Department of Physics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27109.
Department of Physics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Mol Biol Cell. 2021 Apr 19;32(9):903-914. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E20-11-0689. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Particle tracking in living systems requires low light exposure and short exposure times to avoid phototoxicity and photobleaching and to fully capture particle motion with high-speed imaging. Low-excitation light comes at the expense of tracking accuracy. Image restoration methods based on deep learning dramatically improve the signal-to-noise ratio in low-exposure data sets, qualitatively improving the images. However, it is not clear whether images generated by these methods yield accurate quantitative measurements such as diffusion parameters in (single) particle tracking experiments. Here, we evaluate the performance of two popular deep learning denoising software packages for particle tracking, using synthetic data sets and movies of diffusing chromatin as biological examples. With synthetic data, both supervised and unsupervised deep learning restored particle motions with high accuracy in two-dimensional data sets, whereas artifacts were introduced by the denoisers in three-dimensional data sets. Experimentally, we found that, while both supervised and unsupervised approaches improved tracking results compared with the original noisy images, supervised learning generally outperformed the unsupervised approach. We find that nicer-looking image sequences are not synonymous with more precise tracking results and highlight that deep learning algorithms can produce deceiving artifacts with extremely noisy images. Finally, we address the challenge of selecting parameters to train convolutional neural networks by implementing a frugal Bayesian optimizer that rapidly explores multidimensional parameter spaces, identifying networks yielding optimal particle tracking accuracy. Our study provides quantitative outcome measures of image restoration using deep learning. We anticipate broad application of this approach to critically evaluate artificial intelligence solutions for quantitative microscopy.
粒子在活系统中的追踪需要低光暴露和短的曝光时间,以避免光毒性和光漂白,并使用高速成像充分捕捉粒子的运动。低激发光以牺牲跟踪精度为代价。基于深度学习的图像恢复方法极大地提高了低曝光数据集的信噪比,定性地改善了图像。然而,目前尚不清楚这些方法生成的图像是否能产生准确的定量测量结果,如(单个)粒子追踪实验中的扩散参数。在这里,我们使用合成数据集和扩散染色质的电影作为生物实例,评估了两种用于粒子追踪的流行的深度学习去噪软件包的性能。使用合成数据,监督和无监督的深度学习都以高精度恢复了二维数据集中的粒子运动,而三维数据集中的去噪器会引入伪影。在实验中,我们发现,虽然监督和无监督的方法都比原始的噪声图像提高了跟踪结果,但监督学习通常优于无监督方法。我们发现,看起来更好的图像序列并不等同于更精确的跟踪结果,并强调深度学习算法可能会用非常嘈杂的图像产生欺骗性的伪影。最后,我们通过实现一个节俭的贝叶斯优化器来解决训练卷积神经网络的参数选择问题,该优化器可以快速探索多维参数空间,确定产生最佳粒子跟踪精度的网络。我们的研究提供了使用深度学习进行图像恢复的定量结果衡量标准。我们期望该方法能够广泛应用于对定量显微镜的人工智能解决方案进行严格评估。