• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经对齐预测了学习计算机科学入门课程学生的学习成果。

Neural alignment predicts learning outcomes in students taking an introduction to computer science course.

机构信息

Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 26;12(1):1922. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22202-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-021-22202-3
PMID:33771999
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7997890/
Abstract

Despite major advances in measuring human brain activity during and after educational experiences, it is unclear how learners internalize new content, especially in real-life and online settings. In this work, we introduce a neural approach to predicting and assessing learning outcomes in a real-life setting. Our approach hinges on the idea that successful learning involves forming the right set of neural representations, which are captured in canonical activity patterns shared across individuals. Specifically, we hypothesized that learning is mirrored in neural alignment: the degree to which an individual learner's neural representations match those of experts, as well as those of other learners. We tested this hypothesis in a longitudinal functional MRI study that regularly scanned college students enrolled in an introduction to computer science course. We additionally scanned graduate student experts in computer science. We show that alignment among students successfully predicts overall performance in a final exam. Furthermore, within individual students, we find better learning outcomes for concepts that evoke better alignment with experts and with other students, revealing neural patterns associated with specific learned concepts in individuals.

摘要

尽管在测量教育经验期间和之后的人类大脑活动方面取得了重大进展,但学习者如何内化新内容(尤其是在现实生活和在线环境中)仍不清楚。在这项工作中,我们引入了一种神经方法来预测和评估现实环境中的学习成果。我们的方法基于这样一种观点,即成功的学习涉及形成正确的神经表示集,这些表示集被捕获在个体之间共享的典型活动模式中。具体来说,我们假设学习反映在神经对齐中:个体学习者的神经表示与专家以及其他学习者的神经表示的匹配程度。我们在一项纵向功能磁共振成像研究中检验了这一假设,该研究定期扫描参加计算机科学入门课程的大学生。我们还扫描了计算机科学领域的研究生专家。我们表明,学生之间的对齐可以成功预测期末考试的整体表现。此外,在个体学生中,我们发现与专家和其他学生的对齐程度更好的概念会产生更好的学习效果,从而揭示了与个体特定学习概念相关的神经模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/dd76373f7dc0/41467_2021_22202_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/84c429f0ec34/41467_2021_22202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/b1230f012ec9/41467_2021_22202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/7a0e3462ce14/41467_2021_22202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/4151115de8b8/41467_2021_22202_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/3d2159dbde61/41467_2021_22202_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/dd76373f7dc0/41467_2021_22202_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/84c429f0ec34/41467_2021_22202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/b1230f012ec9/41467_2021_22202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/7a0e3462ce14/41467_2021_22202_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/4151115de8b8/41467_2021_22202_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/3d2159dbde61/41467_2021_22202_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b116/7997890/dd76373f7dc0/41467_2021_22202_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural alignment predicts learning outcomes in students taking an introduction to computer science course.神经对齐预测了学习计算机科学入门课程学生的学习成果。
Nat Commun. 2021 Mar 26;12(1):1922. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22202-3.
2
Neural Representations of Physics Concepts.物理概念的神经表示。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Jun;27(6):904-13. doi: 10.1177/0956797616641941. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
3
Knowing is half the battle: Assessments of both student perception and performance are necessary to successfully evaluate curricular transformation.知己知彼,百战不殆:要成功评估课程改革,既要评估学生的认知,也要评估学生的表现。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0210030. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210030. eCollection 2019.
4
[Analysis of Learner Characteristics Affecting Learning Outcomes in the Field of Pharmaceutical Law].[影响药事法领域学习成果的学习者特征分析]
Yakugaku Zasshi. 2020;140(7):949-953. doi: 10.1248/yakushi.19-00209.
5
Structured academic discussions through an online education-specific platform to improve Pharm.D. students learning outcomes.通过一个专门针对在线教育的平台进行结构化学术讨论,以提高药学博士学生的学习成果。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Mar-Apr;9(2):230-236. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.11.022. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
6
Flipping around the classroom: Accelerated Bachelor of Science in Nursing students' satisfaction and achievement.翻转课堂:护理学理学学士加速课程学生的满意度与学业成绩
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
Development of a self-report instrument for measuring in-class student engagement reveals that pretending to engage is a significant unrecognized problem.开发一种自我报告工具来衡量课堂学生参与度,结果表明,假装参与是一个严重但未被认识到的问题。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 17;13(10):e0205828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205828. eCollection 2018.
9
Phys-MAPS: a programmatic physiology assessment for introductory and advanced undergraduates.Phys-MAPS:面向本科新生和高年级学生的程序化生理学评估
Adv Physiol Educ. 2019 Mar 1;43(1):15-27. doi: 10.1152/advan.00128.2018.
10
Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study.护理专业学生合作编写多项选择题考试复习题:一项学生参与度研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Dec;59:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting Real-Life Cognitive Scores From Functional Connectivity.从功能连接预测现实生活中的认知分数。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Aug 15;46(12):e70319. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70319.
2
Boundaries in the eyes: Measure event segmentation during naturalistic video watching using eye tracking.眼睛中的边界:使用眼动追踪技术测量自然视频观看过程中的事件分割
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Aug 12;57(9):255. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02790-4.
3
Music-evoked reactivation during continuous perception is associated with enhanced subsequent recall of naturalistic events.

