Li Xueyan, Liu Di, Sun Yang, Yang Jingyun, Yu Youcheng
Department of Stomatology, Eye & Ent Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200031, China.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China.
Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021 Mar;28(3):1645-1653. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.11.071. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
Previous studies have reported the association between multiple genetic variants in the enamel-formation genes and the risk of dental caries with inconsistent results. We performed a systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, HuGE and Google Scholar databases for studies published before March 21, 2020 and conducted meta-, gene-based and gene-cluster analysis on the association between genetic variants in the enamel-formation genes and the risk of dental caries. We identified 21 relevant publications including a total of 24 studies for analysis. The genetic variant rs17878486 in was significantly associated with dental caries risk (OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.02-1.93, = 0.037). We found no significant association between the risk of dental caries with rs12640848 in (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.88-1.52, = 0.310), rs1784418 in (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.76-1.49, = 0.702) and rs3796704 in (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.96-1.17, = 0.228). Gene-based analysis indicated that multiple genetic variants in showed joint association with the risk of dental caries (6 variants; < 10), so did genetic variants in (3 variants; = 0.004), (3 variants; < 10), (2 variants; < 10) and (2 variants; < 10). The gene-cluster analysis indicated a significant association between the genetic variants in this enamel-formation gene cluster and the risk of dental caries ( < 10). The present meta-analysis revealed that genetic variant rs17878486 in was associated with dental caries, and multiple genetic variants in the enamel-formation genes jointly contributed to the risk of dental caries, supporting the role of genetic variants in the enamel-formation genes in the etiology of dental caries.
先前的研究报告了牙釉质形成基因中的多个基因变异与龋齿风险之间的关联,但结果并不一致。我们对PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、HuGE和谷歌学术数据库进行了系统的文献检索,以查找2020年3月21日前发表的研究,并对牙釉质形成基因中的基因变异与龋齿风险之间的关联进行了荟萃分析、基于基因的分析和基因簇分析。我们确定了21篇相关出版物,共包括24项研究进行分析。[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异rs17878486与龋齿风险显著相关(比值比=1.40,95%置信区间:1.02-1.93,P=0.037)。我们发现[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的rs12640848(比值比=1.15,95%置信区间:0.88-1.52,P=0.310)、[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的rs1784418(比值比=1.07,95%置信区间:0.76-1.49,P=0.702)和[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的rs3796704(比值比=1.06,95%置信区间:0.96-1.17,P=0.228)与龋齿风险之间无显著关联。基于基因的分析表明,[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的多个基因变异与龋齿风险存在联合关联(6个变异;P<0.10),[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异(3个变异;P=0.004)、[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异(3个变异;P<0.10)、[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异(2个变异;P<0.10)和[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异(2个变异;P<0.10)也如此。基因簇分析表明,该牙釉质形成基因簇中的基因变异与龋齿风险之间存在显著关联(P<0.10)。本荟萃分析表明,[此处原文缺失具体基因名称]中的基因变异rs17878486与龋齿有关,牙釉质形成基因中的多个基因变异共同导致了龋齿风险,支持牙釉质形成基因中的基因变异在龋齿病因学中的作用。