• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗酸胃糖浆对牙科修复材料表面性能的影响:粗糙度和显微硬度的体外分析

Effect of antacid gastric syrups on surface properties of dental restorative materials: an in vitro analysis of roughness and microhardness.

作者信息

Öcal Fikri, Dayi Burak

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05516-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-05516-2
PMID:39856639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762459/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the effects of antacid gastric syrups on the surface roughness and microhardness of restorative dental materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three different composite resins, nanohybrid, microhybrid and giomer, and four antacid gastric syrups were used in the study. A total of 150 samples were obtained by preparing 50 (10 mm x 2 mm) disk-shaped samples of each composite type. The composites were randomly divided into 5 subgroups and immersed in antacid syrups for 2 min every day for 28 days. The control group samples were kept in distilled water for 28 days. Surface roughness was measured at the beginning, on the 7th, 15th and 28th days using a mechanical profilometer, AFM, and SEM and microhardness was measured using a Vickers device. Shapiro-Wilk, Repeated Measures ANOVA, One-Way ANOVA, Tukey and Games-Howell tests were applied for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

After 28 days, the surface roughness of the giomer composite decreased significantly (p < 0.05). The surface roughness of microhybrid and nanohybrid composites increased slightly but not significantly (p > 0.05). Microhardness values of microhybrid and giomer composites showed a significant decrease (p < 0.05). SEM and AFM results were in agreement with the mechanical profilometer findings.

CONCLUSION

Agents such as calcium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate and magnesium carbonate in antacid gastric syrups can affect the surface properties of restorative dental materials. This may adversely affect the longevity and aesthetics of restorations.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The study emphasizes the need for caution in restorative material selection and care protocols in patients using antacid gastric syrups.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在评估抗酸胃糖浆对牙科修复材料表面粗糙度和显微硬度的影响。

材料与方法

本研究使用了三种不同的复合树脂,即纳米混合树脂、微混合树脂和聚硅氧烷增强型玻璃离子复合体,以及四种抗酸胃糖浆。通过制备每种复合树脂类型的50个(10毫米×2毫米)圆盘形样品,共获得150个样品。将复合材料随机分为5个亚组,每天浸泡在抗酸糖浆中2分钟,持续28天。对照组样品在蒸馏水中保存28天。在开始时、第7天、第15天和第28天使用机械轮廓仪、原子力显微镜和扫描电子显微镜测量表面粗糙度,并使用维氏装置测量显微硬度。采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验、重复测量方差分析、单因素方差分析、图基检验和盖姆斯-豪厄尔检验进行统计分析。

结果

28天后,聚硅氧烷增强型玻璃离子复合体复合材料的表面粗糙度显著降低(p < 0.05)。微混合树脂和纳米混合树脂复合材料的表面粗糙度略有增加,但不显著(p > 0.05)。微混合树脂和聚硅氧烷增强型玻璃离子复合体复合材料的显微硬度值显著降低(p < 0.05)。扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜的结果与机械轮廓仪的结果一致。

