Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0491;
Department of Communication, Utah Valley University, Orem, UT 84058-6703.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Apr 13;118(15). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002484118.
Many visible public debates over scientific issues are clouded in accusations of falsehood, which place increasing demands on citizens to distinguish fact from fiction. Yet, constraints on our ability to detect misinformation coupled with our inadvertent motivations to believe false science result in a high likelihood that we will form misperceptions. As science falsehoods are often presented with emotional appeals, we focus our perspective on the roles of emotion and humor in the formation of science attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors. Recent research sheds light on how funny science and emotions can help explain and potentially overcome our inability or lack of motivation to recognize and challenge misinformation. We identify some lessons learned from these related and growing areas of research and conclude with a brief discussion of the ethical considerations of using persuasive strategies, calling for more dialogue among members of the science communication community.
许多关于科学问题的公开辩论都充斥着虚假指控,这使得公民越来越需要区分事实和虚构。然而,我们识别错误信息的能力受到限制,再加上我们无意识地相信虚假科学的动机,这导致我们很有可能形成错误的认知。由于科学谣言通常带有情感诉求,我们将关注重点放在情感和幽默在科学态度、认知和行为形成中的作用上。最近的研究揭示了有趣的科学和情感如何帮助解释和可能克服我们识别和挑战错误信息的能力不足或缺乏动机。我们从这些相关且不断发展的研究领域中汲取了一些经验教训,并以简短的讨论结束,讨论了使用有说服力的策略的伦理考虑因素,呼吁科学界人士之间进行更多的对话。