Wang Cuiyan, Chudzicka-Czupała Agata, Grabowski Damian, Pan Riyu, Adamus Katarzyna, Wan Xiaoyang, Hetnał Mateusz, Tan Yilin, Olszewska-Guizzo Agnieszka, Xu Linkang, McIntyre Roger S, Quek Jessica, Ho Roger, Ho Cyrus
Faculty of Education, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Huaibei Normal University, Huaibei, China.
Faculty of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Katowice, Poland.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 9;11:569981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.569981. eCollection 2020.
The physical and mental health of citizens living in a country that encouraged face masks (China) and discouraged face masks (Poland) during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic remained unknown. We conducted a cross-country study to compare the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Poles and Chinese. This study aimed to compare the levels of psychological impact of pandemic and levels of anxiety and depression between China and Poland.
The survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms, contact history, and precautionary measures. The psychological impact was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21). The chi-squared test was used to analyze the differences in categorical variables between the two populations. Linear regression was used to calculate the bivariate associations between independents variables (e.g., physical symptoms and precautionary measures) and dependent variables (e.g., mental health outcomes).
This study included a total of 2,266 respondents from both countries (1,056 Poles and 1,210 Chinese). There were significantly less Polish respondents who wore face masks (Poles: 35.0%; Chinese: 96.8% p < 0.001). Significantly more Polish respondents reported physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection (p < 0.001), recent medical consultation (p < 0.01), recent COVID-19 testing (p < 0.001), and hospitalization (p < 0.01). Furthermore, Polish respondents had significantly higher levels of anxiety, depression and stress (p < 0.001) than Chinese. The mean IES-R scores of Poland and China were above the cut-off for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. Besides precautionary measures, unemployment, retirement, physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection, recent medical consultation or COVID-19 testing, and long daily duration of home confinement were risk factors for PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, or stress for Polish respondents.
Use of face masks at the community level may safeguard better physical and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. There is a need of health education with scientific information from Polish health authority on the proper use of face masks and reduce social stigma. This study was limited by the respondent sampling method that had compromised the representativeness of samples.
在新冠疫情初期,生活在鼓励佩戴口罩的国家(中国)和不鼓励佩戴口罩的国家(波兰)的公民的身心健康状况尚不清楚。我们进行了一项跨国研究,以比较新冠疫情对波兰人和中国人的心理影响。本研究旨在比较中国和波兰在疫情心理影响水平以及焦虑和抑郁水平方面的差异。
该调查收集了有关人口统计学数据、身体症状、接触史和预防措施的信息。使用事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)评估心理影响,使用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表(DASS-21)评估心理健康状况。采用卡方检验分析两国人群分类变量的差异。使用线性回归计算自变量(如身体症状和预防措施)与因变量(如心理健康结果)之间的双变量关联。
本研究共纳入来自两国的2266名受访者(1056名波兰人,1210名中国人)。佩戴口罩的波兰受访者明显较少(波兰人:35.0%;中国人:96.8%,p<0.001)。报告有类似新冠感染身体症状的波兰受访者明显更多(p<0.001),近期就医的波兰受访者更多(p<0.01),近期进行新冠检测的波兰受访者更多(p<0.001),住院的波兰受访者更多(p<0.01)。此外,波兰受访者的焦虑、抑郁和压力水平明显高于中国人(p<0.001)。波兰和中国的IES-R平均得分均高于创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的临界值。除预防措施外,失业、退休、类似新冠感染的身体症状、近期就医或新冠检测以及每天长时间居家隔离是波兰受访者出现PTSD症状、焦虑、抑郁或压力的风险因素。
在新冠疫情期间,社区层面佩戴口罩可能有助于更好地保障身心健康。波兰卫生当局需要开展健康教育,提供关于正确佩戴口罩的科学信息,并减少社会污名。本研究受到受访者抽样方法的限制,该方法影响了样本的代表性。