Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States.
BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, United States.
Elife. 2021 Mar 5;10:e64206. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64206.
Establishing how many people have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 remains an urgent priority for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Serological tests that identify past infection can be used to estimate cumulative incidence, but the relative accuracy and robustness of various sampling strategies have been unclear. We developed a flexible framework that integrates uncertainty from test characteristics, sample size, and heterogeneity in seroprevalence across subpopulations to compare estimates from sampling schemes. Using the same framework and making the assumption that seropositivity indicates immune protection, we propagated estimates and uncertainty through dynamical models to assess uncertainty in the epidemiological parameters needed to evaluate public health interventions and found that sampling schemes informed by demographics and contact networks outperform uniform sampling. The framework can be adapted to optimize serosurvey design given test characteristics and capacity, population demography, sampling strategy, and modeling approach, and can be tailored to support decision-making around introducing or removing interventions.
确定有多少人感染了 SARS-CoV-2 仍然是控制 COVID-19 大流行的当务之急。能够识别过去感染的血清学检测可用于估计累计发病率,但各种采样策略的相对准确性和稳健性尚不清楚。我们开发了一个灵活的框架,该框架整合了来自测试特征、样本量以及亚人群中血清流行率异质性的不确定性,以比较采样方案的估计值。使用相同的框架并假设血清阳性表示免疫保护,我们通过动力学模型传播估计值和不确定性,以评估评估公共卫生干预措施所需的流行病学参数的不确定性,结果发现,基于人口统计学和接触网络的采样方案优于均匀采样。该框架可以根据测试特征和能力、人口统计学、采样策略和建模方法进行优化,以确定血清学调查设计,并可以针对干预措施的引入或移除进行定制,以支持决策制定。