• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业-营养-健康研究中的公平性:范围综述。

Equity in agriculture-nutrition-health research: a scoping review.

机构信息

Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Nutr Rev. 2021 Dec 8;80(1):78-90. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab001.

DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuab001
PMID:33907802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8664535/
Abstract

Links among agriculture, nutrition, and health (ANH) are established, but the role of inequity is less understood. In this scoping review, we aimed to understand the range of ways that ANH research addresses inequity issues in low- and middle-income countries. We used PRISMA guidelines to structure our study. From an initial >26 000 studies, 243 published reports met inclusion criteria and were mapped. The number of reports addressing inequity in ANH research has increased over time from < 10 articles in 2008 to > 40 in 2018. Within equity, a majority of articles (n = 327) focused on describing how nutrition and health outcomes differ for different groups. Many (n = 134) looked at the material circumstances that shape people's life chances. Fewer (n = 51) looked at the most basic structural determinants of (in)equity. The same aspects of equity remain the least studied in ANH research, including the intersections of equity issues shaping life chances, and inequity's structural determinants. We suggest ways forward for this community, drawing on conceptual frameworks and theory of inequity from different disciplines.

摘要

农业、营养与健康(ANH)之间存在关联,但人们对不平等问题的认识还不够充分。在本次范围综述中,我们旨在了解 ANH 研究在中低收入国家解决不平等问题的各种方式。我们使用 PRISMA 指南来组织研究。最初有超过 26000 项研究,其中 243 篇已发表的报告符合纳入标准并进行了映射。随着时间的推移,ANH 研究中涉及不平等问题的报告数量有所增加,从 2008 年的不足 10 篇增加到 2018 年的 40 多篇。在公平性方面,大多数文章(n=327)侧重于描述不同群体的营养和健康结果有何差异。许多文章(n=134)着眼于塑造人们生活机会的物质环境。较少的文章(n=51)关注(不平等)的最基本结构决定因素。ANH 研究中对公平性的同样方面仍研究得最少,包括影响生活机会的公平问题的交叉点以及不公平的结构决定因素。我们借鉴不同学科的公平问题概念框架和理论,为该领域提出了前进的方向。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/fbebc742fb05/nuab001f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/46dc93ebfa63/nuab001f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/5f0a7c7f3d03/nuab001f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/cc7aae379847/nuab001f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/1ff4f6dfba39/nuab001f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/fbebc742fb05/nuab001f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/46dc93ebfa63/nuab001f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/5f0a7c7f3d03/nuab001f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/cc7aae379847/nuab001f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/1ff4f6dfba39/nuab001f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9418/8664535/fbebc742fb05/nuab001f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Equity in agriculture-nutrition-health research: a scoping review.农业-营养-健康研究中的公平性:范围综述。
Nutr Rev. 2021 Dec 8;80(1):78-90. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab001.
2
The impact of gender equity in agriculture on nutritional status, diets, and household food security: a mixed-methods systematic review.农业性别平等对营养状况、饮食和家庭粮食安全的影响:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 29;5(3):e002173. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002173. eCollection 2020.
3
Equity of access to palliative care: a scoping review.公平获得姑息治疗的机会:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 25;23(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02321-1.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
A scoping review of equity-focused implementation theories, models and frameworks in healthcare and their application in addressing ethnicity-related health inequities.卫生保健中以公平为重点的实施理论、模型和框架的范围综述及其在解决与族裔有关的健康不平等问题中的应用。
Implement Sci. 2023 Oct 16;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13012-023-01304-0.
6
Equity in Economic Evaluations of Early Childhood Development Interventions in Low-and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.经济评估中的公平性:对中低收入国家幼儿发展干预措施的范围综述。
Matern Child Health J. 2023 Jun;27(6):1009-1029. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03650-3. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
7
Emerging professional practices focusing on reducing inequity in speech-language therapy and audiology: a scoping review.聚焦于减少言语治疗和听力学领域不公平现象的新兴专业实践:范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Mar 10;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01815-0.
