Desai Anjali V, Klimek Virginia M, Wan Peter J, Heinberg Aileen, Anderson Kelley L, Bernal Camila, Nelson Judith E
Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 26. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002865.
Evidence-based guidelines call for integration of palliative care within oncology from diagnosis. Misperceptions about palliative care have impeded implementation. Prior research has not examined perceptions about 'palliative care' versus 'supportive care' among patients and caregivers to whom this care is introduced routinely as part of comprehensive cancer care. We conducted a qualitative study of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and their informal caregivers to elicit perceptions of 'palliative care' and 'supportive care' before and after they received integrated primary/specialist palliative care from diagnosis.
Patients with newly diagnosed MDS and caregivers were interviewed about their understanding of 'palliative care' and 'supportive care' at diagnosis and follow-up. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed by an interdisciplinary team.
Forty-eight interviews were conducted in total, including with 21 patients and 13 caregivers at diagnosis, and 10 patients and 4 caregivers at follow-up. Initially, 28/34 participants (82%) associated 'palliative care' with death or fear/alarm. At follow-up, 11/14 participants (79%) recognised that 'palliative care' is not only for terminally ill patients, yet 13/14 participants (93%) still felt apprehensive about the term. Initially, 24/34 participants (71%) felt 'supportive care' sounded 'positive' and 12/14 participants (86%) reported this at follow-up. No participant associated 'supportive care' with death or fear/alarm at either time point. Among participants who had a preference, 'supportive care' was the preferred term initially and at follow-up.
Patients with MDS and caregivers receiving integrated primary/specialist palliative care from diagnosis responded more favourably to and felt less apprehensive about 'supportive care', initially and at follow-up.
循证指南要求从诊断开始就在肿瘤学中整合姑息治疗。对姑息治疗的误解阻碍了其实施。既往研究尚未考察在作为综合癌症治疗常规组成部分接受这种治疗的患者和照护者中,他们对“姑息治疗”与“支持性护理”的看法。我们对骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者及其非正式照护者进行了一项定性研究,以了解他们在从诊断开始接受初级/专科姑息综合治疗之前和之后对“姑息治疗”和“支持性护理”的看法。
对新诊断的MDS患者及其照护者就他们在诊断时和随访时对“姑息治疗”和“支持性护理”的理解进行访谈。访谈进行录音、转录,并由一个跨学科团队进行分析。
总共进行了48次访谈,包括诊断时对21名患者和13名照护者的访谈,以及随访时对10名患者和4名照护者的访谈。最初,34名参与者中有28名(82%)将“姑息治疗”与死亡或恐惧/担忧联系起来。在随访时,14名参与者中有11名(79%)认识到“姑息治疗”不仅适用于晚期患者,但14名参与者中有13名(93%)仍然对这个术语感到担忧。最初,34名参与者中有24名(71%)觉得“支持性护理”听起来“积极”,14名参与者中有12名(86%)在随访时也这样表示。在两个时间点上,没有参与者将“支持性护理”与死亡或恐惧/担忧联系起来。在有偏好的参与者中,“支持性护理”在最初和随访时都是首选术语。
从诊断开始接受初级/专科姑息综合治疗的MDS患者及其照护者,在最初和随访时对“支持性护理”的反应更积极,担忧也更少。