• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左束支起搏的手术相关并发症:单中心经验

Procedure-Related Complications of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience.

作者信息

Chen Xueying, Wei Lanfang, Bai Jin, Wang Wei, Qin Shengmei, Wang Jingfeng, Liang Yixiu, Su Yangang, Ge Junbo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xiamen Branch, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Xiamen, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 24;8:645947. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.645947. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.645947
PMID:33869306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8044788/
Abstract

Although left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) has emerged as a novel physiological pacing strategy with a low and stable threshold, its safety has not been well-documented. In the present study, we included all the patients with procedure-related complications at our centre to estimate these LBBP cases with unique complications. We enrolled 612 consecutive patients who received the procedure in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between January 2018 and July 2020. Regular follow-ups were conducted (at 1, 3, and 6 months in the first year and every 6-12 months from the second year), and the clinical data of the patients with complications were collected and analyzed. With a mean follow-up period of 12.32 ± 5.21 months, procedure-related complications were observed in 10 patients (1.63%) that included two postoperative septum perforations (2/612, 0.33%), two postoperative lead dislodgements (2/612, 0.33%), four intraoperative septum injuries (4/612, 0.65%), and two intraoperative lead fractures (2/612, 0.33%). Pacing parameters were stable during follow-up, and no major complications were observed after lead repositioning in the cases of septum perforation and lead dislodgement. The incidence of procedure-related complications for LBBP, namely postoperative septum perforation, postoperative lead dislodgement, intraoperative septum injury, and intraoperative lead fracture, were low. No adverse clinical outcomes were demonstrated after successful repositioning of the lead and appropriate treatment.

摘要

尽管左束支起搏(LBBP)已成为一种具有低且稳定阈值的新型生理性起搏策略,但其安全性尚未得到充分记录。在本研究中,我们纳入了本中心所有发生与手术相关并发症的患者,以评估这些具有独特并发症的LBBP病例。我们纳入了2018年1月至2020年7月在复旦大学附属中山医院连续接受该手术的612例患者。进行了定期随访(第一年在1、3和6个月时,第二年起每6 - 12个月),并收集和分析了有并发症患者的临床数据。平均随访期为12.32±5.21个月,10例患者(1.63%)出现了与手术相关的并发症,包括2例术后室间隔穿孔(2/612,0.33%)、2例术后导线脱位(2/612,0.33%)、4例术中室间隔损伤(4/612,0.65%)和2例术中导线断裂(2/612,0.33%)。随访期间起搏参数稳定,在室间隔穿孔和导线脱位病例中,导线重新定位后未观察到重大并发症。LBBP与手术相关并发症的发生率,即术后室间隔穿孔、术后导线脱位、术中室间隔损伤和术中导线断裂,较低。导线成功重新定位并进行适当治疗后,未出现不良临床结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/ff61d663bdc5/fcvm-08-645947-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/df6c652d870a/fcvm-08-645947-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/5ff20d0cceb6/fcvm-08-645947-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/063db75f1a07/fcvm-08-645947-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/1db562797908/fcvm-08-645947-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/36e3445d9eab/fcvm-08-645947-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/ff61d663bdc5/fcvm-08-645947-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/df6c652d870a/fcvm-08-645947-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/5ff20d0cceb6/fcvm-08-645947-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/063db75f1a07/fcvm-08-645947-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/1db562797908/fcvm-08-645947-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/36e3445d9eab/fcvm-08-645947-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcff/8044788/ff61d663bdc5/fcvm-08-645947-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Procedure-Related Complications of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience.左束支起搏的手术相关并发症:单中心经验
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 24;8:645947. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.645947. eCollection 2021.
2
Occurrence of ventricular septal perforation in patients with permanent left bundle branch pacing followed up using echocardiographic and computed tomography images.应用超声心动图和计算机断层扫描图像随访永久性左束支起搏患者发生室间隔穿孔。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2022 Nov;27(6):e13002. doi: 10.1111/anec.13002. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
3
Pros and Cons of Left Bundle Branch Pacing: A Single-Center Experience.左束支起搏的优缺点:单中心经验。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020 Dec;13(12):e008874. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008874. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
4
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.大型单中心研究中的左束支起搏的长期安全性和可行性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
5
Electrophysiological characteristics of septal perforation during left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏期间间隔穿孔的电生理特征
Heart Rhythm. 2022 May;19(5):728-734. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.01.018. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
6
Electrophysiological characteristics and clinical values of left bundle branch current of injury in left bundle branch pacing.左束支起搏中左束支损伤电流的电生理特征及临床价值。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;31(4):834-842. doi: 10.1111/jce.14377. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
7
Computerized tomography image correlation of His bundle/deep septal pacing location and outcomes: an analysis from the Canberra HIs bundle/deep septal Pacing Study (CHIPS).计算机断层扫描图像关联希氏束/深部室间隔起搏部位与结局:堪培拉希氏束/深部室间隔起搏研究(CHIPS)的分析。
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022 Jun;64(1):137-148. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01133-z. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
8
Left bundle branch pacing for symptomatic bradycardia: Implant success rate, safety, and pacing characteristics.左束支起搏治疗症状性心动过缓:植入成功率、安全性和起搏特征。
Heart Rhythm. 2019 Dec;16(12):1758-1765. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.05.014. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
Left bundle branch pacing versus left ventricular septal pacing as a primary procedural endpoint during left bundle branch area pacing: Evaluation of two different implant strategies.左束支区域起搏时以左束支起搏或左室间隔部起搏作为主要的即刻手术终点:两种不同植入策略的评估。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Jan;35(1):120-129. doi: 10.1111/jce.16128. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
10
Comparison of electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker therapy.比较接受起搏器治疗的患者中左束支起搏与右心室起搏的心电图特征和起搏参数。
Europace. 2019 Apr 1;21(4):673-680. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy252.

