The Behavioural Insights Team (BIT), 2nd Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP, UK.
Institute of Global Health Innovation, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London , 10th Floor Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Building, St Mary's Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10356-0.
The use of face masks remains contentious, with international variation in practice. Their prevalence in the UK, is likely to increase due to new legislation. Clear information regarding the appropriate use of masks is needed, to ensure compliance with policies to reduce transmission of COVID-19. We aimed to assess the impact of visual representations of guidance, or infographics, upon the knowledge of appropriate face mask usage in a representative UK cohort.
Adult patients were recruited to this randomised internet-based questionnaire study during the 12-14 May 2020 from across the UK. Respondents viewed one of five public health stimuli regarding the use of face masks, or no stimulus. The groups accessed aids by the European Centre for Disease Control (EUCDC), World Health Organisation (WHO), Singaporean Ministry of Health (SMOH), text from the UK government (UK Gov), or an infographic designed by the Behavioural Insights Team (BIT). The primary outcome was to evaluate the effect of each infographic upon participants' recall of face mask technique, sentiments and willingness to wear a face covering. Secondary outcomes included the effect of symptomology and socio-demographic factors.
4099 respondents were randomised (1009 control, 628 EUCDC, 526 WHO, 639 SMOH, 661 UKGOV and 606 BIT). Stimuli from the WHO, SMOH and BIT demonstrated significantly higher average recall scores compared to the controls (7.40 v. 7.38 v. 7.34 v. 6.97, P < 0.001). BIT's stimulus led to the highest confidence about mask-wearing (87%). Only 48.2% of the cohort felt stimuli reduced anxiety about COVID-19. However, willingness to use a mask was high, (range 84 to 88%).
To ensure the appropriate use of masks, as mandated by UK law, guidance must provide sufficient information, yet remain understandable. Infographics can aid the recall of correct mask techniques by highlighting salient steps and reducing cognitive burden. They have also demonstrated greater trustworthiness than text-only guidance. The effect of infographics upon COVID-19-related anxiety was poor, and they should be further developed to address this sentiment. A willingness to wear face masks has, however, been demonstrated.
口罩的使用仍然存在争议,国际实践存在差异。由于新的立法,口罩在英国的使用可能会增加。为了确保遵守减少 COVID-19 传播的政策,需要提供有关口罩正确使用的明确信息。我们旨在评估视觉表示(或信息图)对英国代表性队列中适当口罩使用知识的影响。
在 2020 年 5 月 12 日至 14 日期间,通过互联网从英国各地招募成年患者参加这项随机问卷调查研究。受访者查看了五个公共卫生刺激因素之一,涉及口罩的使用,或者没有刺激因素。这些组访问了欧洲疾病预防控制中心(EUCDC)、世界卫生组织(WHO)、新加坡卫生部(SMOH)、英国政府(UK Gov)的文本或行为洞察团队(BIT)设计的信息图。主要结果是评估每个信息图对参与者回忆口罩技术、情绪和佩戴口罩意愿的影响。次要结果包括症状和社会人口因素的影响。
共有 4099 名受访者被随机分配(对照组 1009 名,EUCDC 组 628 名,WHO 组 526 名,SMOH 组 639 名,UKGov 组 661 名,BIT 组 606 名)。与对照组相比,来自 WHO、SMOH 和 BIT 的刺激因素的平均回忆分数明显更高(7.40 v. 7.38 v. 7.34 v. 6.97,P<0.001)。BIT 的刺激因素导致对口罩佩戴的最高信心(87%)。只有 48.2%的队列感到刺激措施减轻了对 COVID-19 的焦虑。然而,使用口罩的意愿很高(范围为 84%至 88%)。
为了确保按照英国法律适当使用口罩,指导必须提供足够的信息,但仍需易于理解。信息图可以通过突出显示重要步骤和减轻认知负担来帮助回忆正确的口罩技术。它们也比仅文本指导更值得信赖。信息图对 COVID-19 相关焦虑的影响较差,应该进一步开发以解决这种情绪。然而,已经表现出愿意佩戴口罩。