• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

德国和中国的新冠肺炎疫情:缓解策略与消除策略。

COVID-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Medical College, Yangzhou University , Yangzhou, China.

Department of Epidemiology & International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University , Bielefeld, Germany.

出版信息

Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1875601. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1875601.

DOI:10.1080/16549716.2021.1875601
PMID:33472568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7833051/
Abstract

: The COVID-19 pandemic shows variable dynamics in WHO Regions, with lowest disease burden in the Western-Pacific Region. While China has been able to rapidly eliminate transmission of SARS-CoV-2, Germany - as well as most of Europe and the Americas - is struggling with high numbers of cases and deaths. : We analyse COVID-19 epidemiology and control strategies in China and in Germany, two countries which have chosen profoundly different approaches to deal with the epidemic. : In this narrative review, we searched the literature from 1 December 2019, to 4 December 2020. : China and several neighbours (e.g. Australia, Japan, South Korea, New Zealand, Thailand) have achieved COVID-19 elimination or sustained low case numbers. This can be attributed to: (1) experience with previous coronavirus outbreaks; (2) classification of SARS-CoV-2 in the highest risk category and consequent early employment of aggressive control measures; (3) mandatory isolation of cases and contacts in institutions; (4) broad employment of modern contact tracking technology; (5) travel restrictions to prevent SARS-CoV-2 re-importation; (6) cohesive communities with varying levels of social control. : Early implementation of intense and sustained control measures is key to achieving a near normal social and economic life.

摘要

: 新冠疫情在世界卫生组织各区域表现出不同的动态,西太平洋区域的疾病负担最低。虽然中国能够迅速消除 SARS-CoV-2 的传播,但德国——以及欧洲和美洲的大部分地区——正面临着大量病例和死亡的困扰。: 我们分析了中国和德国的新冠疫情流行病学和控制策略,这两个国家选择了截然不同的方法来应对疫情。: 在这篇叙述性评论中,我们检索了 2019 年 12 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 4 日的文献。: 中国和几个邻国(如澳大利亚、日本、韩国、新西兰、泰国)已经实现了新冠疫情的消除或持续低病例数。这可以归因于:(1) 以前冠状病毒爆发的经验;(2) 将 SARS-CoV-2 归类为最高风险类别,并因此早期采取积极的控制措施;(3) 对病例和接触者进行机构隔离;(4) 广泛使用现代接触追踪技术;(5) 旅行限制以防止 SARS-CoV-2 的再次输入;(6) 具有不同程度社会控制的凝聚力社区。: 早期实施高强度和持续的控制措施是实现近乎正常的社会和经济生活的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/2d7bd80fcc7d/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/42e137cee38d/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/87034c51bdba/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/d0b5a294c711/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/2d7bd80fcc7d/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0004_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/42e137cee38d/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/87034c51bdba/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/d0b5a294c711/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0003_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2b96/7833051/2d7bd80fcc7d/ZGHA_A_1875601_F0004_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
COVID-19 in Germany and China: mitigation versus elimination strategy.德国和中国的新冠肺炎疫情:缓解策略与消除策略。
Glob Health Action. 2021 Jan 1;14(1):1875601. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.1875601.
2
The heterogeneity of the COVID-19 pandemic and national responses: an explanatory mixed-methods study.新冠疫情的异质性与各国应对措施:一项解释性混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 May 1;21(1):835. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10885-8.
3
COVID-19 Control: Can Germany Learn From China?新冠疫情防控:德国能否向中国学习?
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2020 Oct 1;9(10):432-435. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.78.
4
Association of Simulated COVID-19 Policy Responses for Social Restrictions and Lockdowns With Health-Adjusted Life-Years and Costs in Victoria, Australia.模拟澳大利亚维多利亚州新冠疫情政策对社会限制和封锁措施的反应与健康调整生命年和成本的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 30;2(7):e211749. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1749. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Policy disparities in response to the first wave of COVID-19 between China and Germany.中国和德国在应对新冠疫情第一波冲击时的政策差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Mar 25;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01424-3.
6
Pandemic modelling for regions implementing an elimination strategy.实施消除策略地区的大流行建模。
J Theor Biol. 2023 Mar 21;561:111378. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111378. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
7
The impact of travelling on the COVID-19 infection cases in Germany.旅行对德国 COVID-19 感染病例的影响。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 12;22(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07396-1.
8
Policy disparities in fighting COVID-19 among Japan, Italy, Singapore and China.抗击新冠疫情中,日本、意大利、新加坡和中国的政策差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 13;20(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01374-2.
9
Effect of different resumption strategies to flatten the potential COVID-19 outbreaks amid society reopens: a modeling study in China.不同复课策略对中国社会复课期间潜在 COVID-19 疫情的影响:一项建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 29;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10624-z.
10
Optimal timing and effectiveness of COVID-19 outbreak responses in China: a modelling study.中国 COVID-19 疫情应对的最佳时机和效果:建模研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):679. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12659-2.

