Suppr超能文献

颈椎狭窄症中腰椎脑脊液压力和椎管内压力研究的安全性和可行性:病例系列。

Safety and Feasibility of Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Pressure and Intraspinal Pressure Studies in Cervical Stenosis: A Case Series.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

Balgrist University Hospital, University Spine Center, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2021;131:367-372. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-59436-7_70.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) leads to functional impairment by compression of the spinal cord and nerve roots. In DCM, the dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) and intraspinal pressure (ISP), as well as spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) remain not investigated yet. Recent technical advances have enabled investigation of these parameters in acute spinal cord injury (SCI). We aim to investigate the properties of CSFP/ISP and spinal cord hemodynamics during and after decompressive surgery in DCM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four patients with DCM were enrolled; during surgery and 24 h postoperative, ISP at level was measured in one patient, and CSFP was measured in two patients. In one patient, CSFP was recorded at bedside before surgery.

RESULTS

All measurements were conducted without adverse events and were well tolerated. With CSFP analysis, post-decompression Queckenstedt's test was responsive in two patients (i.e., jugular vein compression resulted in an elevation of CSFP pressure). In the patient whose CSFP was tested at bedside, Queckenstedt's test was not responsive before decompression. Individual optimum SCPPs were calculated to be between 70 and 75 mmHg.

CONCLUSION

ISP and CSFP can reflect spinal compression and sufficient decompression. A better understanding and systematic monitoring possibly lead to improved hemodynamic management and may allow early recognition of postoperative complications such as swelling and bleeding.

摘要

简介

退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)可因脊髓和神经根受压而导致功能障碍。在 DCM 中,脑脊液压力(CSFP)和脊髓内压(ISP)的动力学以及脊髓灌注压(SCPP)仍未得到研究。最近的技术进步使得能够在急性脊髓损伤(SCI)中研究这些参数。我们旨在研究 DCM 减压手术后 CSFP/ISP 和脊髓血液动力学的特性。

材料和方法

纳入了 4 名 DCM 患者;在手术期间和术后 24 小时,1 名患者测量了 ISP 水平,2 名患者测量了 CSFP。在 1 名患者中,手术前在床边记录了 CSFP。

结果

所有测量均无不良事件发生,且均耐受良好。在 CSFP 分析中,减压后 Queckenstedt 试验在 2 名患者中具有反应性(即颈静脉压迫导致 CSFP 压力升高)。在床边测试 CSFP 的患者中,减压前 Queckenstedt 试验无反应。计算出个体最佳 SCPP 为 70-75mmHg。

结论

ISP 和 CSFP 可以反映脊髓压迫和充分减压。更好地理解和系统监测可能会导致更好的血液动力学管理,并可能允许早期识别术后肿胀和出血等并发症。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验