• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用深度卷积神经网络从原始加速度计数据中检测非佩戴时间的新算法。

A novel algorithm to detect non-wear time from raw accelerometer data using deep convolutional neural networks.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

School of Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87757-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-87757-z
PMID:33893345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8065130/
Abstract

To date, non-wear detection algorithms commonly employ a 30, 60, or even 90 mins interval or window in which acceleration values need to be below a threshold value. A major drawback of such intervals is that they need to be long enough to prevent false positives (type I errors), while short enough to prevent false negatives (type II errors), which limits detecting both short and longer episodes of non-wear time. In this paper, we propose a novel non-wear detection algorithm that eliminates the need for an interval. Rather than inspecting acceleration within intervals, we explore acceleration right before and right after an episode of non-wear time. We trained a deep convolutional neural network that was able to infer non-wear time by detecting when the accelerometer was removed and when it was placed back on again. We evaluate our algorithm against several baseline and existing non-wear algorithms, and our algorithm achieves a perfect precision, a recall of 0.9962, and an F1 score of 0.9981, outperforming all evaluated algorithms. Although our algorithm was developed using patterns learned from a hip-worn accelerometer, we propose algorithmic steps that can easily be applied to a wrist-worn accelerometer and a retrained classification model.

摘要

迄今为止,非佩戴检测算法通常采用 30、60 甚至 90 分钟的间隔或窗口,在此期间,加速度值需要低于阈值。这种间隔的一个主要缺点是,它们需要足够长以防止假阳性(I 类错误),同时又要足够短以防止假阴性(II 类错误),这限制了对短时间和长时间非佩戴时间的检测。在本文中,我们提出了一种新颖的非佩戴检测算法,该算法无需间隔。我们不是在间隔内检查加速度,而是在非佩戴时间前后的时间段内探索加速度。我们训练了一个深度卷积神经网络,该网络能够通过检测何时卸下加速度计以及何时重新放置来推断非佩戴时间。我们将我们的算法与几种基线和现有非佩戴算法进行了评估,我们的算法达到了完美的精度,召回率为 0.9962,F1 得分为 0.9981,优于所有评估的算法。尽管我们的算法是使用从佩戴在臀部的加速度计中学到的模式开发的,但我们提出了可以轻松应用于佩戴在手腕上的加速度计和重新训练的分类模型的算法步骤。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/9b73777f31e8/41598_2021_87757_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/566a828d2999/41598_2021_87757_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/9d11d374bbc7/41598_2021_87757_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/57b30433419f/41598_2021_87757_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/50dad804601c/41598_2021_87757_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/9b73777f31e8/41598_2021_87757_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/566a828d2999/41598_2021_87757_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/9d11d374bbc7/41598_2021_87757_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/57b30433419f/41598_2021_87757_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/50dad804601c/41598_2021_87757_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70b1/8065130/9b73777f31e8/41598_2021_87757_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel algorithm to detect non-wear time from raw accelerometer data using deep convolutional neural networks.一种使用深度卷积神经网络从原始加速度计数据中检测非佩戴时间的新算法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87757-z.
2
Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.使用加速度变化和温度变化率检测加速度计非佩戴期。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 20;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6.
3
Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.腕戴和髋戴 ActiGraph GT3X 在非实验室自由活动环境中自动佩戴时间检测算法的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9.
4
Development of a multi-wear-site, deep learning-based physical activity intensity classification algorithm using raw acceleration data.利用原始加速度数据开发基于多磨损部位的深度学习型体力活动强度分类算法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299295. eCollection 2024.
5
Generalizability and performance of methods to detect non-wear with free-living accelerometer recordings.使用自由活动加速度计记录检测非佩戴的方法的可推广性和性能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 13;13(1):2496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29666-x.
6
Detecting Sleep and Nonwear in 24-h Wrist Accelerometer Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.从国家健康和营养调查的 24 小时腕部加速计数据中检测睡眠和非佩戴状态
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Nov 1;54(11):1936-1946. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002973. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Accelerometer wear-site detection: When one site does not suit all, all of the time.加速度计佩戴部位检测:当一个部位并非始终适用于所有人时。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Apr;20(4):368-372. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.04.013. Epub 2016 May 21.