引用本文的文献

1
Apex vs. Septum Pacing: A Comprehensive Review of Pacemaker Implantation Strategies.心尖部起搏与间隔部起搏:起搏器植入策略的全面综述
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 25;13(8):1822. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13081822.
2
Complications with Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: The Flip Side of the Coin.左束支区域起搏的并发症:事物的另一面
Heart Int. 2025 Jun 19;19(1):26-30. doi: 10.17925/HI.2025.19.1.3. eCollection 2025.
3
Need for temporary mechanical circulatory support for dry tamponade caused by interventricular septal hematoma: A case report of a rare complication following left bundle branch area pacing.

本文引用的文献

1
Left bundle branch pacing is the best approach to physiological pacing.左束支起搏是生理性起搏的最佳方法。
Heart Rhythm O2. 2020 Apr 27;1(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2020.03.002. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Long-Term Safety and Feasibility of Left Bundle Branch Pacing in a Large Single-Center Study.大型单中心研究中的左束支起搏的长期安全性和可行性。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009261. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009261. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing vs. right ventricular pacing after mid-long-term follow-up: a single-centre experience.
室间隔血肿致心脏压塞需临时机械循环支持:左束支区域起搏后罕见并发症的病例报告
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2025 Jan 30;11(4):371-375. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2025.01.014. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Long-Term Complications Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.与心脏植入式电子设备相关的长期并发症
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 18;14(6):2058. doi: 10.3390/jcm14062058.
5
Physiological Ventricular Pacing from the Right Side of the Septum by Engaging the Subendocardial Purkinje Network.通过激活心内膜下浦肯野网络从室间隔右侧进行生理性心室起搏。
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2025 Feb 15;16(2):6199-6205. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2025.16025. eCollection 2025 Feb.
6
New Diseases Related to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): An Overview.与心脏植入式电子设备(CIEDs)相关的新疾病:概述
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1322. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041322.
7
Stylet-driven Leads or Lumenless Leads for Conduction System Pacing.用于传导系统起搏的探条驱动导线或无腔导线。
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2024 Sep 13;13:e14. doi: 10.15420/aer.2024.18. eCollection 2024.
8
Review of Atrioventricular Node Ablation Combined with Permanent His-Purkinje Conduction System Pacing in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation with Heart Failure.心房颤动合并心力衰竭患者房室结消融联合永久性希氏-浦肯野传导系统起搏的综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 5;25(9):312. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2509312. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Lumenless and Stylet-Driven Leads for Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing: Materials, Techniques, Benefits, and Trade-Offs of the Two Approaches.用于左束支区域起搏的无腔和导丝驱动电极:两种方法的材料、技术、益处及权衡
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 13;13(16):4758. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164758.
10
Late perforation of a left bundle branch area pacing lead causing ventricular fibrillation: A case report.左束支区域起搏导线迟发性穿孔导致心室颤动:一例报告
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2024 May 7;10(7):509-513. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2024.05.002. eCollection 2024 Jul.
左束支起搏与右心室起搏的中期随访后可行性和安全性:单中心经验。
Europace. 2020 Dec 26;22(Suppl_2):ii36-ii44. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa294.
4
Aborted ST-elevation myocardial infarction-An unusual complication of left bundle branch pacing.ST段抬高型心肌梗死中止——左束支起搏的一种罕见并发症。
HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2020 May 26;6(8):520-522. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2020.05.010. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Injection of contrast medium through a delivery sheath reveals interventricular septal vascular injury in a case of left bundle branch pacing.在一例左束支起搏病例中,通过输送鞘管注射造影剂显示室间隔血管损伤。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Aug;48(8):300060520947880. doi: 10.1177/0300060520947880.
6
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy Using Left Bundle Branch Pacing.左束支区域起搏治疗非缺血性心肌病患者的心脏再同步治疗。
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jul;6(7):849-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.04.011.
7
Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Nonrandomized On-Treatment Comparison With His Bundle Pacing and Biventricular Pacing.用于心脏再同步治疗的左束支起搏:与希氏束起搏和双心室起搏的非随机治疗中比较
Can J Cardiol. 2021 Feb;37(2):319-328. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.04.037. Epub 2020 May 7.
8
Evaluation of cardiac synchrony in left bundle branch pacing: Insights from echocardiographic research.左束支起搏中心脏同步性的评估:超声心动图研究的见解
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Feb;31(2):560-569. doi: 10.1111/jce.14342. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
9
Electrophysiological parameters and anatomical evaluation of left bundle branch pacing in an in vivo canine model.在体内犬模型中左束支起搏的电生理参数和解剖学评估。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):214-219. doi: 10.1111/jce.14300. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
10
Left bundle branch area pacing is superior to right ventricular septum pacing concerning depolarization-repolarization reserve.左束支区域起搏在去极化-复极化储备方面优于右室间隔起搏。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;31(1):313-322. doi: 10.1111/jce.14295. Epub 2019 Dec 10.