• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

走下查尔尼的阶梯:机器学习与计算气候科学的后 Dennard 时代

Climbing down Charney's ladder: machine learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science.

作者信息

Balaji V

机构信息

Princeton University and NOAA/Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Institute Pierre-Simon Laplace, Paris, France.

出版信息

Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200085. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0085. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

DOI:10.1098/rsta.2020.0085
PMID:33583268
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7898135/
Abstract

The advent of digital computing in the 1950s sparked a revolution in the science of weather and climate. Meteorology, long based on extrapolating patterns in space and time, gave way to computational methods in a decade of advances in numerical weather forecasting. Those same methods also gave rise to computational climate science, studying the behaviour of those same numerical equations over intervals much longer than weather events, and changes in external boundary conditions. Several subsequent decades of exponential growth in computational power have brought us to the present day, where models ever grow in resolution and complexity, capable of mastery of many small-scale phenomena with global repercussions, and ever more intricate feedbacks in the Earth system. The current juncture in computing, seven decades later, heralds an end to what is called Dennard scaling, the physics behind ever smaller computational units and ever faster arithmetic. This is prompting a fundamental change in our approach to the simulation of weather and climate, potentially as revolutionary as that wrought by John von Neumann in the 1950s. One approach could return us to an earlier era of pattern recognition and extrapolation, this time aided by computational power. Another approach could lead us to insights that continue to be expressed in mathematical equations. In either approach, or any synthesis of those, it is clearly no longer the steady march of the last few decades, continuing to add detail to ever more elaborate models. In this prospectus, we attempt to show the outlines of how this may unfold in the coming decades, a new harnessing of physical knowledge, computation and data. This article is part of the theme issue 'Machine learning for weather and climate modelling'.

摘要

20世纪50年代数字计算技术的出现引发了气象与气候科学领域的一场革命。长期以来基于时空模式外推的气象学,在数值天气预报取得进展的十年间,让位于计算方法。同样这些方法还催生了计算气候科学,该学科研究那些数值方程在比天气事件长得多的时间间隔内的行为,以及外部边界条件的变化。随后几十年计算能力呈指数级增长,将我们带到了今天,此时模型的分辨率和复杂度不断提高,能够掌握许多具有全球影响的小尺度现象,以及地球系统中越来越复杂的反馈。七十年后的当前计算节点预示着所谓的 Dennard 缩放比例的终结,Dennard 缩放比例是更小计算单元和更快运算背后的物理原理。这正促使我们在天气和气候模拟方法上发生根本性变革,其变革程度可能与20世纪50年代约翰·冯·诺依曼带来的变革一样具有革命性。一种方法可能会让我们回到模式识别和外推的早期时代,这次借助计算能力的辅助。另一种方法可能会引导我们获得仍用数学方程表达的见解。无论采用哪种方法,或者是两者的任何综合,显然都不再是过去几十年那种持续为越来越精细的模型添加细节的稳步发展。在本展望中,我们试图勾勒出未来几十年这可能如何展开,即对物理知识、计算和数据的新应用。本文是“用于天气和气候建模的机器学习”主题特刊的一部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/f22702869325/rsta20200085-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/81d03220a059/rsta20200085-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/dd12dcbbae33/rsta20200085-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/f22702869325/rsta20200085-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/81d03220a059/rsta20200085-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/dd12dcbbae33/rsta20200085-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4da/7898135/f22702869325/rsta20200085-g3.jpg

相似文献

1
Climbing down Charney's ladder: machine learning and the post-Dennard era of computational climate science.走下查尔尼的阶梯:机器学习与计算气候科学的后 Dennard 时代
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200085. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0085. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
2
Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling.物理信息机器学习:天气和气候建模案例研究。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200093. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0093. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Can deep learning beat numerical weather prediction?深度学习能打败数值天气预报吗?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200097. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0097. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
The digital revolution of Earth-system science.地球系统科学的数字革命。
Nat Comput Sci. 2021 Feb;1(2):104-113. doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00023-0. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
5
Neural general circulation models for weather and climate.神经气象气候通用循环模型。
Nature. 2024 Aug;632(8027):1060-1066. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07744-y. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Machine learning for weather and climate are worlds apart.用于天气和气候的机器学习有着天壤之别。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200098. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0098. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
7
Deep learning for post-processing ensemble weather forecasts.用于后处理集合天气预报的深度学习
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200092. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0092. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
8
Domain-driven models yield better predictions at lower cost than reservoir computers in Lorenz systems.相比于 Lorenz 系统中的储层计算机,域驱动模型以更低的成本产生更好的预测结果。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200246. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0246. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
9
Learning earth system models from observations: machine learning or data assimilation?从观测中学习地球系统模型:机器学习还是数据同化?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Apr 5;379(2194):20200089. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0089. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
10
Machine learning-accelerated computational fluid dynamics.机器学习加速的计算流体力学。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101784118.

引用本文的文献

1
Are general circulation models obsolete?一般环流模式是否已过时?
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov 22;119(47):e2202075119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2202075119. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

本文引用的文献

1
The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change.理解和估计气候变化的科学挑战。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Dec 3;116(49):24390-24395. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906691116.
2
Deep learning for multi-year ENSO forecasts.深度学习在多年厄尔尼诺-南方涛动预测中的应用。
Nature. 2019 Sep;573(7775):568-572. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1559-7. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
3
Assessing the scales in numerical weather and climate predictions: will exascale be the rescue?评估数值天气预报和气候预测中的尺度:是否需要超级计算来拯救?
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2019 Apr 8;377(2142):20180148. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0148.
4
Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models.深度学习在气候模型中表示次网格过程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Sep 25;115(39):9684-9689. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810286115. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
5
Model-Free Prediction of Large Spatiotemporally Chaotic Systems from Data: A Reservoir Computing Approach.基于数据的大时空混沌系统无模型预测:一种回声状态网络方法。
Phys Rev Lett. 2018 Jan 12;120(2):024102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.024102.
6
Discovering governing equations from data by sparse identification of nonlinear dynamical systems.通过非线性动力系统的稀疏识别从数据中发现控制方程。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 12;113(15):3932-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517384113. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
7
Modelling: Build imprecise supercomputers.建模:构建不精确的超级计算机。
Nature. 2015 Oct 1;526(7571):32-3. doi: 10.1038/526032a.
8
The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction.数值天气预报的悄然变革。
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):47-55. doi: 10.1038/nature14956.
9
Limits on fundamental limits to computation.计算基本极限的限制。
Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):147-54. doi: 10.1038/nature13570.
10
Inexactness and a future of computing.不精确性与未来的计算。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2014 Jun 28;372(2018):20130281. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0281.