• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有共病的用户如何看待参与社会服务?一项定性访谈研究。

How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study.

机构信息

School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.

Department of Social Work, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1901468. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1901468.

DOI:10.1080/17482631.2021.1901468
PMID:33752576
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8725697/
Abstract

: This study aims to construct a theoretical framework that explains how users with comorbidity of substance use and mental illness/neuropsychiatric disorders portray user participation in social work encounters.: To construct this framework a constructivist grounded theory approach was used with semi-structured qualitative interviews with 12 users.: The main concern of the participants was the low trust in the social services and perceiving that this lack of trust is mutual. Establishing mutual trust is a social process that cuts through the whole framework. In the framework, prerequisites for participation are explained. The prerequisites are users being motivated and having the willingness to stop using drugs and receiving support, making use of user and staff knowledge and decision-making abilities and accessing help and support.: Unlike previous frameworks, the model describes participation as a social process and does not explain participation at different levels of power. The results suggest that staff need to be aware of low trust perceptions and work on establishing mutual trust. In addition, the staff need to see each user as an individual and consider how the user would prefer to be involved in decision-making.

摘要

本研究旨在构建一个理论框架,解释物质使用和精神疾病/神经精神障碍共病患者如何描述他们在社会工作接触中的参与情况。为了构建这个框架,我们采用了建构主义扎根理论方法,对 12 名患者进行了半结构化的定性访谈。参与者主要关注的是对社会服务的低信任度,并认为这种缺乏信任是相互的。建立相互信任是贯穿整个框架的一个社会过程。在这个框架中,解释了参与的前提条件。这些前提条件包括患者有动机和意愿停止使用毒品并获得支持,利用患者和工作人员的知识和决策能力,并获得帮助和支持。与之前的框架不同,该模型将参与描述为一个社会过程,而没有解释在不同权力层次上的参与。研究结果表明,工作人员需要意识到低信任度的认知,并努力建立相互信任。此外,工作人员需要将每个患者视为个体,并考虑患者希望如何参与决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e645/8725697/331c9123ede0/ZQHW_A_1901468_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e645/8725697/331c9123ede0/ZQHW_A_1901468_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e645/8725697/331c9123ede0/ZQHW_A_1901468_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
How do users with comorbidity perceive participation in social services? A qualitative interview study.患有共病的用户如何看待参与社会服务?一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1901468. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1901468.
2
Experiences of user involvement in mental health settings: User motivations and benefits.服务使用者参与心理健康服务的经历:使用者的动机与益处。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Jun;25(5-6):327-337. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12466. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
3
Service users' experiences of participation in decision making in mental health services.服务使用者参与精神卫生服务决策的体验。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):688-97. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12246. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
4
Mental health service user participation in Chinese culture: a model of independence or interdependence?心理健康服务使用者对中国文化的参与:独立模式还是相互依存模式?
J Ment Health. 2018 Aug;27(4):345-351. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1417546. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
5
Managing preconceived expectations: mental health service users experiences of going home from hospital: a grounded theory study.管理先入为主的期望:心理健康服务使用者的出院回家经历:一项扎根理论研究。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Nov;22(9):715-23. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12265. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Service user and family participation in mental health policy making in Timor-Leste: a qualitative study with multiple stakeholders.服务使用者和家属参与东帝汶精神卫生政策制定:多利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 12;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02521-3.
7
Inpatient staff perceptions in providing care to individuals with co-occurring mental health problems and illicit substance use.住院医护人员对同时存在心理健康问题和非法药物使用的个体提供护理的看法。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2010 Dec;17(10):862-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2010.01620.x. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
8
Dependence and resistance in community mental health care-Negotiations of user participation between staff and users.社区精神卫生保健中的依赖与抗拒——工作人员与服务对象之间关于服务对象参与的协商
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Oct;24(8):600-609. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12407. Epub 2017 Aug 3.
9
User participation in community mental health services: exploring the experiences of users and professionals.用户参与社区心理健康服务:探索用户与专业人员的体验
Scand J Caring Sci. 2009 Dec;23(4):674-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00660.x. Epub 2009 Oct 4.
10
The interrelated process of becoming independent in user participation for young persons living with disabilities.残疾青年在用户参与中实现独立的相关过程。
Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Feb;46(4):714-722. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2175385. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
User and staff experiences of a revised process for coordinating support with shared decision making in the comorbidity field of practice: a qualitative interview study.在共病实践领域中,用户和工作人员对通过共享决策来协调支持的修订流程的体验:一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2447095. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2447095. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
2
Barriers and facilitators for social inclusion among people with concurrent mental health and substance use problems. A qualitative scoping review.同时患有精神健康问题和物质使用问题的人群实现社会包容的障碍与促进因素。一项定性范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 16;19(12):e0315758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315758. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creating a process of user involvement and shared decision-making in coordinated care planning with users and caregivers in social services.与社会服务中的用户和照护者共同创建用户参与和共同决策的协调护理计划过程。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2020 Dec;15(1):1812270. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2020.1812270.
2
Overcoming Heroin Addiction without the Use of Pharmaceuticals: A Qualitative Interview Study.在不使用药物的情况下戒除海洛因成瘾:一项定性访谈研究。
J Psychoactive Drugs. 2020 Jul-Aug;52(3):211-217. doi: 10.1080/02791072.2020.1755478. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
3
Shared decision making in the social services? Reasons to consider when choosing methods for service user participation.
Epistemic citizenship under structural siege: a meta-analysis drawing on 544 voices of service user experiences in Nordic mental health services.
结构围困下的认知公民身份:一项基于北欧心理健康服务中544名服务使用者经历的元分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 2;14:1156835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1156835. eCollection 2023.
社会服务中的共同决策?选择服务使用者参与方法时应考虑的因素。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):569-574. doi: 10.1111/jep.13323. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
4
Role preferences of patients with alcohol use disorders.酒精使用障碍患者的角色偏好。
Addict Behav. 2018 Sep;84:248-254. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 4.
5
Psychiatric service staff perceptions of implementing a shared decision-making tool: a process evaluation study.精神科服务人员对实施共同决策工具的看法:一项过程评估研究。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1421352. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1421352.
6
Decision making measured by the Iowa Gambling Task in alcohol use disorder and gambling disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用决策任务量表评估酒精使用障碍和赌博障碍中的决策:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Dec 1;181:152-161. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.023. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
7
Diversity or disarray? A systematic review of decision-making capacity for treatment and research in schizophrenia and other non-affective psychoses.多样性还是混乱?精神分裂症和其他非情感性精神病治疗和研究决策能力的系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2017 Aug;47(11):1906-1922. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000502. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
8
Decision Making Impairment: A Shared Vulnerability in Obesity, Gambling Disorder and Substance Use Disorders?决策障碍:肥胖、赌博障碍和物质使用障碍中的共同易感性?
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 30;11(9):e0163901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163901. eCollection 2016.
9
Systematic synthesis of barriers and facilitators to service user-led care planning.对服务使用者主导的护理计划中的障碍和促进因素进行系统综合分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;207(2):104-14. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.114.152447.
10
Information and decision-making needs among people with affective disorders - results of an online survey.情感障碍患者的信息及决策需求——一项在线调查的结果
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 May 4;9:627-38. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S78495. eCollection 2015.