• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会人口统计学特征决定了德国 Corona 接触者追踪应用程序的下载和使用情况——COSMO 调查结果。

Sociodemographic characteristics determine download and use of a Corona contact tracing app in Germany-Results of the COSMO surveys.

机构信息

Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians University München, München, Germany.

Media and Communication Science, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256660. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0256660
PMID:34473733
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8412249/
Abstract

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic mobile health applications indicating risks emerging from close contacts to infected persons have a large potential to interrupt transmission chains by automating contact tracing. Since its dispatch in Germany in June 2020 the Corona Warn App has been downloaded on 25.7 Mio smartphones by February 2021. To understand barriers to download and user fidelity in different sociodemographic groups we analysed data from five consecutive cross-sectional waves of the COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring survey from June to August 2020. Questions on the Corona Warn App included information on download, use, functionality, usability, and consequences of the app. Of the 4,960 participants (mean age 45.9 years, standard deviation 16.0, 50.4% female), 36.5% had downloaded the Corona Warn App. Adjusted analysis found that those who had downloaded the app were less likely to be female (Adjusted Odds Ratio for men 1.16 95% Confidence Interval [1.02;1.33]), less likely to be younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio for age 18 to 39 0.47 [0.32;0.59] Adjusted Odds Ratio for age 40 to 64 0.57 [0.46;0.69]), less likely to have a lower household income (AOR 0.55 [0.43;0.69]), and more likely to live in one of the Western federal states including Berlin (AOR 2.31 [1.90;2.82]). Willingness to disclose a positive test result and trust in data protection compliance of the Corona Warn App was significantly higher in older adults. Willingness to disclose also increased with higher educational degrees and income. This study supports the hypothesis of a digital divide that separates users and non-users of the Corona Warn App along a well-known health gap of education, income, and region.

摘要

在 SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间,提示与感染者密切接触风险的移动健康应用程序具有通过自动追踪接触者来中断传播链的巨大潜力。自 2020 年 6 月在德国推出以来,截至 2021 年 2 月,Corona Warn 应用程序已在 2570 万部智能手机上下载。为了了解不同社会人口群组下载和用户使用的障碍,我们分析了 2020 年 6 月至 8 月期间连续五次 COVID-19 快照监测调查的横断面数据。Corona Warn 应用程序的问题包括下载、使用、功能、可用性以及该应用程序的后果。在 4960 名参与者中(平均年龄 45.9 岁,标准差 16.0,50.4%为女性),有 36.5%下载了 Corona Warn 应用程序。调整分析发现,下载该应用程序的人女性比例较低(男性调整后的优势比为 1.16,95%置信区间[1.02;1.33]),年龄在 18 至 39 岁的调整后的优势比为 0.47(0.32;0.59),年龄在 40 至 64 岁的调整后的优势比为 0.57(0.46;0.69),家庭收入较低的调整后的优势比为 0.55(0.43;0.69),居住在包括柏林在内的西部联邦州的调整后的优势比为 2.31(1.90;2.82)。年龄较大的成年人对披露阳性检测结果的意愿和对 Corona Warn 应用程序数据保护合规性的信任明显更高。随着教育程度和收入的提高,披露的意愿也有所增加。这项研究支持了数字鸿沟的假设,即 Corona Warn 应用程序的用户和非用户沿着众所周知的教育、收入和地区健康差距而分离。

相似文献

1
Sociodemographic characteristics determine download and use of a Corona contact tracing app in Germany-Results of the COSMO surveys.社会人口统计学特征决定了德国 Corona 接触者追踪应用程序的下载和使用情况——COSMO 调查结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256660. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256660. eCollection 2021.
2
Who does or does not use the 'Corona-Warn-App' and why?谁使用或不使用“Corona-Warn-App”,为什么?
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239.
3
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
4
Barriers to the Large-Scale Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App in Germany: Survey Study.德国大规模采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用的障碍:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 2;23(3):e23362. doi: 10.2196/23362.
5
Industry and workplace characteristics associated with the downloading of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in Japan: a nation-wide cross-sectional study.与日本下载 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序相关的行业和工作场所特征:一项全国性横断面研究。
Environ Health Prev Med. 2021 Sep 21;26(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12199-021-01016-1.
6
Psychological factors shaping public responses to COVID-19 digital contact tracing technologies in Germany.塑造公众对德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪技术反应的心理因素。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 21;11(1):18716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98249-5.
7
Factors Associated With Using the COVID-19 Mobile Contact-Tracing App Among Individuals Diagnosed With SARS-CoV-2 in Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Observational Study.与在荷兰阿姆斯特丹被诊断患有 SARS-CoV-2 的个体使用 COVID-19 移动接触者追踪应用程序相关的因素:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Aug 24;10(8):e31099. doi: 10.2196/31099.
8
Attitudes Toward Mobile Apps for Pandemic Research Among Smartphone Users in Germany: National Survey.德国智能手机用户对大流行研究移动应用程序的态度:全国性调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 24;10(1):e31857. doi: 10.2196/31857.
9
Acceptability of App-Based Contact Tracing for COVID-19: Cross-Country Survey Study.基于应用程序的 COVID-19 接触者追踪的可接受性:跨国调查研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Aug 28;8(8):e19857. doi: 10.2196/19857.
10
Early Acceptability of a Mobile App for Contact Tracing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in France: National Web-Based Survey.COVID-19 大流行期间法国使用移动应用程序进行接触者追踪的早期接受度:全国性网络调查。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 19;9(7):e27768. doi: 10.2196/27768.

