Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Medical School, Providence, RI, United States of America.
Department of Religious Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0244838. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244838. eCollection 2021.
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) includes a combination of focused attention (FA) and open monitoring (OM) meditation practices. The aim of this study was to assess both short- and long-term between- and within-group differences in affective disturbance among FA, OM and their combination (MBCT) in the context of a randomized controlled trial.
One hundred and four participants with mild to severe depression and anxiety were randomized into one of three 8-week interventions: MBCT (n = 32), FA (n = 36) and OM (n = 36). Outcome measures included the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS). Mixed effects regression models were used to assess differential treatment effects during treatment, post-treatment (8 weeks) and long-term (20 weeks). The Reliable Change Index (RCI) was used to translate statistical findings into clinically meaningful improvements or deteriorations.
All treatments demonstrated medium to large improvements (ds = 0.42-1.65) for almost all outcomes. While all treatments were largely comparable in their effects at post-treatment (week 8), the treatments showed meaningful differences in rapidity of response and pattern of deteriorations. FA showed the fastest rate of improvement and the fewest deteriorations on stress, anxiety and depression during treatment, but a loss of treatment-related gains and lasting deteriorations in depression at week 20. OM showed the slowest rate of improvement and lost treatment-related gains for anxiety, resulting in higher anxiety in OM at week 20 than MBCT (d = 0.40) and FA (d = 0.36), though these differences did not reach statistical significance after correcting for multiple comparisons (p's = .06). MBCT and OM showed deteriorations in stress, anxiety and depression at multiple timepoints during treatment, with lasting deteriorations in stress and depression. MBCT showed the most favorable pattern for long-term treatment of depression.
FA, OM and MBCT show different patterns of response for different dimensions of affective disturbance.
This trial is registered at (v NCT01831362); www.clinicaltrials.gov.
正念认知疗法(MBCT)包括专注注意力(FA)和开放监控(OM)冥想练习的结合。本研究的目的是在随机对照试验的背景下,评估 FA、OM 及其组合(MBCT)在短期和长期的组间和组内差异,以评估其对情感障碍的影响。
104 名患有轻度至重度抑郁和焦虑的患者被随机分为三种 8 周干预措施之一:MBCT(n=32)、FA(n=36)和 OM(n=36)。结果测量包括抑郁症状清单(IDS)和抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS)。混合效应回归模型用于评估治疗期间、治疗后(8 周)和长期(20 周)的差异治疗效果。可靠变化指数(RCI)用于将统计结果转化为临床意义上的改善或恶化。
所有治疗在治疗期间、治疗后(第 8 周)和长期(第 20 周)几乎所有结果都显示出中到高度的改善(ds=0.42-1.65)。虽然所有治疗在治疗后(第 8 周)的效果基本相似,但在治疗反应的速度和恶化的模式上存在显著差异。FA 在治疗期间在压力、焦虑和抑郁方面表现出最快的改善速度和最少的恶化,但是在第 20 周时失去了治疗相关的改善,并持续恶化。OM 在焦虑方面表现出最慢的改善速度,并失去了治疗相关的改善,因此在第 20 周时 OM 的焦虑程度高于 MBCT(d=0.40)和 FA(d=0.36),尽管在进行多次比较校正后,这些差异并未达到统计学意义(p=0.06)。MBCT 和 OM 在治疗期间的多个时间点都出现了压力、焦虑和抑郁的恶化,并且在压力和抑郁方面持续恶化。MBCT 显示出对抑郁进行长期治疗的最有利模式。
FA、OM 和 MBCT 对情感障碍的不同维度表现出不同的反应模式。
本试验在(v NCT01831362);www.clinicaltrials.gov 进行注册。