• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社交媒体上的疫苗错误信息——基于主题的内容以及对波兰疫苗否认者在脸书上评论的情感分析

Vaccine misinformation on social media - topic-based content and sentiment analysis of Polish vaccine-deniers' comments on Facebook.

作者信息

Klimiuk Krzysztof, Czoska Agnieszka, Biernacka Karolina, Balwicki Łukasz

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.

Sentimenti, Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jul 3;17(7):2026-2035. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1850072. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1080/21645515.2020.1850072
PMID:33517844
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8189052/
Abstract

: Vaccinations are referred to as one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine. However, their effectiveness is also constantly denied by certain groups in society. This results in an ongoing dispute that has been gradually moving online in the last few years due to the development of technology. Our study aimed to utilize social media to identify and analyze vaccine-deniers' arguments against child vaccinations.: All public comments posted to a leading Polish vaccination opponents' Facebook page posted between 01/05/2019 and 31/07/2019 were collected and analyzed quantitatively in terms of their content according to the modified method developed by Kata (Kata, 2010). Sentiment analysis was also performed.: Out of 18,685 comments analyzed, 4,042 contained content covered by the adopted criteria: conspiracy theories (28.2%), misinformation and unreliable premises (19.9%), content related to the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations (14.0%), noncompliance with civil rights (13.2%), own experience (10.9%), morality, religion, and belief (8.5%), and alternative medicine (5.4%). There were also 1,223 pro-vaccine comments, of which 15.2% were offensive, mocking, or non-substantive. Sentiment analysis showed that comments without any arguments as well as those containing statements about alternative medicine or misinformation were more positive and less angry than comments in other topic categories.: The large amount of content in the conspiracy theory and misinformation categories may indicate that authors of such comments may be characterized by a lack of trust in the scientific achievements of medicine. These findings should be adequately addressed in vaccination campaigns.

摘要

疫苗接种被视为现代医学最伟大的成就之一。然而,社会上某些群体却不断否认其有效性。这导致了一场持续的争论,随着技术的发展,这场争论在过去几年中逐渐转移到了线上。我们的研究旨在利用社交媒体来识别和分析疫苗怀疑论者反对儿童接种疫苗的论点。

收集了2019年5月1日至2019年7月31日期间发布在波兰一个主要的疫苗接种反对者脸书页面上的所有公开评论,并根据卡塔(Kata,2010)开发的改良方法对其内容进行了定量分析。还进行了情感分析。

在分析的18685条评论中,有4042条包含符合采用标准的内容:阴谋论(28.2%)、错误信息和不可靠前提(19.9%)、与疫苗接种安全性和有效性相关的内容(14.0%)、侵犯民权(13.2%)、个人经历(10.9%)、道德、宗教和信仰(8.5%)以及替代医学(5.4%)。也有1223条支持疫苗接种的评论,其中15.2%是攻击性的、嘲讽性的或无实质内容的。情感分析表明,没有任何论据的评论以及包含替代医学或错误信息陈述的评论比其他主题类别的评论更积极、更不愤怒。

阴谋论和错误信息类别中的大量内容可能表明,此类评论的作者可能对医学的科学成就缺乏信任。这些发现应在疫苗接种宣传活动中得到充分解决。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edf/8189052/c3464ca79a9d/KHVI_A_1850072_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edf/8189052/2cc751beaf94/KHVI_A_1850072_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edf/8189052/c3464ca79a9d/KHVI_A_1850072_F0002_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edf/8189052/2cc751beaf94/KHVI_A_1850072_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2edf/8189052/c3464ca79a9d/KHVI_A_1850072_F0002_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Vaccine misinformation on social media - topic-based content and sentiment analysis of Polish vaccine-deniers' comments on Facebook.社交媒体上的疫苗错误信息——基于主题的内容以及对波兰疫苗否认者在脸书上评论的情感分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jul 3;17(7):2026-2035. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1850072. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
2
What Arguments against COVID-19 Vaccines Run on Facebook in Poland: Content Analysis of Comments.波兰脸书上反对新冠疫苗的言论有哪些:评论内容分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 May 10;9(5):481. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9050481.
3
Addressing Antivaccine Sentiment on Public Social Media Forums Through Web-Based Conversations Based on Motivational Interviewing Techniques: Observational Study.通过基于动机访谈技术的网络对话解决公共社交媒体论坛上的反疫苗情绪:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2023 Nov 14;3:e50138. doi: 10.2196/50138.
4
Social media as a platform for health-related public debates and discussions: the Polio vaccine on Facebook.社交媒体作为健康相关公众辩论和讨论的平台:脸书上的脊髓灰质炎疫苗
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2016 Nov 10;5:34. doi: 10.1186/s13584-016-0093-4. eCollection 2016.
5
Social media and HPV vaccination: Unsolicited public comments on a Facebook post by the Western Cape Department of Health provide insights into determinants of vaccine hesitancy in South Africa.社交媒体和 HPV 疫苗接种:对西开普省卫生部 Facebook 帖子的非官方公众意见提供了南非疫苗犹豫决定因素的见解。
Vaccine. 2019 Oct 8;37(43):6317-6323. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
6
Vaccine discourse in white nationalist online communication: A mixed-methods computational approach.白人至上主义者网络交流中的疫苗话语:一种混合方法计算方法。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Apr;298:114859. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114859. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
7
It's not all about autism: The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook.并非全是自闭症:脸书上反疫苗情绪的新面貌。
Vaccine. 2019 Apr 10;37(16):2216-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
8
A comparison of language use in pro- and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post.针对脸书上一篇备受瞩目的帖子,支持和反对疫苗接种评论中的语言使用比较。
Vaccine. 2016 Nov 11;34(47):5808-5814. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
9
"Vaccines for pregnant women…?! Absurd" - Mapping maternal vaccination discourse and stance on social media over six months.“给孕妇接种疫苗……?!荒谬”——对社交媒体上六个月内关于孕产妇疫苗接种的讨论和立场进行梳理。
Vaccine. 2020 Sep 29;38(42):6627-6637. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.072. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
10
COVID-19 Vaccine Fact-Checking Posts on Facebook: Observational Study.**中文译文**: 脸书上的 COVID-19 疫苗事实核查帖子:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 21;24(6):e38423. doi: 10.2196/38423.

