• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对近 6200 年前一场大屠杀所有受害者的全基因组分析。

Genome-wide analysis of nearly all the victims of a 6200 year old massacre.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia.

Institute of Evolutionary Biology, CSIC - Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247332. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247332
PMID:33690651
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7946188/
Abstract

Paleogenomic and bioanthropological studies of ancient massacres have highlighted sites where the victims were male and plausibly died all in battle, or were executed members of the same family as might be expected from a killing intentionally directed at subsets of a community, or where the massacred individuals were plausibly members of a migrant community in conflict with previously established groups, or where there was evidence that the killing was part of a religious ritual. Here we provide evidence of killing on a massive scale in prehistory that was not directed to a specific family, based on genome-wide ancient DNA for 38 of the 41 documented victims of a 6,200 year old massacre in Potočani, Croatia and combining our results with bioanthropological data. We highlight three results: (i) the majority of individuals were unrelated and instead were a sample of what was clearly a large farming population, (ii) the ancestry of the individuals was homogenous which makes it unlikely that the massacre was linked to the arrival of new genetic ancestry, and (iii) there were approximately equal numbers of males and females. Combined with the bioanthropological evidence that the victims were of a wide range of ages, these results show that large-scale indiscriminate killing is a horror that is not just a feature of the modern and historic periods, but was also a significant process in pre-state societies.

摘要

古屠杀的古基因组学和生物人类学研究强调了一些地点,在这些地点,受害者是男性,很可能是在战斗中全部死亡,或者是同一家庭的被处决成员,这可能是有意针对社区的一部分人进行的杀戮,或者是屠杀的人很可能是与先前建立的群体发生冲突的移民社区的成员,或者有证据表明杀戮是宗教仪式的一部分。在这里,我们根据克罗地亚波托恰尼 6200 年前大屠杀中记录的 41 名受害者中的 38 名的全基因组古代 DNA,提供了史前大规模杀戮的证据,这些杀戮不是针对特定家庭的,并将我们的结果与生物人类学数据结合起来。我们强调了三个结果:(i)大多数个体是无关的,而是一个明显的大型农业人口样本,(ii)个体的祖先具有同质性,这使得屠杀与新遗传祖先的到来无关的可能性降低,以及(iii)男性和女性的数量大致相等。结合生物人类学证据表明受害者的年龄范围广泛,这些结果表明,大规模的不分青红皂白的杀戮不仅是现代和历史时期的一个特征,也是前国家社会的一个重要过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/e34c1678ce14/pone.0247332.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/9318864c8bed/pone.0247332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/494ef273b19d/pone.0247332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/59b11ceb5393/pone.0247332.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/7f0ffea7e57f/pone.0247332.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/afa537612366/pone.0247332.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/e34c1678ce14/pone.0247332.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/9318864c8bed/pone.0247332.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/494ef273b19d/pone.0247332.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/59b11ceb5393/pone.0247332.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/7f0ffea7e57f/pone.0247332.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/afa537612366/pone.0247332.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ef3/7946188/e34c1678ce14/pone.0247332.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Genome-wide analysis of nearly all the victims of a 6200 year old massacre.对近 6200 年前一场大屠杀所有受害者的全基因组分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 10;16(3):e0247332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247332. eCollection 2021.
2
Mass violence in Copper Age Europe: The massacre burial site from Potočani, Croatia.铜器时代欧洲的大规模暴力:来自克罗地亚波托恰尼的屠杀埋葬地。
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021 Nov;176(3):474-485. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.24396. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Scientific evidence for the identification of an Aboriginal massacre at the Sturt Creek sites on the Kimberley frontier of north-western Australia.关于在澳大利亚西北部金伯利边境的斯特尔特溪遗址发现原住民大屠杀事件的科学证据。
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Oct;279:258-267. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.018. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
4
Identification of the 18 World War II executed citizens of Adele, Rethymnon, Crete using an ancient DNA approach and low coverage genomes.利用古 DNA 方法和低覆盖度基因组鉴定二战期间在克里特岛雷提莫恩的阿代尔被处决的 18 位公民。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2024 Jul;71:103060. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2024.103060. Epub 2024 May 14.
5
Prehistoric massacre revealed. Perimortem cranial trauma from Potočani, Croatia.史前大屠杀揭秘。克罗地亚波托查尼的濒死期颅骨创伤。
Anthropol Anz. 2017 Jul 1;74(2):131-141. doi: 10.1127/anthranz/2017/0688. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
Development of the Australian Society of Forensic Odontology disaster victim identification forensic odontology guide.澳大利亚法医牙科学会灾难受害者身份鉴定法医牙科学指南的制定。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2009 Dec 1;27(2):56-63.
7
In search for the grave of 100 Poles executed on March 20, 1942 in Zgierz, Poland - research by SIGO (Network for Genetic Identification of Victims).寻找1942年3月20日在波兰兹吉尔被处决的100名波兰人的坟墓——SIGO(受害者基因识别网络)的研究。
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2017;67(1):16-34. doi: 10.5114/amsik.2017.70335.
8
Contribution of forensic anthropology to identification process in Croatia: examples of victims recovered in wells.法医人类学对克罗地亚身份鉴定过程的贡献:从井中打捞的受害者案例
Croat Med J. 2007 Aug;48(4):503-12.
9
Managing the identification of the mortal victims run over by a train in the Castelldefels railway accident (Barcelona).处理在 Castelldefels 铁路事故(巴塞罗那)中被火车碾压致死的受害者身份确认工作。
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2015 Sep;17(5):366-70. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 22.
10
The Knowledge Level of Dentists in Turkey About Their Potential Role on the Disaster Victims Identification (DVI) Team.土耳其牙医对其在灾难遇难者身份识别(DVI)团队中潜在角色的认知水平。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2019 Jun;13(3):533-538. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2018.111. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Ancient DNA reveals diverse community organizations in the 5th millennium BCE Carpathian Basin.古代DNA揭示了公元前5000年喀尔巴阡盆地的多样社群组织。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jun 24;16(1):5318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60368-2.
2
Urbanization and genetic homogenization in the medieval Low Countries revealed through a ten-century paleogenomic study of the city of Sint-Truiden.通过对圣特吕登市长达十个世纪的古基因组研究揭示中世纪低地国家的城市化与基因同质化
Genome Biol. 2025 May 20;26(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13059-025-03580-z.
3
Social and genetic diversity in first farmers of central Europe.

