• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用加速度变化和温度变化率检测加速度计非佩戴期。

Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 20;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6
PMID:35596151
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9123693/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accelerometery is commonly used to estimate physical activity, sleep, and sedentary behavior. In free-living conditions, periods of device removal (non-wear) can lead to misclassification of behavior with consequences for research outcomes and clinical decision making. Common methods for non-wear detection are limited by data transformations (e.g., activity counts) or algorithm parameters such as minimum durations or absolute temperature thresholds that risk over- or under-estimating non-wear time. This study aimed to advance non-wear detection methods by integrating a 'rate-of-change' criterion for temperature into a combined temperature-acceleration algorithm.

METHODS

Data were from 39 participants with neurodegenerative disease (36% female; age: 45-83 years) who wore a tri-axial accelerometer (GENEActiv) on their wrist 24-h per day for 7-days as part of a multi-sensor protocol. The reference dataset was derived from visual inspection conducted by two expert analysts. Linear regression was used to establish temperature rate-of-change as a criterion for non-wear detection. A classification and regression tree (CART) decision tree classifier determined optimal parameters separately for non-wear start and end detection. Classifiers were trained using data from 15 participants (38.5%). Outputs from the CART analysis were supplemented based on edge cases and published parameters.

RESULTS

The dataset included 186 non-wear periods (85.5% < 60 min). Temperature rate-of-change over the first five minutes of non-wear was - 0.40 ± 0.17 °C/minute and 0.36 ± 0.21 °C/minute for the first five minutes following device donning. Performance of the DETACH (DEvice Temperature and Accelerometer CHange) algorithm was improved compared to existing algorithms with recall of 0.942 (95% CI 0.883 to 1.0), precision of 0.942 (95% CI 0.844 to 1.0), F1-Score of 0.942 (95% CI 0.880 to 1.0) and accuracy of 0.996 (0.994-1.000).

CONCLUSION

The DETACH algorithm accurately detected non-wear intervals as short as five minutes; improving non-wear classification relative to current interval-based methods. Using temperature rate-of-change combined with acceleration results in a robust algorithm appropriate for use across different temperature ranges and settings. The ability to detect short non-wear periods is particularly relevant to free-living scenarios where brief but frequent removals occur, and for clinical application where misclassification of behavior may have important implications for healthcare decision-making.

摘要

背景

加速度计常用于估计身体活动、睡眠和久坐行为。在自由生活条件下,设备移除(非佩戴)的时间段可能导致行为分类错误,从而影响研究结果和临床决策。常用的非佩戴检测方法受到数据转换(例如,活动计数)或算法参数的限制,例如最小持续时间或绝对温度阈值,这些参数可能会导致非佩戴时间的过度或低估。本研究旨在通过将“变化率”标准纳入温度与加速度的综合算法,来改进非佩戴检测方法。

方法

数据来自 39 名患有神经退行性疾病的参与者(36%为女性;年龄:45-83 岁),他们在手腕上佩戴三轴加速度计(GENEActiv),每天 24 小时佩戴 7 天,作为多传感器方案的一部分。参考数据集来自两位专家分析人员的目视检查。使用线性回归建立温度变化率作为非佩戴检测的标准。分类和回归树(CART)决策树分类器分别为非佩戴开始和结束检测确定最佳参数。使用来自 15 名参与者(38.5%)的数据训练分类器。CART 分析的输出结果基于边缘情况和已发布的参数进行补充。

结果

数据集包括 186 个非佩戴时间段(85.5% < 60 分钟)。在非佩戴的前 5 分钟内,温度变化率为 -0.40 ± 0.17°C/分钟,在设备佩戴后的前 5 分钟内,温度变化率为 0.36 ± 0.21°C/分钟。与现有的算法相比,DETACH(设备温度和加速度变化)算法的性能得到了提高,召回率为 0.942(95%置信区间 0.883 至 1.0),精度为 0.942(95%置信区间 0.844 至 1.0),F1-评分为 0.942(95%置信区间 0.880 至 1.0),准确率为 0.996(0.994-1.000)。