引用本文的文献

1
Sociodemographic factors and health digital divide among urban residents: Evidence from a population-based survey in China.城市居民的社会人口学因素与健康数字鸿沟:来自中国一项基于人群的调查的证据。
Digit Health. 2024 Aug 6;10:20552076241271812. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271812. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
2
The Saudi Community View of the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.沙特社区对医疗保健中使用人工智能的看法。
Ann Afr Med. 2024 Jul 1;23(3):343-351. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_192_23. Epub 2024 May 8.
3
Ethics of Nudging in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Necessary Return to the Principles of Shared Decision Making: A Critical Review.新冠疫情危机中助推的伦理问题以及回归共同决策原则的必要性:批判性综述
Cureus. 2024 Apr 10;16(4):e57960. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57960. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
[Developments in the digitalization of public health since 2020 : Examples from the Leibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health Bremen].2020年以来公共卫生数字化的发展:不来梅莱布尼茨数字公共卫生科学园区的实例
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):260-267. doi: 10.1007/s00103-023-03827-9. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
The Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact-Tracing App: Cluster Analysis.一款新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的采用情况:聚类分析
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Jun 20;7:e41479. doi: 10.2196/41479.
6
User Compliance With the Health Emergency and Disaster Management System: Systematic Literature Review.用户对卫生应急和灾害管理系统的遵从性:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e41168. doi: 10.2196/41168.
7
The German COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing App: A Socioeconomic Evaluation.德国 COVID-19 数字接触追踪应用:社会经济评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 2;19(21):14318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114318.
8
The Impact of Digital Contact Tracing Apps Overuse on Prevention of COVID-19: A Normative Activation Model Perspective.数字接触追踪应用过度使用对COVID-19预防的影响:规范激活模型视角
Life (Basel). 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1371. doi: 10.3390/life12091371.
9
Attitudes and perception of artificial intelligence in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey among patients.患者对医疗保健中人工智能的态度和认知:一项横断面调查
Digit Health. 2022 Aug 8;8:20552076221116772. doi: 10.1177/20552076221116772. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
10
The Association between mHealth App Use and Healthcare Satisfaction among Clients at Outpatient Clinics: A Cross-Sectional Study in Inner Mongolia, China.移动医疗应用程序的使用与内蒙古门诊客户医疗满意度的关系:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 5;19(11):6916. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116916.

本文引用的文献

1
What makes people install a COVID-19 contact-tracing app? Understanding the influence of app design and individual difference on contact-tracing app adoption intention.是什么促使人们安装新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序?了解应用程序设计和个体差异对接触者追踪应用程序采用意愿的影响。
Pervasive Mob Comput. 2021 Aug;75:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.pmcj.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Time to evaluate COVID-19 contact-tracing apps.评估新冠病毒接触者追踪应用程序的时机到了。
Nat Med. 2021 Mar;27(3):361-362. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01236-6.
3
Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app.追踪和推广使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Feb;5(2):247-255. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01044-x. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Enforcement may crowd out voluntary support for COVID-19 policies, especially where trust in government is weak and in a liberal society.执行可能会排挤人们对 COVID-19 政策的自愿支持,尤其是在政府公信力较弱和在自由社会的情况下。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 5;118(1). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2016385118.
5
Who does or does not use the 'Corona-Warn-App' and why?谁使用或不使用“Corona-Warn-App”,为什么?
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239.
6
Social Determinants of Health Mediate COVID-19 Disparities in South Florida.社会决定因素对南佛罗里达州 COVID-19 差异的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Feb;36(2):472-477. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06341-9. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
7
Mobility network models of COVID-19 explain inequities and inform reopening.新冠疫情传播的移动网络模型解释了不平等现象,并为重新开放提供了信息。
Nature. 2021 Jan;589(7840):82-87. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2923-3. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
8
Epidemiological changes on the Isle of Wight after the launch of the NHS Test and Trace programme: a preliminary analysis.NHS Test and Trace 项目推出后,怀特岛的流行病学变化:初步分析。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Dec;2(12):e658-e666. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30241-7. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
9
Concerns and Misconceptions About the Australian Government's COVIDSafe App: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.对澳大利亚政府 COVIDSafe 应用的担忧和误解:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Nov 4;6(4):e23081. doi: 10.2196/23081.
10
Racial Disparities in Incidence and Outcomes Among Patients With COVID-19.COVID-19 患者的发病和结局中的种族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2021892. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21892.