结论

抗酸胃糖浆中的碳酸钙、碳酸氢钠和碳酸镁等成分会影响牙科修复材料的表面性能。这可能会对修复体的寿命和美观产生不利影响。

临床意义

该研究强调了在为使用抗酸胃糖浆的患者选择修复材料和护理方案时需谨慎。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/55d0bbb27ad4/12903_2025_5516_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/0dfc143c134e/12903_2025_5516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/4e2bbdc6aa43/12903_2025_5516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/d1e4fdca5424/12903_2025_5516_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/8a9a28c068b6/12903_2025_5516_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/4a622630457e/12903_2025_5516_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/55d0bbb27ad4/12903_2025_5516_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/0dfc143c134e/12903_2025_5516_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/4e2bbdc6aa43/12903_2025_5516_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/d1e4fdca5424/12903_2025_5516_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/8a9a28c068b6/12903_2025_5516_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/4a622630457e/12903_2025_5516_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c36e/11762459/55d0bbb27ad4/12903_2025_5516_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of antacid gastric syrups on surface properties of dental restorative materials: an in vitro analysis of roughness and microhardness.抗酸胃糖浆对牙科修复材料表面性能的影响:粗糙度和显微硬度的体外分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05516-2.
2
Effect of pediatric multivitamin syrups and effervescent tablets on the surface microhardness and roughness of restorative materials: An in vitro study.小儿多种维生素糖浆和泡腾片对修复材料表面显微硬度和粗糙度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):311-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.03.017. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
3
The effect of thermal aging on microhardness and SEM/EDS for characterisation bioactive filling materials.热老化对生物活性填充材料的显微硬度和 SEM/EDS 分析的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1142. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04643-6.
4
Effect of three bleaching agents on the surface properties of three different esthetic restorative materials.三种漂白剂对三种不同美学修复材料表面性能的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2003 May;89(5):466-73. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00105-7.
5
Comparative evaluation of probiotic solutions on surface roughness and microhardness of different restorative materials and enamel.不同修复材料和牙釉质表面粗糙度和显微硬度的益生菌溶液的比较评价。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):107-119. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.064. Epub 2024 May 3.
6
An in vitro comparison of the effects of various air polishing powders on enamel and selected esthetic restorative materials.不同空气抛光粉对牙釉质及选定的美学修复材料影响的体外比较。
J Clin Dent. 2014;25(4):76-87.
7
Evaluation of nanohardness, elastic modulus, and surface roughness of fluoride-releasing tooth colored restorative materials.评价释氟型牙色修复材料的纳米硬度、弹性模量和表面粗糙度。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;48(5):131-137. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.112. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
8
Gastric acid challenge: Mechanical proficiency and surface gloss of tooth-colored restorative materials.胃酸侵蚀试验:牙齿颜色修复材料的机械性能和表面光泽度。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05988-2.
9
Effects of sonic scaling on the surface roughness of restorative materials.超声洁治对修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。
J Oral Sci. 2009 Dec;51(4):607-14. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.51.607.
10
Effect of artificial aging on the roughness and microhardness of sealed composites.人工老化对密封复合材料粗糙度和显微硬度的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010 Oct;22(5):324-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00360.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of immersion in various beverages, polishing and bleaching systems on surface roughness and microhardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials.各种饮料浸泡、抛光和漂白系统对 CAD/CAM 修复材料表面粗糙度和显微硬度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):1458. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05256-9.
2
Development of toothpaste formulations containing mineral clays as abrasive agents and their effects on the physical properties of dental enamel.含矿物粘土作为研磨剂的牙膏配方的开发及其对牙釉质物理性能的影响。
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Jun;36(6):901-910. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13208. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
3
Characterization of novel alginate-Aloe Vera raft systems for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.
新型海藻酸钠-芦荟筏系统治疗胃食管反流病的特性研究。
Int J Biol Macromol. 2024 Feb;257(Pt 2):128686. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128686. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
4
Effect of mouthwashes on the microhardness of aesthetic composite restorative materials.漱口水对美学复合修复材料显微硬度的影响。
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2023 Aug 30;46(2):e1049. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.1049.
5
In Vitro evaluation of the effects of whitening toothpastes on the color and surface roughness of different composite resin materials.体外评价不同复合树脂材料的美白牙膏对其颜色和表面粗糙度的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 19;23(1):580. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03277-4.
6
Evaluation of the effects of whitening toothpaste containing nanohydroxyapatite on surface roughness and color change in restorative materials.评价含纳米羟基磷灰石的美白牙膏对修复材料表面粗糙度和颜色变化的影响。
PeerJ. 2023 Jul 14;11:e15692. doi: 10.7717/peerj.15692. eCollection 2023.
7
Burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of disease study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年胃食管反流病负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 29;23(1):582. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15272-z.
8
Assessment of Micro-Hardness, Degree of Conversion, and Flexural Strength for Single-Shade Universal Resin Composites.单色调通用树脂复合材料的显微硬度、转化率和弯曲强度评估
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;14(22):4987. doi: 10.3390/polym14224987.
9
Antacids revisited: review on contemporary facts and relevance for self-management.抗酸剂再探讨:当代事实与自我管理相关性的综述。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Mar;50(3):3000605221086457. doi: 10.1177/03000605221086457.
10
Effect of staining and bleaching on the microhardness, surface roughness and color of different composite resins.染色和漂白对不同复合树脂的显微硬度、表面粗糙度和颜色的影响。
Dent Med Probl. 2021 Jul-Sep;58(3):369-376. doi: 10.17219/dmp/131022.