Järup L, Elinder C G, Spång G
Department of Environmental Hygiene, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1988;60(3):223-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00378700.
Biological monitoring, i.e. using individual measures of exposure such as cadmium in blood, is supposed to reflect the real dose better than the more commonly used external measures such as air-cadmium. In order to investigate this, cumulative cadmium doses were estimated individually for 440 workers in a battery factory. Cumulative air-cadmium dose as well as two different cumulative blood-cadmium doses were computed for each study individual. Forty workers had evidence of tubular proteinuria and a clear dose-response relationship was found for each of the dose estimates. Our results suggest that cumulative blood-cadmium is a more sensitive indicator of cadmium-induced renal dysfunction than cumulative air-cadmium.
生物监测,即使用个体接触量指标,如血液中的镉含量,相较于更常用的外部指标,如空气中的镉含量,理应能更好地反映实际剂量。为对此进行研究,我们对一家电池厂的440名工人分别估算了累积镉剂量。为每位研究对象计算了累积空气镉剂量以及两种不同的累积血液镉剂量。40名工人有肾小管蛋白尿的证据,并且在每种剂量估算中都发现了明确的剂量-反应关系。我们的结果表明,相较于累积空气镉,累积血液镉是镉诱导的肾功能障碍更敏感的指标。