引用本文的文献

1
Parental doubts regarding childhood vaccinations after the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study from Poland.新冠疫情后父母对儿童疫苗接种的疑虑:来自波兰的一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;13:1606815. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1606815. eCollection 2025.
2
Conspiracy narratives and vaccine hesitancy: a scoping review of prevalence, impact, and interventions.阴谋叙事与疫苗犹豫:流行状况、影响及干预措施的范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):3325. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20797-y.
3
The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic experiences on attitudes towards vaccinations: on the social, cultural and political determinants of preferred vaccination organization models in Poland.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporal trends in anti-vaccine discourse on Twitter.社交媒体上反疫苗言论的时间趋势
Vaccine. 2019 Aug 14;37(35):4867-4871. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.086. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
2
It's not all about autism: The emerging landscape of anti-vaccination sentiment on Facebook.并非全是自闭症:脸书上反疫苗情绪的新面貌。
Vaccine. 2019 Apr 10;37(16):2216-2223. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Ethical Issues in Social Media Research for Public Health.社交媒体在公共卫生研究中的伦理问题。
新型冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)大流行经历对疫苗接种态度的影响:波兰对偏好的疫苗接种组织模式的社会、文化和政治决定因素。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 19;22(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01214-7.
4
Uncovering a pseudoscience: an analysis of 'biological dentistry' Instagram posts.揭开一门伪科学:对“生物牙科”Instagram帖子的分析
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Apr 24;83:180-189. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.40486.
5
Modeling opinion polarization on social media: Application to Covid-19 vaccination hesitancy in Italy.社交媒体上意见极化的建模:在意大利对新冠疫苗犹豫态度的应用。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 2;18(10):e0291993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291993. eCollection 2023.
6
A taxonomy of anti-vaccination arguments from a systematic literature review and text modelling.从系统文献回顾和文本建模的角度对反疫苗接种论点进行分类。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Sep;7(9):1462-1480. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01644-3. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
7
Media Data and Vaccine Hesitancy: Scoping Review.媒体数据与疫苗犹豫:范围综述
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 10;2(2):e37300. doi: 10.2196/37300. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
8
The efficacy of interventions in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review.干预措施减少阴谋论信念的效果:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 5;18(4):e0280902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280902. eCollection 2023.
9
Network embedding aided vaccine skepticism detection.网络嵌入辅助疫苗怀疑论检测。
Appl Netw Sci. 2023;8(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s41109-023-00534-x. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
10
COVID-19 News Exposure and Vaccinations: A Moderated Mediation of Digital News Literacy Behavior and Vaccine Misperceptions.新冠疫情新闻接触与疫苗接种:数字新闻素养行为和疫苗误解的中介调节作用
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 3;20(1):891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010891.
Am J Public Health. 2018 Mar;108(3):343-348. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.304249. Epub 2018 Jan 18.
4
Vaccination among Polish university students. Knowledge, beliefs and anti-vaccination attitudes.波兰大学生的疫苗接种情况。知识、信仰和反疫苗态度。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Nov 2;13(11):2654-2658. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1365994. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
5
The overlooked dangers of anti-vaccination groups' social media presence.反疫苗组织在社交媒体上存在的被忽视的危险。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017 Jun 3;13(6):1-2. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2017.1283467. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
6
Barriers of Influenza Vaccination Intention and Behavior - A Systematic Review of Influenza Vaccine Hesitancy, 2005 - 2016.流感疫苗接种意愿与行为的障碍——2005 - 2016年流感疫苗犹豫情况的系统评价
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 26;12(1):e0170550. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170550. eCollection 2017.
7
A comparison of language use in pro- and anti-vaccination comments in response to a high profile Facebook post.针对脸书上一篇备受瞩目的帖子,支持和反对疫苗接种评论中的语言使用比较。
Vaccine. 2016 Nov 11;34(47):5808-5814. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.09.029. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
8
The economic value of vaccination: why prevention is wealth.疫苗接种的经济价值:为何预防就是财富。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2015 Aug 12;3. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v3.29284. eCollection 2015.
9
Comparing the quality of pro- and anti-vaccination online information: a content analysis of vaccination-related webpages.比较支持和反对疫苗接种的在线信息质量:疫苗接种相关网页的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 15;16:38. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2722-9.
10
Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial.疫苗推广中的有效信息:一项随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):e835-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2365. Epub 2014 Mar 3.