结论

DETACH 算法可以准确检测到最短 5 分钟的非佩戴间隔;与当前基于间隔的方法相比,提高了非佩戴的分类准确性。使用温度变化率与加速度相结合,得到了一种稳健的算法,适用于不同温度范围和环境。检测短暂非佩戴期的能力对于自由生活场景尤其相关,在这些场景中,短暂但频繁的移除情况较为常见,对于临床应用,行为分类错误可能对医疗保健决策产生重要影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/718430ccacc4/12874_2022_1633_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/880a0b18f54e/12874_2022_1633_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/c0f8677c6f74/12874_2022_1633_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/e8b874d599e4/12874_2022_1633_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/718430ccacc4/12874_2022_1633_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/880a0b18f54e/12874_2022_1633_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/c0f8677c6f74/12874_2022_1633_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/e8b874d599e4/12874_2022_1633_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f44e/9123693/718430ccacc4/12874_2022_1633_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detecting accelerometer non-wear periods using change in acceleration combined with rate-of-change in temperature.使用加速度变化和温度变化率检测加速度计非佩戴期。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 May 20;22(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01633-6.
2
Classification of accelerometer wear and non-wear events in seconds for monitoring free-living physical activity.以秒为单位对加速度计佩戴和未佩戴事件进行分类,以监测自由生活中的身体活动。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 11;5(5):e007447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007447.
3
Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data.不佩戴或睡眠?原始加速度计数据的五种非佩戴检测算法评估。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Feb;38(4):399-404. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1703301. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Feasibility of Using a GENEActiv Accelerometer with Triaxial Acceleration and Temperature Sensors to Monitor Adherence to Shoulder Sling Wear Following Surgery.使用具有三轴加速度和温度传感器的 GENEActiv 加速度计监测手术后肩部吊带佩戴依从性的可行性。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;24(3):880. doi: 10.3390/s24030880.
5
Identifying sedentary time using automated estimates of accelerometer wear time.使用加速度计佩戴时间的自动估计来确定久坐时间。
Br J Sports Med. 2012 May;46(6):436-42. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.079699. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
6
Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm.计步器佩戴和不佩戴时间分类算法的验证。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Feb;43(2):357-64. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3.
7
Accelerometer data reduction in adolescents: effects on sample retention and bias.青少年加速度计数据的简化:对样本保留和偏差的影响。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Dec 23;10:140. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-140.
8
Detecting Sleep and Nonwear in 24-h Wrist Accelerometer Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.从国家健康和营养调查的 24 小时腕部加速计数据中检测睡眠和非佩戴状态
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022 Nov 1;54(11):1936-1946. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002973. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
9
Development of a multi-wear-site, deep learning-based physical activity intensity classification algorithm using raw acceleration data.利用原始加速度数据开发基于多磨损部位的深度学习型体力活动强度分类算法。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 7;19(3):e0299295. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299295. eCollection 2024.
10
Identifying ActiGraph non-wear time in pregnant women with overweight or obesity.识别超重或肥胖孕妇的 ActiGraph 非活动时间。
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Dec;23(12):1197-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning Predicts Postoperative Mobility, Activities of Daily Living, and Discharge Destination in Older Adults from Sensor Data.深度学习通过传感器数据预测老年人术后的活动能力、日常生活活动及出院去向。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;25(16):5021. doi: 10.3390/s25165021.
2
Development of an alcohol biosensor non-wear algorithm: laboratory-based machine learning and field-based deployment.酒精生物传感器非佩戴算法的开发:基于实验室的机器学习和基于现场的部署。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 25;15(1):31154. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16640-y.
3
Measuring resting heart rate during daily life using wearable technology: Examining the impact of behavioral context and methodological criteria.

