Suppr超能文献

从数据到原因之三:一般交叉滞后面板模型(GCLM)的贝叶斯先验

From Data to Causes III: Bayesian Priors for General Cross-Lagged Panel Models (GCLM).

作者信息

Zyphur Michael J, Hamaker Ellen L, Tay Louis, Voelkle Manuel, Preacher Kristopher J, Zhang Zhen, Allison Paul D, Pierides Dean C, Koval Peter, Diener Edward F

机构信息

Department of Management and Marketing, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 15;12:612251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.612251. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

This article describes some potential uses of Bayesian estimation for time-series and panel data models by incorporating information from prior probabilities (i.e., priors) in addition to observed data. Drawing on econometrics and other literatures we illustrate the use of informative "shrinkage" or "small variance" priors (including so-called "Minnesota priors") while extending prior work on the general cross-lagged panel model (GCLM). Using a panel dataset of national income and subjective well-being (SWB) we describe three key benefits of these priors. First, they shrink parameter estimates toward zero or toward each other for time-varying parameters, which lends additional support for an income → SWB effect that is not supported with maximum likelihood (ML). This is useful because, second, these priors increase model parsimony and the stability of estimates (keeping them within more reasonable bounds) and thus improve out-of-sample predictions and interpretability, which means estimated effect should also be more trustworthy than under ML. Third, these priors allow estimating otherwise under-identified models under ML, allowing higher-order lagged effects and time-varying parameters that are otherwise impossible to estimate using observed data alone. In conclusion we note some of the responsibilities that come with the use of priors which, departing from typical commentaries on their scientific applications, we describe as involving reflection on how best to apply modeling tools to address matters of worldly concern.

摘要

本文描述了贝叶斯估计在时间序列和面板数据模型中的一些潜在用途,即除了观测数据之外,还纳入来自先验概率(即先验)的信息。借鉴计量经济学和其他文献,我们阐述了信息性“收缩”或“小方差”先验(包括所谓的“明尼苏达先验”)的使用,同时扩展了关于一般交叉滞后面板模型(GCLM)的先前研究。使用国民收入和主观幸福感(SWB)的面板数据集,我们描述了这些先验的三个关键益处。首先,对于随时间变化的参数,它们会将参数估计值向零或相互靠拢,这为收入→主观幸福感效应提供了额外支持,而最大似然估计(ML)并不支持这一效应。这很有用,因为其次,这些先验增加了模型的简约性和估计的稳定性(将它们保持在更合理的范围内),从而改善了样本外预测和可解释性,这意味着估计效应应该也比最大似然估计下更值得信赖。第三,这些先验允许在最大似然估计下估计其他未识别的模型,允许估计高阶滞后效应和随时间变化的参数,而仅使用观测数据是无法估计这些参数的。总之,我们指出了使用先验所带来的一些责任,与关于其科学应用的典型评论不同,我们将其描述为涉及思考如何最好地应用建模工具来解决实际问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8107/7917264/b6896e00f356/fpsyg-12-612251-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验