• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.保护区内广泛存在的耕地突出了保护与粮食安全之间的权衡取舍。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118.
2
One-third of cropland within protected areas could be retired in China for inferior sustainability and effects.中国三分之一的保护区耕地可能会因可持续性和效果较差而休耕。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 20;905:167084. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167084. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
3
Crop expansion and conservation priorities in tropical countries.热带国家的作物扩张和保护重点。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e51759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051759. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
4
Global cropland could be almost halved: Assessment of land saving potentials under different strategies and implications for agricultural markets.全球耕地面积可能减少近一半:不同策略下的耕地节约潜力评估及其对农业市场的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 22;17(2):e0263063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263063. eCollection 2022.
5
Dramatic cropland expansion in Myanmar following political reforms threatens biodiversity.缅甸政治改革后耕地剧增,威胁生物多样性。
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 8;8(1):16558. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34974-8.
6
The neglected role of abandoned cropland in supporting both food security and climate change mitigation.被忽视的废弃耕地在保障粮食安全和减缓气候变化方面的作用。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 28;14(1):6083. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41837-y.
7
Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.全球未来耕地扩张预测到 2050 年及对生物多样性和碳储存的直接影响。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Dec;24(12):5895-5908. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14459. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
8
A framework for identifying bird conservation priority areas in croplands at national level.一个在国家级农田中确定鸟类保护优先区域的框架。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Dec 15;324:116330. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116330. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
9
Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.在开放的农产品市场中,加强牧场管理不足以缓解对保护优先地区的压力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3199-3213. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14272. Epub 2018 May 4.
10
Biodiversity responses to agricultural practices in cropland and natural habitats.农田和自然生境中农业实践对生物多样性的响应。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Apr 20;922:171296. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171296. Epub 2024 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Synergies between speciation and conservation science yield novel insights for mitigating the biodiversity crisis of the Anthropocene.物种形成科学与保护科学之间的协同作用为缓解人类世的生物多样性危机带来了新的见解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Aug 5;122(31):e2500713122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500713122. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
2
Cropland encroachment on global protected areas and its national-level drivers.农田对全球保护区的侵占及其国家级驱动因素。
Oecologia. 2025 May 21;207(6):87. doi: 10.1007/s00442-025-05727-y.
3
Three-quarters of species' ranges have not been covered by protected areas in global borders.全球范围内,四分之三的物种分布区域未被保护区覆盖。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 17;16(1):2608. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57212-y.
4
Framework for multi-stressor physiological response evaluation in amphibian risk assessment and conservation.两栖动物风险评估与保护中多应激源生理反应评估框架
Front Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 13;12:1-16. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2024.1336747.
5
Mixed effectiveness of global protected areas in resisting habitat loss.全球保护区在抵御生境丧失方面的混合效力。
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 27;15(1):8389. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52693-9.
6
Accelerated cropland expansion into high integrity forests and protected areas globally in the 21st century.21世纪全球范围内农田加速扩张至高度完整的森林和保护区。
iScience. 2023 Mar 20;26(4):106450. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106450. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
7
Biodiversity effects of food system sustainability actions from farm to fork.从农场到餐桌的食物系统可持续性行动对生物多样性的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2113884119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2113884119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
Species ethnobotanical values rather than regional species pool determine plant diversity in agroforestry systems.物种民族植物学价值而非区域物种库决定了农林复合系统中的植物多样性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 14;11(1):23972. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-03408-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Drivers of deforestation and degradation for 28 tropical conservation landscapes.28 个热带自然保护景观的森林砍伐和退化驱动因素。
Ambio. 2021 Jan;50(1):215-228. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01325-9. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
2
A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures.保护区抵御人为压力有效性的全球评估。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23209-23215. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1908221116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
3
Long-term declines in bird populations in tropical agricultural countryside.热带农业乡村地区鸟类数量的长期下降。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 14;116(20):9903-9912. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802732116. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
4
Protected area targets post-2020.2020年后的保护区目标。
Science. 2019 Apr 19;364(6437):239-241. doi: 10.1126/science.aav6886. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
5
Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient.管理中游地带:基于全球人类改造梯度的保护重点转移。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Mar;25(3):811-826. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14549. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
6
Changes in human footprint drive changes in species extinction risk.人类足迹的变化导致物种灭绝风险的变化。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 5;9(1):4621. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07049-5.
7
Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals.整合:实现可持续发展目标的关键。
Sustain Sci. 2017;12(6):911-919. doi: 10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
8
One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure.全球三分之一的受保护土地承受着巨大的人类压力。
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):788-791. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9565.
9
Ecosystem services in European protected areas: Ambiguity in the views of scientists and managers?欧洲保护区的生态系统服务:科学家和管理者观点中的模糊性?
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 15;12(11):e0187143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187143. eCollection 2017.
10
Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification.未来耕地扩张和集约化对生物多样性的威胁。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug;1(8):1129-1135. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

