Suppr超能文献

电子烟液购买情况与实验性烟草市场中工作场所限制的关系。

E-liquid purchase as a function of workplace restriction in the experimental tobacco marketplace.

机构信息

Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022 Jun;30(3):371-377. doi: 10.1037/pha0000444. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

E-cigarette use is prohibited in most smoke-free environments. The effect of this policy on tobacco consumption could be examined using the Experimental Tobacco Marketplace (ETM). The ETM allows observation of policy on smokers' purchasing behavior under conditions that simulate "real-world" circumstances. A within-subject design was used to evaluate the effect of workplace policy (Vaping Allowed vs. Not Allowed) and nicotine concentration (24 mg/mL vs. 0 mg/mL) on tobacco product consumption. Participants (n = 31) completed one sampling and two ETM/workplace sessions per week for 2 weeks. During the sampling session, participants were given an e-cigarette with a 2-day supply of a commercially available e-liquid of their preferred flavor. Before purchasing, participants were informed whether e-cigarette use was permitted. During the four ETM sessions, participants purchased for the following 24 hr, including the 4-hr work shift that started immediately after buying products in the ETM. The workplace session consisted of data entry tasks in a mock office environment. Participants could use any purchased tobacco products during two 15-min breaks. Condition order was counterbalanced. The results show that permitting E-cigarette use in the workplace increased e-liquid purchase on average, but nicotine concentration had no effect on e-liquid demand. Cigarette demand was unaltered across conditions. The present study suggests that allowing e-cigarette use in the workplace would increase demand for e-liquid regardless of nicotine strength. However, it would not change conventional cigarette demand. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

电子烟在大多数禁烟环境中都是禁止使用的。可以通过实验性烟草市场(ETM)来检验这一政策对烟草消费的影响。ETM 允许在模拟“真实世界”情况下观察政策对吸烟者购买行为的影响。采用被试内设计来评估工作场所政策(允许电子烟使用与不允许电子烟使用)和尼古丁浓度(24 毫克/毫升与 0 毫克/毫升)对烟草制品消费的影响。参与者(n = 31)每周完成一次抽样和两次 ETM/工作场所测试,为期两周。在抽样测试中,参与者获得了一支电子烟,其中包含两天供应的他们所喜欢口味的商业电子烟液。在购买之前,参与者被告知是否允许使用电子烟。在四个 ETM 测试中,参与者购买了可在 24 小时内使用的产品,包括购买 ETM 产品后立即开始的 4 小时工作轮班。工作场所测试包括在模拟办公室环境中完成数据输入任务。参与者可以在两个 15 分钟的休息时间内使用任何购买的烟草制品。条件顺序是平衡的。结果表明,允许在工作场所使用电子烟会增加电子烟液的平均购买量,但尼古丁浓度对电子烟液的需求没有影响。无论条件如何,香烟的需求都没有改变。本研究表明,允许在工作场所使用电子烟将增加电子烟液的需求,无论尼古丁强度如何。然而,它不会改变传统香烟的需求。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
The R package : Behavioral Economic Easy Demand.R软件包:行为经济学简易需求
Perspect Behav Sci. 2018 Dec 12;42(1):163-180. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00187-7. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
A Randomized Trial of E-Cigarettes versus Nicotine-Replacement Therapy.一项电子烟与尼古丁替代疗法的随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Feb 14;380(7):629-637. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808779. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
9
Quitting Smoking Among Adults - United States, 2000-2015.成年人戒烟 - 美国,2000-2015 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2017 Jan 6;65(52):1457-1464. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6552a1.
10
Electronic cigarettes as smoking cessation tool: are we there?电子烟作为戒烟工具:我们做到了吗?
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2017 Mar;23(2):111-116. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000348.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验