• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

立陶宛精神卫生服务中《国际疾病分类第11版》创伤后应激障碍及复杂性创伤后应激障碍的结构

The structure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in Lithuanian mental health services.

作者信息

Kazlauskas Evaldas, Gegieckaite Goda, Hyland Philip, Zelviene Paulina, Cloitre Marylene

机构信息

Department of Clinical and Organizational Psychology, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania.

School of Business, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 11;9(1):1414559. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1414559.

DOI:10.1080/20008198.2017.1414559
PMID:33680347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7874935/
Abstract

: The updated 11 edition of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) is expected to be released by the WHO in 2018. Disorders specifically associated with stress will be included in a separate chapter in ICD-11, and will include a revision of ICD-10 PTSD as well as a new diagnosis of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (CPTSD). The proposed symptom structures of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD have been validated in several studies previously, however few studies have used the International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ), a specific measure for ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD. Given that ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD diagnoses are intended to be applicable across different cultures and nations, it is important that the constructs be evaluated across diverse populations and languages. : Study of the psychological impact of trauma is relatively new in Lithuania, coinciding with its independence from the Soviet Union in the 1990s. Studies thus far reveal a population suffering from the effects of long-term and systematic political oppression and violence. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the symptoms and structure of PTSD and CPTSD in a Lithuanian treatment-seeking sample as measured by the ITQ. : A total of 280 patients from outpatient mental health centres participated in this study. PTSD and CPTSD symptoms were measured with the ITQ. We applied confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and latent class analysis (LCA) for analysis of data. : Our study supported the ICD-11 factor structure of CPTSD, and a three-class model was supported in LCA analysis with a PTSD class, a CPTSD class, and a low symptom class. Findings support the factorial and discriminant validity of the ICD-11 proposals for PTSD and CPTSD in a unique clinical population.

摘要

《国际疾病分类》(ICD)第11版预计将于2018年由世界卫生组织发布。与压力特别相关的疾病将被纳入ICD - 11的一个单独章节,其中将包括对ICD - 10创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的修订以及复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的新诊断。此前已有多项研究验证了ICD - 11 PTSD和CPTSD提议的症状结构,但很少有研究使用国际创伤问卷(ITQ),这是一种针对ICD - 11 PTSD和CPTSD的特定测量工具。鉴于ICD - 11 PTSD和CPTSD诊断旨在适用于不同文化和国家,在不同人群和语言中对这些结构进行评估非常重要。

立陶宛对创伤心理影响的研究相对较新,这与该国在20世纪90年代从苏联独立有关。迄今为止的研究表明,该国人口遭受长期系统性政治压迫和暴力的影响。本研究的目的是通过ITQ评估立陶宛寻求治疗样本中PTSD和CPTSD症状及结构的有效性。

共有280名来自门诊心理健康中心的患者参与了本研究。使用ITQ测量PTSD和CPTSD症状。我们应用验证性因素分析(CFA)和潜在类别分析(LCA)对数据进行分析。

我们的研究支持了ICD - 11中CPTSD的因素结构,并且在LCA分析中支持了一个三类模型,即PTSD类、CPTSD类和低症状类。研究结果支持了ICD - 11中PTSD和CPTSD提议在一个独特临床人群中的因素效度和区分效度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/927b3c0c0a74/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/c3b4bbda99f6/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/2cb94bae268e/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/927b3c0c0a74/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/c3b4bbda99f6/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/2cb94bae268e/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6155/7874935/927b3c0c0a74/ZEPT_A_1414559_F0003_C.jpg

