• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国消费者对植物基替代牛奶饮料的需求:享乐指标增强的巴滕合成模型。

U.S. Consumer Demand for Plant-Based Milk Alternative Beverages: Hedonic Metric Augmented Barten's Synthetic Model.

作者信息

Yang Tingyi, Dharmasena Senarath

机构信息

Department of Economics, Shaanxi Normal University, No. 620, West Chang'an Avenue, Chang'an District, Xi'an 710119, China.

Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, 210T AGLS Building, 2124 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-2124, USA.

出版信息

Foods. 2021 Jan 28;10(2):265. doi: 10.3390/foods10020265.

DOI:10.3390/foods10020265
PMID:33525679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7911103/
Abstract

Consumers in the U.S. increasingly prefer plant-based milk alternative beverages (abbreviated "plant milk") to conventional milk. This study is motivated by the need to take into consideration varied nutritional and qualitative attributes in plant milk to examine consumers' purchasing behavior and estimate demand elasticities which are achieved by a new approach combing hedonic pricing model with Barten's synthetic demand system. The method of estimation is enlightened from the common practice of companies differentiating their products in multidimensions in terms of attributes. A research dataset was uniquely created by associating the products' purchase data from Nielsen Homescan dataset with exclusive first-hand nutritional data. Estimations began with creating a multidimensional hedonic attribute space based on the qualitative information of different types of plant milk and conventional milk available to consumers and then calculating the hedonic distances by Euclidean distance measurement to reparametrize Barten's synthetic demand system. Estimation results showed that the highest own-price elasticity pertained to soy milk which was -0.25. Three plant milk types had inelastic demand. Soy milk exerted substituting effects on all types of conventional milk products and vice versa. Soy milk, rice milk and almond milk entertained complementary relationships between each other and four types of conventional milk were strong substitutes within the group.

摘要

美国消费者越来越倾向于选择植物基替代乳饮料(简称为“植物奶”)而非传统牛奶。本研究的动机在于需要考虑植物奶的各种营养和质量属性,以考察消费者的购买行为,并通过将享乐定价模型与巴滕综合需求系统相结合的新方法来估计需求弹性。估计方法借鉴了企业在产品属性方面进行多维度差异化的常见做法。通过将尼尔森家庭扫描数据集的产品购买数据与独家的第一手营养数据相关联,独特地创建了一个研究数据集。估计首先基于消费者可获得的不同类型植物奶和传统牛奶的定性信息创建一个多维享乐属性空间,然后通过欧几里得距离测量计算享乐距离,以重新参数化巴滕综合需求系统。估计结果表明,豆浆的自身价格弹性最高,为-0.25。三种植物奶类型的需求缺乏弹性。豆浆对所有类型的传统奶制品都有替代作用,反之亦然。豆浆、米浆和杏仁奶之间存在互补关系,而四种传统牛奶在该组内是强替代品。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/fb64370cf8b8/foods-10-00265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/e55d1bdb6260/foods-10-00265-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/7c0961f438e8/foods-10-00265-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/55a188dce268/foods-10-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/fb64370cf8b8/foods-10-00265-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/e55d1bdb6260/foods-10-00265-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/7c0961f438e8/foods-10-00265-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/55a188dce268/foods-10-00265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0567/7911103/fb64370cf8b8/foods-10-00265-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
U.S. Consumer Demand for Plant-Based Milk Alternative Beverages: Hedonic Metric Augmented Barten's Synthetic Model.美国消费者对植物基替代牛奶饮料的需求:享乐指标增强的巴滕合成模型。
Foods. 2021 Jan 28;10(2):265. doi: 10.3390/foods10020265.
2
Consumers preferences on nutritional attributes of dairy-alternative beverages: hedonic pricing models.消费者对植物奶饮料营养属性的偏好:享乐定价模型
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Aug 24;8(10):5362-5378. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1757. eCollection 2020 Oct.
3
Drivers of choice for fluid milk versus plant-based alternatives: What are consumer perceptions of fluid milk?液态奶与植物基替代品的选择驱动因素:消费者对液态奶的认知是什么?
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Aug;100(8):6125-6138. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-12519. Epub 2017 May 24.
4
Demand for functional and nutritional enhancements in specialty milk products.对特色奶制品功能和营养强化的需求。
Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:284-94. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.105. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
5
A comparison of the quality of ultra-high-temperature milk and its plant-based analogs.超高温灭菌牛奶及其植物基类似物的质量比较。
J Dairy Sci. 2024 Dec;107(12):10299-10309. doi: 10.3168/jds.2024-25098. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
6
Consumer perception of the sustainability of dairy products and plant-based dairy alternatives.消费者对乳制品和植物性乳制品替代品可持续性的认知。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Dec;103(12):11228-11243. doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-18406. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
Identification and characterization of fluid milk consumer groups.液态奶消费者群体的识别和特征分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Oct;101(10):8860-8874. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-14855. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
8
Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile.智利软饮料、其他含糖饮料和高能量食品需求的价格弹性。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4098-x.
9
The nutritional limitations of plant-based beverages in infancy and childhood.植物基饮料在婴幼儿期和儿童期的营养限制
Nutr Hosp. 2017 Oct 24;34(5):1205-1214. doi: 10.20960/nh.931.
10
An analysis of at-home demand for ice cream in the United States.对美国家庭对冰淇淋需求的分析。
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Dec;92(12):6210-6. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2536.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumer Preference and Purchase Intention for Plant Milk: A Survey of Chinese Market.植物奶的消费者偏好与购买意愿:中国市场调查
Foods. 2025 Apr 1;14(7):1240. doi: 10.3390/foods14071240.
2
Driving Factors Influencing the Decision to Purchase Plant-Based Beverages: A Sample from Türkiye.影响购买植物基饮料决策的驱动因素:来自土耳其的样本
Foods. 2024 Jun 4;13(11):1760. doi: 10.3390/foods13111760.
3
Investigation into the Sensory Properties of Plant-Based Eggs, as Well as Acceptance, Emotional Response, and Use.基于植物的蛋类的感官特性、接受度、情感反应及用途调查

