Department of Preventive and Restorative Dentistry, Discipline of Endodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araçatuba School of Dentistry, São Paulo State University - UNESP, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil.
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102650. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102650. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
Photodynamic therapy with photosensitizers can reduce the microbial load. However, few studies have evaluated the effects of photosensitizers on the color stability of endodontically treated intraradicular dentin. This in vitro study investigated the effects of methylene blue and curcumin photosensitizers used in photodynamic therapy on the color stability of intraradicular dentin.
Sixty human incisors were divided into three experimental groups according to the photosensitizer solutions used and their concentrations: methylene blue (25 mg/L), curcumin (1000 mg/L), and curcumin (1500 mg/L). The color stability of endodontically treated intraradicular dentin was evaluated using a portable reflectance spectrophotometer before and after the samples been storage in 2 mL of the photosensitizer solutions during 5 min (n = 20). Color stability data were subjected to a normality test, and statistical analysis was performed using the one-way analysis of variance and Tukey least significant difference test (α = 0.05).
Samples treated with 25 mg/L methylene blue photosensitizer showed a higher level of color alteration than those stored in 1000 mg/L curcumin (p = .03322). However, there was no significant difference in the color alteration profiles between the samples treated with 25 mg/L methylene blue and 1500 mg/L curcumin (p = .36428). Furthermore, there was no difference in the color alteration profiles between the dentin samples immersed in 1000 mg/L and 1500 mg/L curcumin photosensitizer solutions (p = .45321).
Methylene blue and curcumin photosensitizers influenced the color stability of endodontically treated intraradicular dentin, and this color alteration exceeded the clinical acceptability threshold. Samples treated with 25 mg/L methylene blue showed the highest level of color alteration.
光动力疗法联合光敏剂可以减少微生物负荷。然而,目前很少有研究评估光敏剂对根管内牙本质颜色稳定性的影响。本体外研究旨在评估亚甲蓝和姜黄素两种光动力疗法用光敏剂对根管内牙本质颜色稳定性的影响。
将 60 个人工离体前牙根据所用光敏剂溶液及其浓度分为三组:亚甲蓝(25mg/L)、姜黄素(1000mg/L)和姜黄素(1500mg/L)。在将样本储存于 2mL 光敏剂溶液中光照 5 分钟前后,使用便携式反射分光光度计评估根管内牙本质的颜色稳定性(n=20)。采用正态性检验对颜色稳定性数据进行检验,采用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 最小显著差异检验进行统计学分析(α=0.05)。
用 25mg/L 亚甲蓝光敏剂处理的样本颜色改变程度高于用 1000mg/L 姜黄素处理的样本(p=0.03322)。但是,用 25mg/L 亚甲蓝和 1500mg/L 姜黄素处理的样本颜色改变程度无显著差异(p=0.36428)。此外,1000mg/L 和 1500mg/L 姜黄素光敏剂溶液浸泡的牙本质样本的颜色改变程度无差异(p=0.45321)。
亚甲蓝和姜黄素光敏剂影响根管内牙本质的颜色稳定性,其颜色改变程度超过临床可接受阈值。用 25mg/L 亚甲蓝处理的样本颜色改变程度最高。