• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新开发的硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质及细胞相容性

Physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of newly developed calcium silicate-based sealers.

作者信息

Park Min-Gyu, Kim In-Ryoung, Kim Hyung Joon, Kwak Sang Won, Kim Hyeon-Cheol

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.

Department of Oral Anatomy, Pusan National University School of Dentistry, Yangsan, Korea.

出版信息

Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):512-519. doi: 10.1111/aej.12515. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1111/aej.12515
PMID:33894082
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the physical properties and cytocompatibility of contemporary calcium silicate-based sealers. Four calcium silicate-based sealers (BrightEndo MTA sealer, CeraSeal, EndoSeal TCS and One-Fil) were compared to an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus). Flow, setting time, radiopacity and dimensional change were evaluated according to ISO 6876 standards. Cytotoxicity on human periodontal ligament fibroblast (hPDLF) cells was compared for biological properties using MTT assay. The surface of the sealer was analysed using scanning electron microscopy to evaluate cell attachment. Flow and radiopacity of all sealers met ISO standards, while setting time and dimensional stability did not meet the ISO standards. Calcium silicate-based sealers showed favourable cytocompatibility, and hPDLF cells were well attached to the calcium silicate-based sealers. Calcium silicate-based sealers have clinically acceptable flow and radiopacity, and cytocompatibility. However, these sealers had longer setting time and higher dimensional change than those required by ISO 6876.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较当代硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理性能和细胞相容性。将四种硅酸钙基封闭剂(BrightEndo MTA封闭剂、CeraSeal、EndoSeal TCS和One-Fil)与一种环氧树脂基封闭剂(AH Plus)进行比较。根据ISO 6876标准评估流动性、凝固时间、射线不透性和尺寸变化。使用MTT法比较对人牙周膜成纤维细胞(hPDLF)的细胞毒性以评估生物学性能。使用扫描电子显微镜分析封闭剂表面以评估细胞附着情况。所有封闭剂的流动性和射线不透性均符合ISO标准,而凝固时间和尺寸稳定性不符合ISO标准。硅酸钙基封闭剂显示出良好的细胞相容性,并且hPDLF细胞能很好地附着在硅酸钙基封闭剂上。硅酸钙基封闭剂具有临床上可接受的流动性、射线不透性和细胞相容性。然而,这些封闭剂的凝固时间比ISO 6876要求的更长,尺寸变化更大。

相似文献

1
Physicochemical properties and cytocompatibility of newly developed calcium silicate-based sealers.新开发的硅酸钙基封闭剂的物理化学性质及细胞相容性
Aust Endod J. 2021 Dec;47(3):512-519. doi: 10.1111/aej.12515. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Physicochemical Properties and Biocompatibility of Various Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers: In Vitro Study.各种生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化性能和生物相容性:体外研究。
J Endod. 2023 Jul;49(7):871-879. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.05.013. Epub 2023 May 22.
3
Chemical-Physical Properties and Bioactivity of New Premixed Calcium Silicate-Bioceramic Root Canal Sealers.新型预混硅酸钙-生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的理化性能及生物活性。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 11;23(22):13914. doi: 10.3390/ijms232213914.
4
Cytocompatibility, bioactivity potential, and ion release of three premixed calcium silicate-based sealers.三种混合钙硅酸钠基密封剂的细胞相容性、生物活性潜力和离子释放。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 May;24(5):1749-1759. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-03036-2. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
5
Cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based sealers in a three-dimensional cell culture model.基于硅酸钙的封闭剂在三维细胞培养模型中的细胞相容性
Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jun;21(5):1531-1536. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1918-9. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Evaluation of cytocompatibility of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers and their effects on the biological responses of mesenchymal dental stem cells.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的细胞相容性及其对间充质牙干细胞生物学反应的影响评估。
Int Endod J. 2017 Jan;50(1):67-76. doi: 10.1111/iej.12596. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
7
Comparison of Biocompatibility of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers and Epoxy Resin-Based Sealer on Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.硅酸钙基封闭剂与环氧树脂基封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞生物相容性的比较
Materials (Basel). 2020 Nov 20;13(22):5242. doi: 10.3390/ma13225242.
8
Evaluation of the biological and physicochemical properties of calcium silicate-based and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评估基于硅酸钙和环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的生物和理化性能。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022 Jun;110(6):1344-1353. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.35004. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
Biocompatibility of three new calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers on human periodontal ligament stem cells.三种新型硅酸钙基根管封闭剂对人牙周膜干细胞的生物相容性。
Int Endod J. 2017 Sep;50(9):875-884. doi: 10.1111/iej.12703. Epub 2016 Oct 22.
10
Heating stability, physical and chemical analysis of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers.硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的加热稳定性及理化分析。
Int Endod J. 2021 Jul;54(7):1175-1188. doi: 10.1111/iej.13496. Epub 2021 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Irrigation Solutions on the Setting Time, Solubility, and pH of Three Types of Premixed Bioceramic-Based Root Canal Sealers.冲洗液对三种预混生物陶瓷基根管封闭剂凝固时间、溶解度和pH值的影响
Int J Dent. 2025 Aug 19;2025:1995662. doi: 10.1155/ijod/1995662. eCollection 2025.
2
Sealing ability of the single-cone obturation technique with bioceramic sealer iRoot SP in oval root canals: an in vitro study.使用生物陶瓷封闭剂iRoot SP的单尖充填技术在椭圆形根管中的封闭能力:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):1364. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06713-9.
3
In Vitro Bioactivity and Cytotoxicity Assessment of Two Root Canal Sealers.
两种根管封闭剂的体外生物活性和细胞毒性评估
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;18(15):3717. doi: 10.3390/ma18153717.
4
Comparative evaluation of retreatability of three different bioceramic sealers using xylene in root canal retreatment - An cone-beam computed tomography analysis.使用二甲苯对三种不同生物陶瓷封闭剂在根管再治疗中的可再处理性进行比较评估——锥形束计算机断层扫描分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):687-692. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_292_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
5
Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: An study.各种根管封闭剂物理化学性质的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Apr;28(4):325-330. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_866_24. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
6
Retrieval of AH Plus Bioceramic and Ceraseal Versus AH Plus in Endodontic Retreatment.AH Plus生物陶瓷和Ceraseal与AH Plus用于牙髓再治疗的疗效比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 8;14(6):1826. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061826.
7
Comparative analysis of the inflammatory response of human gingival fibroblasts to NeoSEALER Flo and CeraSeal bioceramic sealers: an in vitro study.人牙龈成纤维细胞对NeoSEALER Flo和CeraSeal生物陶瓷封闭剂炎症反应的比较分析:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05692-1.
8
Micro-Computed Tomography Analysis of Resin and Calcium Silicate Based Sealers Removal in Mandibular Molars Curved Canals.下颌磨牙弯曲根管中树脂类和硅酸钙类封闭剂去除的显微计算机断层扫描分析
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2024 Jun;58(2):134-144. doi: 10.15644/asc58/2/3.
9
Premixed calcium silicate-based root canal sealers have better biological properties than AH Plus: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vivo animal studies and laboratory studies.预混硅酸钙基根管封闭剂比AH Plus具有更好的生物学性能:一项对体内动物研究和实验室研究的系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Apr;27(4):345-359. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_24_24. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
10
Evaluation of various obturation techniques with bioceramic sealers in 3D-printed C-shaped canals.评价不同的根管充填技术在 3D 打印 C 形根管中应用于生物陶瓷封闭剂的效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 12;24(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04334-2.