Raval Yash S, Flurin Laure, Mohamed Abdelrhman, Greenwood-Quaintance Kerryl E, Beyenal Haluk, Patel Robin
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
The Gene and Linda Voiland School of Chemical Engineering and Bioengineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021 May 1;65(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.01966-20. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Hydrogen peroxide (HO) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) are biocides used for cleaning and debriding chronic wound infections, which often harbor drug resistant bacteria. Here, we evaluated the activity of HO and HOCl against 27 isolates of eight bacterial species involved in wound infections. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum biofilm bactericidal concentrations (MBBCs) were measured. When compared to their respective MICs, MBBCs of isolates exposed to HO were 16- to 1,024-fold higher and those exposed to HOCl were 2- to 4-fold higher. We evaluated selection of resistance after exposure of and biofilms to 10 iterations of electrochemically generated HOCl or HO delivered using electrochemical scaffolds (e-scaffolds), observing no decrease in anti-biofilm effects with serial exposure to e-scaffold-generated HO or HOCl. 24-hour exposure to HO-generating e-scaffolds consistently decreased colony forming units (CFUs) of and biofilms by ∼5.0-log and ∼4.78-log through 10 iterations of exposure, respectively. 4-hour exposure to HOCl-generating e-scaffolds consistently decreased CFUs of biofilms by ∼4.9-log, and 1-hour exposure to HOCl-generating e-scaffolds consistently decreased CFUs of biofilms by ∼1.57-log These results suggest that HOCl has similar activity against planktonic and biofilm bacteria, whereas the activity of HO is less against biofilm than planktonic bacteria, and that repeat exposure to either biocide, generated electrochemically under the experimental conditions studied, does not lessen antibiofilm effects.
过氧化氢(HO)和次氯酸(HOCl)是用于清洁和清创慢性伤口感染的杀菌剂,这些伤口通常含有耐药细菌。在此,我们评估了HO和HOCl对涉及伤口感染的8种细菌的27个分离株的活性。测量了最低抑菌浓度(MIC)和最低生物膜杀菌浓度(MBBC)。与各自的MIC相比,暴露于HO的分离株的MBBC高16至1024倍,暴露于HOCl的分离株的MBBC高2至4倍。我们评估了在将和生物膜暴露于电化学产生的HOCl或使用电化学支架(电子支架)递送的HO 10次迭代后耐药性的选择,观察到连续暴露于电子支架产生的HO或HOCl后抗生物膜效果没有降低。通过10次暴露迭代,暴露于产生HO的电子支架24小时分别使和生物膜的菌落形成单位(CFU)持续降低约5.0对数和约4.78对数。暴露于产生HOCl的电子支架4小时使生物膜的CFU持续降低约4.9对数,暴露于产生HOCl的电子支架1小时使生物膜的CFU持续降低约1.57对数。这些结果表明,HOCl对浮游细菌和生物膜细菌具有相似的活性,而HO对生物膜的活性比对浮游细菌的活性小,并且在研究的实验条件下,重复暴露于通过电化学产生的任何一种杀菌剂都不会减弱抗生物膜效果。