Ye Yicheng, Hosseinpour Sepanta, Wen Juan, Peters Ove A
School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4006, Australia.
Materials (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;18(15):3717. doi: 10.3390/ma18153717.
The development of bioactive materials in endodontics has advanced tissue regeneration by enhancing the biological responses of periradicular tissues. Recently, calcium silicate-based sealers have gained attention for their superior biological properties, including biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and cementogenic potential. This study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity, biocompatibility, and bioactivity of EndoSequence BC Sealer (ES BC) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHP BC) using human periodontal ligament stromal cells (hPDLSCs). Biocompatibility was assessed using MTT, Live/Dead, and wound healing assays. ES BC and AHP BC demonstrated significantly higher cell viability and proliferation compared to AH Plus used as a control. Gene expression analysis via real-time quantitative PCR demonstrated that ES BC, especially in set form, significantly upregulated osteogenic markers-alkaline phosphatase (2.49 ± 0.10, < 0.01), runt-related transcription factor 2 (2.33 ± 0.13), and collagen type I alpha 1 chain (2.85 ± 0.40, < 0.001)-more than cementogenic markers (cementum protein 1, cementum attachment protein, and cementum protein 23). This differential response may reflect the fibroblast-dominant nature of hPDLSCs, which contain limited cementoblast-like cells. This study supports the superior biocompatibility and regenerative capacity of ES BC and AHP BC compared to AH Plus. While in vitro models provide foundational insights, advanced ex vivo approaches are crucial for translating findings to clinical practice.
牙髓病学中生物活性材料的发展通过增强根尖周组织的生物学反应促进了组织再生。最近,硅酸钙基封闭剂因其优异的生物学特性,包括生物相容性、骨传导性和成牙骨质潜力而受到关注。本研究旨在使用人牙周膜基质细胞(hPDLSCs)评估EndoSequence BC封闭剂(ES BC)和AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂(AHP BC)的细胞毒性、生物相容性和生物活性。使用MTT、活/死和伤口愈合试验评估生物相容性。与用作对照的AH Plus相比,ES BC和AHP BC表现出显著更高的细胞活力和增殖。通过实时定量PCR进行的基因表达分析表明,ES BC,尤其是凝固后的形式,显著上调了成骨标志物——碱性磷酸酶(2.49±0.10,<0.01)、 runt相关转录因子2(2.33±0.13)和I型胶原蛋白α1链(2.85±0.40,<0.001)——上调程度超过成牙骨质标志物(牙骨质蛋白1、牙骨质附着蛋白和牙骨质蛋白23)。这种差异反应可能反映了hPDLSCs以成纤维细胞为主的性质,其中成牙骨质样细胞数量有限。本研究支持ES BC和AHP BC与AH Plus相比具有更好的生物相容性和再生能力。虽然体外模型提供了基础见解,但先进的体外方法对于将研究结果转化为临床实践至关重要。