• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动态扫描路径在手动和高度自动驾驶下的研究。

Dynamic scan paths investigations under manual and highly automated driving.

机构信息

EMC (Laboratoire D'étude Des Mécanismes Cognitifs), University Lyon 2, Bron, France.

Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 12;11(1):3776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83336-4.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-83336-4
PMID:33580149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7881108/
Abstract

Active visual scanning of the scene is a key task-element in all forms of human locomotion. In the field of driving, steering (lateral control) and speed adjustments (longitudinal control) models are largely based on drivers' visual inputs. Despite knowledge gained on gaze behaviour behind the wheel, our understanding of the sequential aspects of the gaze strategies that actively sample that input remains restricted. Here, we apply scan path analysis to investigate sequences of visual scanning in manual and highly automated simulated driving. Five stereotypical visual sequences were identified under manual driving: forward polling (i.e. far road explorations), guidance, backwards polling (i.e. near road explorations), scenery and speed monitoring scan paths. Previously undocumented backwards polling scan paths were the most frequent. Under highly automated driving backwards polling scan paths relative frequency decreased, guidance scan paths relative frequency increased, and automation supervision specific scan paths appeared. The results shed new light on the gaze patterns engaged while driving. Methodological and empirical questions for future studies are discussed.

摘要

主动视觉场景扫描是所有形式人类运动的关键任务要素。在驾驶领域,转向(横向控制)和速度调整(纵向控制)模型在很大程度上基于驾驶员的视觉输入。尽管已经了解了驾驶员在驾驶时的注视行为,但我们对主动采样这些输入的注视策略的顺序方面的理解仍然有限。在这里,我们应用扫描路径分析来研究手动和高度自动化模拟驾驶中的视觉扫描序列。在手动驾驶下,确定了五个典型的视觉序列:向前轮询(即远距离道路探索)、引导、向后轮询(即近距离道路探索)、风景和速度监测扫描路径。以前未记录的向后轮询扫描路径是最常见的。在高度自动化的驾驶中,向后轮询扫描路径的相对频率降低,引导扫描路径的相对频率增加,并且出现了专门用于监督自动化的扫描路径。这些结果为驾驶时的注视模式提供了新的视角。讨论了未来研究的方法学和经验问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/63b2b724209e/41598_2021_83336_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/302c3ea92687/41598_2021_83336_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/7927b7befb45/41598_2021_83336_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/7c7dbb4364cb/41598_2021_83336_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/1b835b12fed1/41598_2021_83336_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/6e3988601c5a/41598_2021_83336_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/63b2b724209e/41598_2021_83336_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/302c3ea92687/41598_2021_83336_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/7927b7befb45/41598_2021_83336_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/7c7dbb4364cb/41598_2021_83336_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/1b835b12fed1/41598_2021_83336_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/6e3988601c5a/41598_2021_83336_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6e40/7881108/63b2b724209e/41598_2021_83336_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dynamic scan paths investigations under manual and highly automated driving.动态扫描路径在手动和高度自动驾驶下的研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 12;11(1):3776. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83336-4.
2
Looking at the Road When Driving Around Bends: Influence of Vehicle Automation and Speed.转弯驾驶时看路:车辆自动化和速度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 8;10:1699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01699. eCollection 2019.
3
Drivers use active gaze to monitor waypoints during automated driving.驾驶员在自动驾驶过程中使用主动注视来监控航点。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80126-2.
4
The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.自动驾驶中对运动控制要求对驾驶员眼动模式的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105788. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105788. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
5
Model-based estimation of the state of vehicle automation as derived from the driver's spontaneous visual strategies.基于驾驶员自发视觉策略推导的车辆自动化状态的模型估计。
J Eye Mov Res. 2021 Feb 9;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.10.
6
Highly automated driving, secondary task performance, and driver state.高度自动化驾驶、次要任务表现与驾驶员状态。
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):762-71. doi: 10.1177/0018720812442087.
7
Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.密切关注:在高度自动驾驶过程中,注视行为作为衡量自动化信任度的指标
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):509-19. doi: 10.1177/0018720815625744. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
8
Asleep at the automated wheel-Sleepiness and fatigue during highly automated driving.自动驾驶时睡着了——高度自动驾驶时的困倦和疲劳。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 May;126:70-84. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.013. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.从部分自动化到高度自动化再到手动驾驶:非驾驶相关任务、困意与接管性能之间的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:28-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
10
Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.比较真实环境和模拟环境中驾驶员在交叉口处的视觉注意力。
Appl Ergon. 2019 Oct;80:89-101. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Classification framework to identify similar visual scan paths using multiple similarity metrics.使用多种相似性度量来识别相似视觉扫描路径的分类框架。
J Eye Mov Res. 2024 Aug 9;17(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.17.3.4. eCollection 2024.
2
Hands off, brain off? A meta-analysis of neuroimaging data during active and passive driving.手放开,脑也放空?主动和被动驾驶时神经影像学数据的荟萃分析。
Brain Behav. 2023 Dec;13(12):e3272. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3272. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
Can gaze control steering?目光能否控制转向?

本文引用的文献

1
Looking at the Road When Driving Around Bends: Influence of Vehicle Automation and Speed.转弯驾驶时看路:车辆自动化和速度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 8;10:1699. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01699. eCollection 2019.
2
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors.酒后驾车:听音乐如何影响驾驶行为。
J Vis Exp. 2019 Mar 27(145). doi: 10.3791/58342.
3
The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.部分自动化对驾驶员注意力的影响:一项自然驾驶研究。
J Vis. 2023 Jul 3;23(7):12. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.7.12.
4
Egocentric Chunking in the Predictive Brain: A Cognitive Basis of Expert Performance in High-Speed Sports.预测性大脑中的自我中心组块:高速运动中专家表现的认知基础。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 12;16:822887. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.822887. eCollection 2022.
5
Gaze Strategies in Driving-An Ecological Approach.驾驶中的注视策略——一种生态学方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 14;13:821440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.821440. eCollection 2022.
Hum Factors. 2019 Dec;61(8):1261-1276. doi: 10.1177/0018720819836310. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
4
On the future of transportation in an era of automated and autonomous vehicles.论自动化和自动驾驶汽车时代的交通未来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Apr 16;116(16):7684-7691. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805770115. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Scanpath comparisons for complex visual search in a naturalistic environment.自然环境下复杂视觉搜索的扫视轨迹比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1454-1470. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1154-0.
6
Neuroergonomics of car driving: A critical meta-analysis of neuroimaging data on the human brain behind the wheel.驾驶中的神经工效学:对人类驾驶中大脑神经影像学数据的关键性元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Dec;95:464-479. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
7
Gaze doesn't always lead steering.注视并不总能引导转向。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Dec;121:268-278. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
8
Visuomotor control, eye movements, and steering: A unified approach for incorporating feedback, feedforward, and internal models.视动控制、眼球运动和转向:反馈、前馈和内模综合的统一方法。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;144(10):981-1001. doi: 10.1037/bul0000150. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
9
Does the Tempo of Music Impact Human Behavior Behind the Wheel?音乐的节奏会影响驾车时人的行为吗?
Hum Factors. 2018 Jun;60(4):556-574. doi: 10.1177/0018720818760901. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
10
A new and general approach to signal denoising and eye movement classification based on segmented linear regression.基于分段线性回归的信号去噪和眼动分类新方法
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 18;7(1):17726. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17983-x.