Klimiuk Krzysztof, Czoska Agnieszka, Biernacka Karolina, Balwicki Łukasz
Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Sentimenti, Poznań, Poland.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 Jul 3;17(7):2026-2035. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1850072. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
: Vaccinations are referred to as one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine. However, their effectiveness is also constantly denied by certain groups in society. This results in an ongoing dispute that has been gradually moving online in the last few years due to the development of technology. Our study aimed to utilize social media to identify and analyze vaccine-deniers' arguments against child vaccinations.: All public comments posted to a leading Polish vaccination opponents' Facebook page posted between 01/05/2019 and 31/07/2019 were collected and analyzed quantitatively in terms of their content according to the modified method developed by Kata (Kata, 2010). Sentiment analysis was also performed.: Out of 18,685 comments analyzed, 4,042 contained content covered by the adopted criteria: conspiracy theories (28.2%), misinformation and unreliable premises (19.9%), content related to the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations (14.0%), noncompliance with civil rights (13.2%), own experience (10.9%), morality, religion, and belief (8.5%), and alternative medicine (5.4%). There were also 1,223 pro-vaccine comments, of which 15.2% were offensive, mocking, or non-substantive. Sentiment analysis showed that comments without any arguments as well as those containing statements about alternative medicine or misinformation were more positive and less angry than comments in other topic categories.: The large amount of content in the conspiracy theory and misinformation categories may indicate that authors of such comments may be characterized by a lack of trust in the scientific achievements of medicine. These findings should be adequately addressed in vaccination campaigns.
疫苗接种被视为现代医学最伟大的成就之一。然而,社会上某些群体却不断否认其有效性。这导致了一场持续的争论,随着技术的发展,这场争论在过去几年中逐渐转移到了线上。我们的研究旨在利用社交媒体来识别和分析疫苗怀疑论者反对儿童接种疫苗的论点。
收集了2019年5月1日至2019年7月31日期间发布在波兰一个主要的疫苗接种反对者脸书页面上的所有公开评论,并根据卡塔(Kata,2010)开发的改良方法对其内容进行了定量分析。还进行了情感分析。
在分析的18685条评论中,有4042条包含符合采用标准的内容:阴谋论(28.2%)、错误信息和不可靠前提(19.9%)、与疫苗接种安全性和有效性相关的内容(14.0%)、侵犯民权(13.2%)、个人经历(10.9%)、道德、宗教和信仰(8.5%)以及替代医学(5.4%)。也有1223条支持疫苗接种的评论,其中15.2%是攻击性的、嘲讽性的或无实质内容的。情感分析表明,没有任何论据的评论以及包含替代医学或错误信息陈述的评论比其他主题类别的评论更积极、更不愤怒。
阴谋论和错误信息类别中的大量内容可能表明,此类评论的作者可能对医学的科学成就缺乏信任。这些发现应在疫苗接种宣传活动中得到充分解决。