• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于变压器的深度学习对电动汽车消费者体验的主题分类

Topic classification of electric vehicle consumer experiences with transformer-based deep learning.

作者信息

Ha Sooji, Marchetto Daniel J, Dharur Sameer, Asensio Omar I

机构信息

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA.

School of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.

出版信息

Patterns (N Y). 2021 Jan 22;2(2):100195. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195. eCollection 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195
PMID:33659911
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7892356/
Abstract

The transportation sector is a major contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and is a driver of adverse health effects globally. Increasingly, government policies have promoted the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) as a solution to mitigate GHG emissions. However, government analysts have failed to fully utilize consumer data in decisions related to charging infrastructure. This is because a large share of EV data is unstructured text, which presents challenges for data discovery. In this article, we deploy advances in transformer-based deep learning to discover topics of attention in a nationally representative sample of user reviews. We report classification accuracies greater than 91% (F1 scores of 0.83), outperforming previously leading algorithms in this domain. We describe applications of these deep learning models for public policy analysis and large-scale implementation. This capability can boost intelligence for the EV charging market, which is expected to grow to US$27.6 billion by 2027.

摘要

交通运输部门是温室气体(GHG)排放的主要贡献者,也是全球不良健康影响的驱动因素。政府政策越来越多地推动采用电动汽车(EV)作为减少温室气体排放的解决方案。然而,政府分析人员在与充电基础设施相关的决策中未能充分利用消费者数据。这是因为很大一部分电动汽车数据是无结构文本,这给数据发现带来了挑战。在本文中,我们运用基于Transformer的深度学习进展,在具有全国代表性的用户评论样本中发现关注的主题。我们报告的分类准确率超过91%(F1分数为0.83),优于该领域以前领先的算法。我们描述了这些深度学习模型在公共政策分析和大规模实施中的应用。这种能力可以提升电动汽车充电市场的智能水平,预计到2027年该市场规模将增长至276亿美元。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/2da454e3f141/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/6c3b665aae5c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/a125fa080d04/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/2da454e3f141/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/6c3b665aae5c/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/a125fa080d04/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ca12/7892356/2da454e3f141/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Topic classification of electric vehicle consumer experiences with transformer-based deep learning.基于变压器的深度学习对电动汽车消费者体验的主题分类
Patterns (N Y). 2021 Jan 22;2(2):100195. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2020.100195. eCollection 2021 Feb 12.
2
An assessment of electric vehicles: technology, infrastructure requirements, greenhouse-gas emissions, petroleum use, material use, lifetime cost, consumer acceptance and policy initiatives.电动汽车评估:技术、基础设施需求、温室气体排放、石油使用、材料使用、生命周期成本、消费者接受度和政策举措。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2013 Dec 2;372(2006):20120325. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2012.0325. Print 2014 Jan 13.
3
Public Preference for Electric Vehicle Incentive Policies in China: A Conjoint Analysis.公众对中国电动汽车激励政策的偏好:联合分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 2;17(1):318. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010318.
4
Marginal Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Ontario's Electricity System and the Implications of Electric Vehicle Charging.安大略省电力系统的边际温室气体排放及其对电动汽车充电的影响。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Jul 2;53(13):7903-7912. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01519. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
Transport oil product consumption and GHG emission reduction potential in China: An electric vehicle-based scenario analysis.中国油品运输领域产品能耗及温室气体减排潜力:基于电动汽车的情景分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 16;14(9):e0222448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222448. eCollection 2019.
6
A Review on Electric and Fuel Cell Vehicle Anatomy, Technology Evolution and Policy Drivers towards EVs and FCEVs Market Propagation.电动和燃料电池汽车解剖结构综述、技术发展以及推动电动汽车和燃料电池汽车市场普及的政策驱动因素。
Chem Rec. 2022 Feb;22(2):e202100235. doi: 10.1002/tcr.202100235. Epub 2021 Nov 19.
7
Predictive modeling of battery degradation and greenhouse gas emissions from U.S. state-level electric vehicle operation.基于美国各州电动汽车运行数据的电池退化和温室气体排放预测模型。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 21;9(1):2429. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04826-0.
8
Barriers to adoption of electric vehicles in Texas.德克萨斯州电动汽车普及的障碍。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Mar;31(11):16735-16745. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32337-7. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
9
Comparing costs and climate impacts of various electric vehicle charging systems across the United States.比较美国各地各种电动汽车充电系统的成本和气候影响。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 1;15(1):4680. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-49157-5.
10
Coordinated EV adoption: double-digit reductions in emissions and fuel use for $40/vehicle-year.协调电动汽车的推广应用:排放量和燃料使用量减少两位数,每辆车每年节省 40 美元。
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Sep 17;47(18):10703-7. doi: 10.1021/es4016926. Epub 2013 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilabel classification for defect prediction in software engineering.软件工程中缺陷预测的多标签分类
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 13;15(1):8739. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93242-8.
2
Widespread use of National Academies consensus reports by the American public.美国公众对美国国家科学院共识报告的广泛使用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 1;119(9). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2107760119.
3
Electric vehicle charging stations in the workplace with high-resolution data from casual and habitual users.工作场所的电动汽车充电站,拥有来自偶然和习惯性用户的高分辨率数据。

本文引用的文献

1
Aggregating and Predicting Sequence Labels from Crowd Annotations.从群体注释中聚合和预测序列标签
Proc Conf Assoc Comput Linguist Meet. 2017;2017:299-309. doi: 10.18653/v1/P17-1028.
2
Understanding the impact of electric vehicle driving experience on range anxiety.了解电动汽车驾驶体验对里程焦虑的影响。
Hum Factors. 2015 Feb;57(1):177-87. doi: 10.1177/0018720814546372.
3
Long short-term memory.长短期记忆
Sci Data. 2021 Jul 7;8(1):168. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00956-1.
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.
4
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.分类数据观察者一致性的测量。
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74.