Biomedical Engineering Department University of Connecticut Storrs CT.
Defibtech, LLC Guilford CT.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Mar 16;10(6):e019065. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019065. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
Background Because chest compressions induce artifacts in the ECG, current automated external defibrillators instruct the user to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) while an automated rhythm analysis is performed. It has been shown that minimizing interruptions in CPR increases the chance of survival. Methods and Results The objective of this study was to apply a deep-learning algorithm using convolutional layers, residual networks, and bidirectional long short-term memory method to classify shockable versus nonshockable rhythms in the presence and absence of CPR artifact. Forty subjects' data from Physionet with 1131 shockable and 2741 nonshockable samples contaminated with 43 different CPR artifacts that were acquired from a commercial automated external defibrillator during asystole were used. We had separate data as train and test sets. Using our deep neural network model, the sensitivity and specificity of the shock versus no-shock decision for the entire data set over the 4-fold cross-validation sets were 95.21% and 86.03%, respectively. This result was based on the training and testing of the model using ECG data in both the presence and the absence of CPR artifact. For ECG without CPR artifact, the sensitivity was 99.04% and the specificity was 95.2%. A sensitivity of 94.21% and a specificity of 86.14% were obtained for ECG with CPR artifact. In addition to 4-fold cross-validation sets, we also examined leave-one-subject-out validation. The sensitivity and specificity for the case of leave-one-subject-out validation were 92.71% and 97.6%, respectively. Conclusions The proposed trained model can make shock versus nonshock decision in automated external defibrillators, regardless of CPR status. The results meet the American Heart Association's sensitivity requirement (>90%).
由于胸外按压会在心电图中产生伪影,因此目前的自动体外除颤器会在进行自动节律分析时指示用户停止心肺复苏(CPR)。已证明,尽量减少 CPR 的中断会增加生存的机会。
本研究的目的是应用一种使用卷积层、残差网络和双向长短期记忆方法的深度学习算法,在存在和不存在 CPR 伪影的情况下对可电击与不可电击节律进行分类。使用 Physionet 的 40 名患者的数据,这些数据来自商业自动体外除颤器在停搏期间采集的 1131 个可电击和 2741 个不可电击样本,这些样本受到 43 种不同 CPR 伪影的污染。我们将数据分为训练集和测试集。使用我们的深度神经网络模型,对整个数据集在 4 折交叉验证集上的冲击与非冲击决策的敏感性和特异性分别为 95.21%和 86.03%。这一结果是基于在存在和不存在 CPR 伪影的情况下使用心电图数据对模型进行训练和测试得出的。对于没有 CPR 伪影的心电图,敏感性为 99.04%,特异性为 95.2%。对于有 CPR 伪影的心电图,敏感性为 94.21%,特异性为 86.14%。除了 4 折交叉验证集外,我们还检查了一次留一受试者验证。在一次留一受试者验证的情况下,敏感性和特异性分别为 92.71%和 97.6%。
所提出的训练模型可以在自动体外除颤器中做出电击与非电击决策,而不论 CPR 状态如何。结果符合美国心脏协会的敏感性要求(>90%)。