引用本文的文献

1
["I hope to be informed". Effects of the Corona-Warning-App].["我希望得到通知"。新冠预警应用程序的效果]
Pravent Gesundh. 2022;17(2):128-133. doi: 10.1007/s11553-021-00854-9. Epub 2021 May 4.
2
Governance, policy, and health systems responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: a qualitative study.泰国应对 COVID-19 大流行的治理、政策和卫生系统反应:一项定性研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 22;12:1250192. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1250192. eCollection 2024.
3
Ecological comparison of six countries in two waves of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
We should learn from the Asia-Pacific responses to COVID-19.我们应该借鉴亚太地区应对新冠疫情的经验。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Dec;5:100062. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100062. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
2
Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.台湾和新西兰应对新冠疫情的卫生举措带来的潜在经验教训。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Nov;4:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
The temporal association of introducing and lifting non-pharmaceutical interventions with the time-varying reproduction number (R) of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study across 131 countries.
两次新冠疫情期间六个国家的生态比较。
Front Public Health. 2024 Feb 28;12:1277457. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1277457. eCollection 2024.
4
Knowledge, attitudes, and adherence relating to COVID-19 and its prevention measures in high-risk districts of Uganda in 2020.2020年乌干达高危地区与2019冠状病毒病及其预防措施相关的知识、态度和依从性
Front Epidemiol. 2023 May 2;3:1068097. doi: 10.3389/fepid.2023.1068097. eCollection 2023.
5
The Health Insurance Fund Participates in Controlling the Epidemic: Insights from German Experience in Dealing with the COVID-19 Pandemic.健康保险基金参与疫情防控:德国应对新冠疫情的经验 insights
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 10;16:2391-2404. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S427717. eCollection 2023.
6
The impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on premature births during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide observational study in Korea.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间非药物干预措施对早产的影响:韩国一项全国性观察性研究
Front Pediatr. 2023 Jun 27;11:1140556. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1140556. eCollection 2023.
7
Governing public health emergencies during the coronavirus disease outbreak: Lessons from four Chinese cities in the first wave.新冠疫情期间公共卫生突发事件的治理:来自四个中国城市第一波疫情的经验教训
Urban Stud. 2023 Jul;60(9):1750-1770. doi: 10.1177/00420980211049350. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
8
Projection of COVID-19 Positive Cases Considering Hybrid Immunity: Case Study in Tokyo.考虑混合免疫的新冠病毒阳性病例预测:东京的案例研究
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Mar 13;11(3):633. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11030633.
9
Field evaluation of specificity and sensitivity of a standard SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test: A prospective study at a teaching hospital in Northern Ghana.标准SARS-CoV-2抗原快速诊断检测特异性和敏感性的现场评估:加纳北部一家教学医院的前瞻性研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2021 Dec 7;1(12):e0000040. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000040. eCollection 2021.
10
Global law, policy, and governance for effective prevention and control of COVID-19: A comparative analysis of the law and policy of Pakistan, China, and Russia.全球法律、政策和治理以有效预防和控制 COVID-19:对巴基斯坦、中国和俄罗斯的法律和政策的比较分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 4;10:1035536. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1035536. eCollection 2022.
引入和取消非药物干预措施与 SARS-CoV-2 时变繁殖数(R)之间的时间关联:131 个国家的建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30785-4. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
4
Estimating the COVID-19 R number: a bargain with the devil?估算新冠病毒的R值:与魔鬼交易?
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):151-153. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30840-9. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage.新冠疫情下碎片化的卫生体系:纠正全球卫生安全与全民健康覆盖之间的错位。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):61-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32228-5. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
6
Increased Intensity Of PCR Testing Reduced COVID-19 Transmission Within Countries During The First Pandemic Wave.在第一波大流行期间,增加聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测强度降低了各国国内的 COVID-19 传播。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2021 Jan;40(1):70-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.01409. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
7
SARS-CoV-2 risk misclassification explains poor COVID-19 management.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)风险误判导致新冠病毒病(COVID-19)管理不善。
Lancet. 2020 Nov 28;396(10264):1733-1734. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32169-3. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Crowding has consequences: Prevention and management of COVID-19 in informal urban settlements.人口密集会带来后果:城市非正规住区中新冠疫情的预防与管理。
Build Environ. 2021 Jan 15;188:107472. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107472. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
9
Ct values and infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces.新型冠状病毒在物体表面的Ct值与传染性
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jun;21(6):e141. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30883-5. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
10
Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China.中国武汉近千万居民封控后新冠病毒核酸筛查。
Nat Commun. 2020 Nov 20;11(1):5917. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w.