本文引用的文献

1
A genetic history of the pre-contact Caribbean.接触前加勒比地区的遗传史。
Nature. 2021 Feb;590(7844):103-110. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03053-2. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
2
Increased rate of close-kin unions in the central Andes in the half millennium before European contact.在与欧洲人接触的半个千年前,安第斯中部的近亲联姻率增加。
Curr Biol. 2020 Sep 7;30(17):R980-R981. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.07.072.
3
Low Prevalence of Lactase Persistence in Bronze Age Europe Indicates Ongoing Strong Selection over the Last 3,000 Years.青铜时代欧洲乳糖持续存在的低发生率表明,在过去的 3000 年中持续存在强烈的选择。
中欧首批农民的社会与基因多样性。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jan;9(1):53-64. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02034-z. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
4
Leveraging ancient DNA to uncover signals of natural selection in Europe lost due to admixture or drift.利用古代 DNA 揭示因混合或漂变而在欧洲失去的自然选择信号。
Nat Commun. 2024 Nov 12;15(1):9772. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-53852-8.
5
Pervasive findings of directional selection realize the promise of ancient DNA to elucidate human adaptation.定向选择的普遍发现实现了古DNA阐明人类适应性的前景。
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 15:2024.09.14.613021. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.14.613021.
6
Y Chromosome Story-Ancient Genetic Data as a Supplementary Tool for the Analysis of Modern Croatian Genetic Pool.Y 染色体故事——古代遗传数据作为现代克罗地亚遗传库分析的辅助工具。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;15(6):748. doi: 10.3390/genes15060748.
7
The Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR) a curated compendium of ancient human genomes.Allen 古代 DNA 资源 (AADR) 是一个经过策展的古代人类基因组纲要。
Sci Data. 2024 Feb 10;11(1):182. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03031-7.
8
Haplotype-based inference of recent effective population size in modern and ancient DNA samples.基于单体型的现代和古代 DNA 样本中近期有效种群大小的推断。
Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 1;14(1):7945. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43522-6.
9
Understanding natural selection in Holocene Europe using multi-locus genotype identity scans.利用多位点基因型同一性扫描理解全新世欧洲的自然选择。
bioRxiv. 2023 Apr 25:2023.04.24.538113. doi: 10.1101/2023.04.24.538113.
10
Hunter-gatherer admixture facilitated natural selection in Neolithic European farmers.狩猎采集者的混合促进了新石器时代欧洲农民的自然选择。
Curr Biol. 2023 Apr 10;33(7):1365-1371.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.02.049. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Curr Biol. 2020 Nov 2;30(21):4307-4315.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.08.033. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
The spread of steppe and Iranian-related ancestry in the islands of the western Mediterranean.西地中海岛屿中草原和伊朗相关祖先的传播。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;4(3):334-345. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1102-0. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
A massacre of early Neolithic farmers in the high Pyrenees at Els Trocs, Spain.西班牙比利牛斯山脉埃尔斯特罗茨发现的新石器时代早期农民大屠杀遗址。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 7;10(1):2131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58483-9.
6
Unraveling ancestry, kinship, and violence in a Late Neolithic mass grave.解析:原文中“Unraveling”为动词,在译文中要体现出来。“ancestry”和“kinship”表示“祖先和血缘关系”,但由于原文中没有明确说明是“祖先的血缘关系”,所以在译文中将其翻译为“血缘关系”。 译文:解析晚石器时代集体墓穴中的祖先、血缘关系和暴力
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):10705-10710. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1820210116. Epub 2019 May 6.
7
The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years.过去 8000 年来伊比利亚半岛的基因组历史。
Science. 2019 Mar 15;363(6432):1230-1234. doi: 10.1126/science.aav4040.
8
A mass sacrifice of children and camelids at the Huanchaquito-Las Llamas site, Moche Valley, Peru.秘鲁莫切河谷 Huanchaquito-Las Llamas 遗址的儿童和骆驼大规模祭祀。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 6;14(3):e0211691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211691. eCollection 2019.
9
Early Neolithic executions indicated by clustered cranial trauma in the mass grave of Halberstadt.哈尔堡大规模墓地中集中性颅骨创伤显示出的新石器时代早期处决
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 25;9(1):2472. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04773-w.
10
A minimally-invasive method for sampling human petrous bones from the cranial base for ancient DNA analysis.一种从颅底采集人类颞骨岩部用于古DNA分析的微创方法。
Biotechniques. 2017 Jun 1;62(6):283-289. doi: 10.2144/000114558.