相似文献

1
The structure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in Lithuanian mental health services.立陶宛精神卫生服务中《国际疾病分类第11版》创伤后应激障碍及复杂性创伤后应激障碍的结构
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018 Jan 11;9(1):1414559. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1414559.
2
Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) for the Clinical Assessment of ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) in a Lithuanian Sample.验证国际创伤访谈(ITI)在立陶宛样本中用于 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的临床评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):2037905. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2037905. eCollection 2022.
3
Validation of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD in Chinese children as per the ICD-11 proposals using the International trauma questionnaire.根据国际疾病分类第11版(ICD-11)提案,使用国际创伤问卷对中国儿童创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性PTSD进行验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Mar 11;12(1):1888525. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1888525.
4
Symptom structure of ICD-11 Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (CPTSD) in trauma-exposed foster children: examining the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent Version (ITQ-CA).遭受创伤的寄养儿童中国际疾病分类第11版复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的症状结构:对儿童和青少年版国际创伤问卷(ITQ-CA)的检验
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2020 Nov 5;11(1):1818974. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1818974.
5
Examination of ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire - Child and Adolescent version (ITQ-CA) in a sample of Danish children and adolescents exposed to abuse.使用国际创伤问卷-儿童和青少年版(ITQ-CA)对丹麦受虐待的儿童和青少年样本中 ICD-11 PTSD 和 CPTSD 的检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2178761. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2178761.
6
Translation and validation of the Dari International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) in Afghan asylum seekers and refugees.达利国际创伤问卷(ITQ)在阿富汗寻求庇护者和难民中的翻译和验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023;14(1):2158428. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2158428.
7
Translation and validation of the Chinese ICD-11 International Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ) for the Assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD).用于评估创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂性创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的中文版国际创伤问卷(ITQ)的翻译与验证。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 15;10(1):1608718. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1608718. eCollection 2019.
8
Validation of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in foster children using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷对寄养儿童的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 进行验证。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Jan;141(1):60-73. doi: 10.1111/acps.13100. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
9
The validity of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in North Korean defectors using the International Trauma Questionnaire.采用国际创伤问卷对朝鲜脱北者的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的有效性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 7;13(2):2119012. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2119012. eCollection 2022.
10
ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD among organized violence survivors in modern South Korean history of political oppression.《政治压迫下现代韩国历史中组织性暴力幸存者的 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂 PTSD》
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2021 Mar;34(2):203-214. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2020.1839889. Epub 2020 Nov 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Construction and initial validation of the International Trauma Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (ITQ-CG): assessing ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD in children from caregiver perspective.国际创伤问卷-照顾者版(ITQ-CG)的构建与初步验证:从照顾者角度评估儿童的国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂PTSD(CPTSD)
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2493025. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2493025. Epub 2025 May 6.
2
Self-compassion as a mediator of attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, and complex PTSD in college students with adverse childhood experiences.自我同情在有童年不良经历的大学生中作为依恋焦虑、依恋回避和复杂性创伤后应激障碍的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 4;15(1):786. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-84947-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Disorders specifically associated with stress: A case-controlled field study for ICD-11 mental and behavioural disorders.与压力明确相关的疾病:针对国际疾病分类第11版精神和行为障碍的病例对照现场研究
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2016 May-Aug;16(2):109-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
2
A review of current evidence regarding the ICD-11 proposals for diagnosing PTSD and complex PTSD.当前有关 ICD-11 诊断 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 建议的证据综述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2017 Dec;58:1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
3
Intergenerational Transmission of Resilience? Sense of Coherence Is Associated between Lithuanian Survivors of Political Violence and Their Adult Offspring.
Adverse childhood experiences and ICD-11 complex posttraumatic stress disorder in Poland: a population-based study.
波兰的儿童期不良经历与国际疾病分类第 11 版复杂创伤后应激障碍:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2420464. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2420464. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
4
Efficacy of an internet-based guided trauma-focused intervention in reducing ICD-11 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.基于互联网的创伤聚焦干预对降低 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍症状的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):645. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06097-0.
5
Mapping the availability of translated versions of posttraumatic stress disorder screening questionnaires for adults: A scoping review.成人创伤后应激障碍筛查问卷翻译版本的可及性映射:一项范围综述
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Dec;13(2):2143019. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2143019. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
6
Disorders Specifically Associated With Stress in ICD-11.《国际疾病分类第11版》中与压力特别相关的疾病
Clin Psychol Eur. 2022 Dec 15;4(Spec Issue):e9711. doi: 10.32872/cpe.9711. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
The validity of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD in North Korean defectors using the International Trauma Questionnaire.采用国际创伤问卷对朝鲜脱北者的 ICD-11 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD 的有效性。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Oct 7;13(2):2119012. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2022.2119012. eCollection 2022.
8
Exploring the links between various traumatic experiences and ICD-11 PTSD and Complex PTSD: A cross-sectional study.探索各种创伤经历与《国际疾病分类第11版》创伤后应激障碍及复杂性创伤后应激障碍之间的联系:一项横断面研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 15;13:896981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896981. eCollection 2022.
9
The Effects of Online Mindfulness-Based Intervention on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial With 3-Month Follow-Up.基于正念的在线干预对创伤后应激障碍和复杂性创伤后应激障碍症状的影响:一项为期3个月随访的随机对照试验
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 30;13:799259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.799259. eCollection 2022.
10
Validation of the International Trauma Interview (ITI) for the Clinical Assessment of ICD-11 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Complex PTSD (CPTSD) in a Lithuanian Sample.验证国际创伤访谈(ITI)在立陶宛样本中用于 ICD-11 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍(CPTSD)的临床评估。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Feb 23;13(1):2037905. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2037905. eCollection 2022.
复原力的代际传递?立陶宛政治暴力幸存者与其成年子女之间存在连贯感关联。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 26;8:1677. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01677. eCollection 2017.
4
Validation of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD using the International Trauma Questionnaire.使用国际创伤问卷验证创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和复杂创伤后应激障碍。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 Sep;136(3):313-322. doi: 10.1111/acps.12771. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
5
Differential predictors of DSM-5 PTSD and ICD-11 complex PTSD among African American women.非裔美国女性中 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和 ICD-11 复杂性 PTSD 的差异预测因素
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2017 Jun 15;8(1):1338914. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2017.1338914. eCollection 2017.
6
Variation in post-traumatic response: the role of trauma type in predicting ICD-11 PTSD and CPTSD symptoms.创伤后反应的差异:创伤类型在预测国际疾病分类第11版创伤后应激障碍和复杂创伤后应激障碍症状中的作用。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017 Jun;52(6):727-736. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1350-8. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
7
Alternative models of disorders of traumatic stress based on the new ICD-11 proposals.基于国际疾病分类第11版新提案的创伤应激障碍替代模型。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 May;135(5):419-428. doi: 10.1111/acps.12695. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
8
"No Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Lithuania": National Health Care Fails to Identify PTSD.“立陶宛不存在创伤后应激障碍”:国家医疗保健体系未能识别创伤后应激障碍。
J Trauma Stress. 2017 Feb;30(1):99-102. doi: 10.1002/jts.22152. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
9
Adjustment disorder: Empirical study of a new diagnostic concept for ICD-11 in the general population in Lithuania.适应障碍:立陶宛普通人群中针对国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)一个新诊断概念的实证研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;40:20-25. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
10
An initial psychometric assessment of an ICD-11 based measure of PTSD and complex PTSD (ICD-TQ): Evidence of construct validity.基于 ICD-11 的 PTSD 和复杂 PTSD(ICD-TQ)测量的初步心理计量评估:结构效度的证据。
J Anxiety Disord. 2016 Dec;44:73-79. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 17.