本文引用的文献

1
Feasibility of a continuous, multi-sensor remote health monitoring approach in persons living with neurodegenerative disease.在患有神经退行性疾病的人群中,连续多传感器远程健康监测方法的可行性。
J Neurol. 2022 May;269(5):2673-2686. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10831-z. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
2
A novel algorithm to detect non-wear time from raw accelerometer data using deep convolutional neural networks.一种使用深度卷积神经网络从原始加速度计数据中检测非佩戴时间的新算法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 23;11(1):8832. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87757-z.
3
The Effects of Displacing Sedentary Behavior With Two Distinct Patterns of Light Activity on Health Outcomes in Older Adults (Implications for COVID-19 Quarantine).
使用可穿戴技术测量日常生活中的静息心率:考察行为背景和方法标准的影响。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 14;11:20552076251367506. doi: 10.1177/20552076251367506. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
4
A proof of concept for wear/non-wear classification using accelerometer data in daily activity recording: Synthetic algorithm leveraging probability and continuity of zero counts.使用日常活动记录中的加速度计数据进行穿戴/不穿戴分类的概念验证:利用零计数的概率和连续性的综合算法。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 22;19(10):e0309917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309917. eCollection 2024.
5
Mitigating data quality challenges in ambulatory wrist-worn wearable monitoring through analytical and practical approaches.通过分析和实践方法缓解可穿戴式监测设备中腕部可移动监测的数据分析质量挑战。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 30;14(1):17545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67767-3.
6
SciKit digital health package for accelerometry-measured physical activity: comparisons to existing solutions and investigations of age effects in healthy adults.用于加速度计测量身体活动的SciKit数字健康软件包:与现有解决方案的比较以及对健康成年人年龄影响的研究。
Front Digit Health. 2023 Nov 27;5:1321086. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1321086. eCollection 2023.
7
Wrist Accelerometer Estimates of Physical Activity Intensity During Walking in Older Adults and People Living With Complex Health Conditions: Retrospective Observational Data Analysis Study.老年人及患有复杂健康状况者行走时手腕加速度计对身体活动强度的估计:回顾性观察数据分析研究
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Mar 15;7:e41685. doi: 10.2196/41685.
8
Generalizability and performance of methods to detect non-wear with free-living accelerometer recordings.使用自由活动加速度计记录检测非佩戴的方法的可推广性和性能。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 13;13(1):2496. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29666-x.
9
A systematic review of digital technology to evaluate motor function and disease progression in motor neuron disease.一项系统评价数字技术在运动神经元病中评估运动功能和疾病进展的应用。
J Neurol. 2022 Dec;269(12):6254-6268. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11312-7. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
两种不同模式的轻度活动替代久坐行为对老年人健康结局的影响(对COVID-19隔离的启示)
Front Physiol. 2020 Dec 11;11:574595. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.574595. eCollection 2020.
4
Systematic Review Looking at the Use of Technology to Measure Free-Living Symptom and Activity Outcomes in Parkinson's Disease in the Home or a Home-like Environment.系统评价着眼于使用技术在家或类似家庭环境中测量帕金森病的自由生活症状和活动结果。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(2):429-454. doi: 10.3233/JPD-191781.
5
Evaluating the performance of raw and epoch non-wear algorithms using multiple accelerometers and electrocardiogram recordings.使用多个加速度计和心电图记录评估原始和时段非佩戴算法的性能。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 3;10(1):5866. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62821-2.
6
Reducing Sedentary Time among Older Adults in Assisted Living: Perceptions, Barriers, and Motivators.减少辅助生活中老年人的久坐时间:看法、障碍和动机。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 22;17(3):717. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030717.
7
Non-wear or sleep? Evaluation of five non-wear detection algorithms for raw accelerometer data.不佩戴或睡眠?原始加速度计数据的五种非佩戴检测算法评估。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Feb;38(4):399-404. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1703301. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
8
Sleep and Obesity.睡眠与肥胖
J Obes Metab Syndr. 2018 Mar 30;27(1):4-24. doi: 10.7570/jomes.2018.27.1.4.
9
Comparison and validation of accelerometer wear time and non-wear time algorithms for assessing physical activity levels in children and adolescents.比较和验证加速度计佩戴时间和非佩戴时间算法,以评估儿童和青少年的身体活动水平。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Apr 2;19(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0712-1.
10
Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X.腕戴和髋戴 ActiGraph GT3X 在非实验室自由活动环境中自动佩戴时间检测算法的验证。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9.