Barman Bapi, Parihar Anit, Kohli Neera, Agarwal Avinash, Dwivedi Durgesh K, Kumari Gangotri
Department of Radiodiagnosis, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Department of Critical Care Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Nov;24(11):1062-1070. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23661.
To prospectively evaluate the impact of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) on etiological diagnosis and treatment of critically ill acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients.
This is a prospective observational study conducted in a general intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care center in India. Patients over 18 years old with presence of one of the objective criteria of ARF. Patients either consecutively admitted for ARF to ICU or already admitted to ICU for a different reason but later developed ARF during their hospital stay. Written informed consent in local language was obtained from next of kin.
All included patients underwent bedside CPUS including lung ultrasound (US) and transthoracic echocardiography plus targeted venous US by single investigator, blinded to clinical data. The US diagnosis of ARF etiology was shared with treating intensivist. Initial clinical diagnosis (ICD) and treatment plan (made before US) of each patient were compared with post-US clinical diagnosis and treatment plan. The changes in diagnosis and treatment up to 24 hours post-US were considered as impact of US.
Mean age of 108 included patients was 45.7 ± 20.4 years (standard deviation). The ICD was correct in 67.5% (73/108) cases, whereas the combined CPUS yielded correct etiological diagnosis in 88% (95/108) cases. Among the 108 included patients, etiological diagnosis of ARF was altered after CPUS in 40 (37%) patients, which included "diagnosis changed" in 18 (17%) and "diagnosis added" in 22 (20%). Treatment plan was changed in 39 (36%) patients after CPUS, which included surgical interventions in 17 (16%), changes in medical therapy in 12 (11%), and changes in ventilation strategy in 4 (3.5%) patients.
This study demonstrates that use of combined US approach as an initial test in ARF, improves diagnostic accuracy for identification of underlying etiology, and frequently changes clinical diagnosis and/or treatment.
Barman B, Parihar A, Kohli N, Agarwal A, Dwivedi DK, Kumari G. Impact of Bedside Combined Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound on Etiological Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Respiratory Failure in Critically Ill Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(11):1062-1070.
前瞻性评估心肺超声(CPUS)对危重症急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)患者病因诊断及治疗的影响。
这是一项在印度一家三级医疗中心的综合重症监护病房(ICU)进行的前瞻性观察性研究。纳入18岁以上符合ARF客观标准之一的患者。患者要么因ARF连续入住ICU,要么因其他原因已入住ICU,但在住院期间后来发生了ARF。已获得其近亲用当地语言签署的书面知情同意书。
所有纳入患者均接受床边CPUS检查,包括肺部超声(US)、经胸超声心动图以及由一名对临床数据不知情的研究人员进行的靶向静脉超声检查。将ARF病因的超声诊断结果告知负责治疗的重症监护医生。将每位患者的初始临床诊断(ICD)和治疗计划(超声检查前制定)与超声检查后的临床诊断和治疗计划进行比较。超声检查后24小时内诊断和治疗的变化被视为超声检查的影响。
108例纳入患者的平均年龄为45.7±20.4岁(标准差)。初始临床诊断在67.5%(73/108)的病例中正确,而联合心肺超声检查在88%(95/108)的病例中得出了正确的病因诊断。在108例纳入患者中,40例(37%)患者在心肺超声检查后ARF的病因诊断发生了改变,其中“诊断改变”18例(17%),“增加诊断”22例(20%)。心肺超声检查后39例(36%)患者的治疗计划发生了改变,其中17例(16%)进行了手术干预,12例(11%)改变了药物治疗,4例(3.5%)改变了通气策略。
本研究表明,将联合超声检查方法作为ARF的初始检查手段,可提高潜在病因识别的诊断准确性,并经常改变临床诊断和/或治疗。
Barman B, Parihar A, Kohli N, Agarwal A, Dwivedi DK, Kumari G. 床边联合心肺超声对危重症患者急性呼吸衰竭病因诊断及治疗的影响。《印度重症监护医学杂志》2020;24(11):1062 - 1070。