Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
School of Industrial Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
Brain Connect. 2021 Jun;11(5):333-348. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0881. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
Functional connectomes (FCs) have been shown to provide a reproducible individual fingerprint, which has opened the possibility of personalized medicine for neuro/psychiatric disorders. Thus, developing accurate ways to compare FCs is essential to establish associations with behavior and/or cognition at the individual level. Canonically, FCs are compared using Pearson's correlation coefficient of the entire functional connectivity profiles. Recently, it has been proposed that the use of is a more accurate way of comparing FCs, one which reflects the underlying non-Euclidean geometry of the data. Computing geodesic distance requires FCs to be positive-definite and hence invertible matrices. As this requirement depends on the functional magnetic resonance imaging scanning length and the parcellation used, it is not always attainable and sometimes a regularization procedure is required. In the present work, we show that regularization is not only an algebraic operation for making FCs invertible, but also that an optimal magnitude of regularization leads to systematically higher fingerprints. We also show evidence that optimal regularization is data set-dependent and varies as a function of condition, parcellation, scanning length, and the number of frames used to compute the FCs. We demonstrate that a universally fixed regularization does not fully uncover the potential of geodesic distance on individual fingerprinting and indeed could severely diminish it. Thus, an optimal regularization must be estimated on each data set to uncover the most differentiable across-subject and reproducible within-subject geodesic distances between FCs. The resulting pairwise geodesic distances at the optimal regularization level constitute a very reliable quantification of differences between subjects.
功能连接组 (FCs) 已被证明可以提供可重复的个体指纹,这为神经/精神疾病的个性化医疗开辟了可能性。因此,开发准确的方法来比较 FCs 对于在个体水平上建立与行为和/或认知的关联至关重要。通常,使用整个功能连接谱的 Pearson 相关系数来比较 FCs。最近,有人提出,使用 是一种更准确的比较 FCs 的方法,它反映了数据的潜在非欧几里得几何。计算测地距离需要 FCs 是正定的,因此是可逆矩阵。由于这个要求取决于功能磁共振成像扫描长度和分区,因此并不总是可行的,有时需要进行正则化处理。在本工作中,我们表明正则化不仅是使 FCs 可逆的代数操作,而且正则化的最佳幅度会导致指纹系统地更高。我们还提供了证据表明,最佳正则化是数据集依赖的,并且随着条件、分区、扫描长度和用于计算 FCs 的帧数的变化而变化。我们证明,通用固定正则化并不能充分揭示测地距离在个体指纹识别中的潜力,实际上可能会严重降低其潜力。因此,必须在每个数据集上估计最佳正则化,以揭示 FCs 之间最具可区分性的跨主体和可重复性的测地距离。在最佳正则化水平上的成对测地距离构成了主体之间差异的非常可靠的量化。