保护区内广泛存在的耕地突出了保护与粮食安全之间的权衡取舍。

Pervasive cropland in protected areas highlight trade-offs between conservation and food security.

机构信息

National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, University of Maryland, Annapolis, MD 21401;

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2010121118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2010121118
PMID:33468666
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7848742/
Abstract

Global cropland expansion over the last century caused widespread habitat loss and degradation. Establishment of protected areas aims to counteract the loss of habitats and to slow species extinctions. However, many protected areas also include high levels of habitat disturbance and conversion for uses such as cropland. Understanding where and why this occurs may realign conservation priorities and inform protected area policy in light of competing priorities such as food security. Here, we use our global synthesis cropland dataset to quantify cropland in protected areas globally and assess their relationship to conservation aims and socio-environmental context. We estimate that cropland occupies 1.4 million km or 6% of global protected area. Cropland occurs across all protected area management types, with 22% occurring in strictly protected areas. Cropland inside protected areas is more prevalent in countries with higher population density, lower income inequality, and with higher agricultural suitability of protected lands. While this phenomenon is dominant in midnorthern latitudes, areas of cropland in protected areas of the tropics and subtropics may present greater trade-offs due to higher levels of both biodiversity and food insecurity. Although area-based targets are prominent in biodiversity goal-setting, our results show that they can mask persistent anthropogenic land uses detrimental to native ecosystem conservation. To ensure the long-term efficacy of protected areas, post-2020 goal setting must link aims for biodiversity and human health and improve monitoring of conservation outcomes in cropland-impacted protected areas.

摘要

上个世纪,全球耕地扩张导致了广泛的栖息地丧失和退化。建立保护区旨在抵消栖息地的丧失,并减缓物种灭绝。然而,许多保护区也包括高水平的栖息地干扰和转换,用于耕种等用途。了解这种情况发生的地点和原因,可以调整保护重点,并根据粮食安全等竞争优先事项,为保护区政策提供信息。在这里,我们利用我们的全球综合耕地数据集来量化全球保护区内的耕地,并评估其与保护目标和社会环境背景的关系。我们估计,耕地占地全球保护区的 140 万平方千米,占全球保护区的 6%。耕地出现在所有保护区管理类型中,其中 22%出现在严格保护区内。在人口密度较高、收入不平等程度较低和保护区土地农业适宜性较高的国家,保护区内的耕地更为普遍。虽然这种现象在中高纬度地区占主导地位,但由于生物多样性和粮食不安全程度较高,保护区内耕地的热带和亚热带地区可能会出现更大的权衡。尽管基于面积的目标在生物多样性目标设定中很突出,但我们的结果表明,它们可能掩盖了对原生生态系统保护有害的持续人为土地利用。为了确保保护区的长期效力,2020 年后的目标设定必须将生物多样性和人类健康目标联系起来,并改善对受耕地影响的保护区的保护成果的监测。