8
Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm.计步器佩戴和不佩戴时间分类算法的验证。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):357-64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3.
9
Development and application of an automated algorithm to identify a window of consecutive days of accelerometer wear for large-scale studies.一种用于大规模研究中识别加速度计连续佩戴天数窗口的自动化算法的开发与应用。
BMC Res Notes. 2015 Jun 26;8:270. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1229-2.
10
Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.使用多个加速度计和心电图记录评估原始和时段非佩戴算法的性能。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62821-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an alcohol biosensor non-wear algorithm: laboratory-based machine learning and field-based deployment.酒精生物传感器非佩戴算法的开发:基于实验室的机器学习和基于现场的部署。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16640-y.
2
A standardized workflow for long-term longitudinal actigraphy data processing using one year of continuous actigraphy from the CAN-BIND Wellness Monitoring Study.使用来自 CAN-BIND 健康监测研究的一年连续活动记录仪数据,为长期纵向活动记录仪数据处理制定标准化工作流程。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 15;13(1):15300. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42138-6.
3
Generalizability and performance of methods to detect non-wear with free-living accelerometer recordings.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.使用多个加速度计和心电图记录评估原始和时段非佩戴算法的性能。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62821-2.
2
Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data.不佩戴或睡眠?原始加速度计数据的五种非佩戴检测算法评估。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Feb;38(4):399-404. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1703301. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
3
Comparability of accelerometer signal aggregation metrics across placements and dominant wrist cut points for the assessment of physical activity in adults.
使用自由活动加速度计记录检测非佩戴的方法的可推广性和性能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 13;13(1):2496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29666-x.
4
Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.使用加速度变化和温度变化率检测加速度计非佩戴期。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 20;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6.
5
The seventh survey of the Tromsø Study (Tromsø7) 2015-2016: study design, data collection, attendance, and prevalence of risk factors and disease in a multipurpose population-based health survey.2015-2016 年特罗姆瑟研究第七次调查(特罗姆瑟 7):一项多用途基于人群的健康调查的研究设计、数据收集、参与情况以及危险因素和疾病的流行情况。
Scand J Public Health. 2022 Nov;50(7):919-929. doi: 10.1177/14034948221092294. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Putting Temperature into the Equation: Development and Validation of Algorithms to Distinguish Non-Wearing from Inactivity and Sleep in Wearable Sensors.将温度纳入考量:开发和验证算法以区分可穿戴传感器中的非佩戴、不活动和睡眠状态。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Feb 1;22(3):1117. doi: 10.3390/s22031117.
7
Inertial Measurement Unit Sensors in Assistive Technologies for Visually Impaired People, a Review.惯性测量单元传感器在视障辅助技术中的应用综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;21(14):4767. doi: 10.3390/s21144767.
在评估成年人的身体活动时,加速度计信号聚合指标在不同位置和主要手腕切割点的可比性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18235. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54267-y.
4
Physical activity levels in adults and elderly from triaxial and uniaxial accelerometry. The Tromsø Study.成年人和老年人的三轴和单轴加速度计活动水平。特罗姆瑟研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225670. eCollection 2019.
5
Accelerometer-Based Human Fall Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks.基于加速度计的卷积神经网络人体跌倒检测
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Apr 6;19(7):1644. doi: 10.3390/s19071644.
6
Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.比较和验证加速度计佩戴时间和非佩戴时间算法,以评估儿童和青少年的身体活动水平。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0712-1.
7
Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.腕戴和髋戴 ActiGraph GT3X 在非实验室自由活动环境中自动佩戴时间检测算法的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9.
8
Statistical machine learning of sleep and physical activity phenotypes from sensor data in 96,220 UK Biobank participants.基于英国生物库 96220 名参与者的传感器数据,对睡眠和身体活动表型进行统计机器学习。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 21;8(1):7961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26174-1.
9
A comparison of 10 accelerometer non-wear time criteria and logbooks in children.比较 10 种加速度计非佩戴时间标准和儿童日志。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Mar 6;18(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5212-4.
10
A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.一项关于成年人身体活动测量技术的综述系统评价:DEDIPAC 研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Feb 8;15(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2.