本文引用的文献

1
Consumers preferences on nutritional attributes of dairy-alternative beverages: hedonic pricing models.消费者对植物奶饮料营养属性的偏好:享乐定价模型
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Aug 24;8(10):5362-5378. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.1757. eCollection 2020 Oct.
2
Cow's Milk Substitutes for Children: Nutritional Aspects of Milk from Different Mammalian Species, Special Formula and Plant-Based Beverages.婴幼儿代乳品:不同哺乳动物来源奶、特殊配方奶及植物基饮品的营养问题。
Nutrients. 2019 Jul 27;11(8):1739. doi: 10.3390/nu11081739.
3
Nutritional and health attributes of milk and milk imitations.
Foods. 2024 May 8;13(10):1454. doi: 10.3390/foods13101454.
4
"Got Milk Alternatives?" Understanding Key Factors Determining U.S. Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Plant-Based Milk Alternatives.“有牛奶替代品吗?”了解决定美国消费者为植物基牛奶替代品支付意愿的关键因素。
Foods. 2023 Mar 17;12(6):1277. doi: 10.3390/foods12061277.
5
Proposed Nutrient Standards for Plant-Based Beverages Intended as Milk Alternatives.拟作为牛奶替代品的植物基饮料的营养标准
Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 20;8:761442. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.761442. eCollection 2021.
奶类及其仿制品的营养与健康属性。
Eur J Nutr. 2020 Feb;59(1):19-34. doi: 10.1007/s00394-019-01936-3. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
4
Own-price, cross-price, and expenditure elasticities on sugar-sweetened beverages in Guatemala.危地马拉含糖饮料的自价格、交叉价格和支出弹性。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 22;13(10):e0205931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205931. eCollection 2018.
5
How well do plant based alternatives fare nutritionally compared to cow's milk?与牛奶相比,植物性替代品在营养方面表现如何?
J Food Sci Technol. 2018 Jan;55(1):10-20. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2915-y. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Price elasticity of the demand for soft drinks, other sugar-sweetened beverages and energy dense food in Chile.智利软饮料、其他含糖饮料和高能量食品需求的价格弹性。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4098-x.
7
Plant-based milk alternatives an emerging segment of functional beverages: a review.植物基替代乳——功能性饮料的新兴细分领域:综述
J Food Sci Technol. 2016 Sep;53(9):3408-3423. doi: 10.1007/s13197-016-2328-3. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
8
A Comparison of the Nutritional Value of Cow's Milk and Nondairy Beverages.牛奶与非乳制品饮料的营养价值比较。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 May;64(5):799-805. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001380.
9
The Effect of Price and Socio-Economic Level on the Consumption of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSB): The Case of Ecuador.价格和社会经济水平对含糖饮料(SSB)消费的影响:以厄瓜多尔为例。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0152260. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152260. eCollection 2016.
10
The carbohydrate-fat problem: can we construct a healthy diet based on dietary guidelines?碳水化合物与脂肪问题:我们能否依据饮食指南构建健康饮食?
Adv Nutr. 2015 May 15;6(3):318S-25S. doi: 10.3945/an.114.006973. Print 2015 May.