Suppr超能文献

为老年患者提供临终关怀的挑战和促进因素:临床医生视角的范围综述。

Challenges and facilitators in delivering optimal care at the End of Life for older patients: a scoping review on the clinicians' perspective.

机构信息

School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Building 4, Room G.33, Mackay City Campus, Sydney Street, Mackay, QLD, 4740, Australia.

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Oct;33(10):2643-2656. doi: 10.1007/s40520-021-01816-z. Epub 2021 Mar 13.

Abstract

The concepts and elements determining quality of care at the End of Life may vary across professional groups but there is consensus that high-quality care at the End of Life is beneficial for the patient, families, health systems and society at large. This scoping review aimed to elucidate gaps in the delivery of this specific type of care in older people from the clinicians' perspective, and to identify potential solutions to both improve this care and promote work satisfaction by the involved clinicians. Twelve studies published since 2010 with data from 18 countries identified four major gaps: (1) Core clinical competencies; (2) Shared decision-making; (3) Health care system, environmental context, and resources; and (4) Organisational leadership, culture and legislation. Multiple suggestions for staff communications training, multidisciplinary mentoring, and advance care planning alignment with patient wishes were identified. However, a clear picture arose of consistently unmet needs that have been previously highlighted in research for more than a decade. This indicates poor uptake of previous recommendations and highlights the difficulties in changing the service culture to ensure provision of optimal services at the End of Life. Future investigations on the reasons for poor uptake and identification of effective approaches to execute the agreed recommendations are warranted.

摘要

在生命末期,决定医疗质量的概念和要素可能因专业群体而异,但人们普遍认为,生命末期的高质量医疗对患者、家庭、卫生系统和整个社会都有益。本范围综述旨在从临床医生的角度阐明老年人提供这种特殊类型护理方面的差距,并确定潜在的解决方案,以改善这种护理,并提高相关临床医生的工作满意度。自 2010 年以来发表的 12 项研究,数据来自 18 个国家,确定了四个主要差距:(1)核心临床能力;(2)共同决策;(3)医疗保健系统、环境背景和资源;以及(4)组织领导力、文化和立法。确定了多项关于员工沟通培训、多学科指导以及与患者意愿保持一致的预先护理计划的建议。然而,一个清晰的画面出现了,表明之前十多年的研究中一直强调的需求未得到满足。这表明以前的建议没有得到很好的采纳,并突出了改变服务文化以确保在生命末期提供最佳服务的困难。未来有必要调查采纳不佳的原因,并确定执行商定建议的有效方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验