本文引用的文献

1
Community structure of the creative brain at rest.静息状态下创造性大脑的群落结构。
Neuroimage. 2020 Apr 15;210:116578. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116578. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Learning Desire Is Predicted by Similar Neural Processing of Naturalistic Educational Materials.学习欲望由自然主义教育材料的相似神经处理预测。
eNeuro. 2019 Oct 3;6(5). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0083-19.2019. Print 2019 Sep/Oct.
3
Measuring shared responses across subjects using intersubject correlation.使用受试者间相关系数来衡量受试者间的共同反应。
在持续感知过程中,音乐诱发的再激活与随后对自然主义事件的回忆增强有关。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 6:2025.07.05.663273. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.05.663273.
4
Thinking as Analogy-Making: Toward a Neural Process Account of General Intelligence.作为类比推理的思维:迈向关于一般智力的神经过程解释。
J Neurosci. 2025 Apr 30;45(18):e1555242025. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1555-24.2025.
5
Knowledge concept recognition in the learning brain via fMRI classification.通过功能磁共振成像分类识别学习大脑中的知识概念
Front Neurosci. 2025 Mar 21;19:1499629. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1499629. eCollection 2025.
6
Linguistic coupling between neural systems for speech production and comprehension during real-time dyadic conversations.实时双向对话中,言语产生与理解神经系统之间的语言耦合。
bioRxiv. 2025 Feb 16:2025.02.14.638276. doi: 10.1101/2025.02.14.638276.
7
A Rapid Cortical Learning Process Supporting Students' Knowledge Construction During Real Classroom Teaching.一种支持学生在真实课堂教学中进行知识建构的快速皮层学习过程。
Adv Sci (Weinh). 2025 May;12(18):e2416610. doi: 10.1002/advs.202416610. Epub 2025 Feb 7.
8
The paradoxical brain: paradoxes impact conflict perspectives through increased neural alignment.矛盾的大脑:矛盾通过增加神经一致性来影响冲突观点。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Sep 3;34(9). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae353.
9
How a speaker herds the audience: multibrain neural convergence over time during naturalistic storytelling.演讲者如何引导听众:自然叙事过程中多脑同步的时间演化。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Sep 24;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae059.
10
A shared model-based linguistic space for transmitting our thoughts from brain to brain in natural conversations.在自然对话中,通过共享基于模型的语言空间,将我们的思想从大脑传送到大脑。
Neuron. 2024 Sep 25;112(18):3211-3222.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2024.06.025. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019 Aug 7;14(6):667-685. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsz037.
4
Decoding individual differences in STEM learning from functional MRI data.从功能磁共振成像数据解码 STEM 学习中的个体差异。
Nat Commun. 2019 May 2;10(1):2027. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10053-y.
5
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
6
Converging measures of neural change at the microstructural, informational, and cortical network levels in the hippocampus during the learning of the structure of organic compounds.在学习有机化合物结构的过程中,海马体的微观结构、信息和皮质网络水平上的神经变化的收敛测量。
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Apr;224(3):1345-1357. doi: 10.1007/s00429-019-01838-4. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
7
Shared understanding of narratives is correlated with shared neural responses.叙事的共同理解与共同的神经反应相关。
Neuroimage. 2019 Jan 1;184:161-170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.010. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
8
Neural engagement with online educational videos predicts learning performance for individual students.学生对在线教育视频的神经参与度可以预测其学习表现。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2018 Nov;155:60-64. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
How We Transmit Memories to Other Brains: Constructing Shared Neural Representations Via Communication.我们如何将记忆传递给其他大脑:通过交流构建共享的神经表示。
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4988-5000. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhx202.
10
A Network Neuroscience of Human Learning: Potential to Inform Quantitative Theories of Brain and Behavior.人类学习的网络神经科学:为大脑与行为的定量理论提供信息的潜力。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Apr;21(4):250-264. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Mar 2.