的信息准确性的主要障碍。这项研究是首次对互联网上销售的商业银胶体产品进行科学严格评估的尝试。

方法

使用广泛接受的分析技术评估了从亚马逊(www.amazon.com)购买的 14 种最受欢迎的胶体银产品,这些技术被广泛认为是研究银纳米粒子性质(尺寸、形状)和分散性的黄金标准。

结果

使用 UV-Vis、FE-SEM 和 AAS 技术对商业样本进行了分析。通常,Ag 浓度非常接近制造商所宣称的浓度。无色产品在 UV-Vis 分析中没有吸收。FESEM 和 STEM 图像证实了 UV-Vis 分析的结论。

结论

该评估的结果清楚地表明,评估的 70%商业产品仅含有离子银。尽管有证据表明不存在银纳米粒子,但其中 8 种产品的制造商将其宣传为“胶体银”。考虑到广泛的科学研究表明,银离子和银纳米粒子在作用机制、功效和安全性方面存在重大差异,显然这种错误表示会影响消费者,必须加以解决。本研究为制造商制定用于表征其银补充剂的科学方案提供了蓝图。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验