8
Social Factors Associated With Nutrition Risk in Community-Dwelling Older Adults in High-Income Countries: Protocol for a Scoping Review.与高收入国家社区居住的老年人营养风险相关的社会因素:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 25;13:e56714. doi: 10.2196/56714.
9
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity in Oncology: Scoping Review.人工智能对肿瘤学中健康公平性的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 1;24(11):e39748. doi: 10.2196/39748.
10
Intersections of Climate Change with Food Systems, Nutrition, and Health: An Overview and Evidence Map.气候变化与食物系统、营养和健康的交集:概述和证据图谱。
Adv Nutr. 2024 Sep;15(9):100274. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100274. Epub 2024 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Caste, wealth and geographic equity in program reach and expected outcomes: an exploratory analyses of in Nepal.种姓、财富与项目覆盖范围及预期成果中的地域公平性:尼泊尔的一项探索性分析
Front Nutr. 2024 Dec 30;11:1464902. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1464902. eCollection 2024.
2
Data reuse in agricultural genomics research: challenges and recommendations.农业基因组学研究中的数据重用:挑战与建议。
Gigascience. 2025 Jan 6;14. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae106.
3
Linking Agricultural Activity Frequency to Loneliness in Rural Hospital Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of gender equity in agriculture on nutritional status, diets, and household food security: a mixed-methods systematic review.农业性别平等对营养状况、饮食和家庭粮食安全的影响:一项混合方法系统评价。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Mar 29;5(3):e002173. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002173. eCollection 2020.
2
Affordability of the EAT-Lancet reference diet: a global analysis.EAT-柳叶刀参考饮食的负担能力:全球分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Jan;8(1):e59-e66. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30447-4. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
3
Gender, Assets, and Agricultural Development: Lessons from Eight Projects.
农村住院患者农业活动频率与孤独感的关联:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59909. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59909. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Measurement of diets that are healthy, environmentally sustainable, affordable, and equitable: A scoping review of metrics, findings, and research gaps.对健康、环境可持续、可负担且公平的饮食进行衡量:对指标、研究结果及研究差距的范围综述。
Front Nutr. 2023 Apr 3;10:1125955. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1125955. eCollection 2023.
5
Exploring consumers' environmental ethical preferences in the context of unmanned aerial vehicle utilization for plant protection.探讨消费者在植保无人机使用背景下的环境伦理偏好。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 6;13(1):3716. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30557-4.
6
Holding no-one back: The Nutrition Equity Framework in theory and practice.不让任何人掉队:营养公平框架的理论与实践
Glob Food Sec. 2022 Mar;32. doi: 10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100605. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
7
Sustainable food systems and nutrition in the 21st century: a report from the 22nd annual Harvard Nutrition Obesity Symposium.21 世纪的可持续食物体系与营养:第 22 届哈佛营养肥胖研讨会报告
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;115(1):18-33. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab315.
8
The Basic Determinants of Malnutrition: Resources, Structures, Ideas and Power.营养不良的基本决定因素:资源、结构、观念和权力。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2021 Dec 1;10(12):817-827. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.259.
性别、资产与农业发展:八个项目的经验教训
World Dev. 2016 Jul;83:295-311. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.01.009.
4
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.系统评价或范围综述?在选择系统评价或范围综述方法时,作者的指南。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
5
Can Integrated Agriculture-Nutrition Programmes Change Gender Norms on Land and Asset Ownership? Evidence from Burkina Faso.综合农业营养计划能否改变土地和资产所有权方面的性别规范?来自布基纳法索的证据。
J Dev Stud. 2015 Aug 27;51(9):1155-1174. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2015.1036036. eCollection 2015.
6
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
7
Taking stock of the social determinants of health: A scoping review.评估健康的社会决定因素:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0177306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177306. eCollection 2017.
8
Reducing Anemia Prevalence in Afghanistan: Socioeconomic Correlates and the Particular Role of Agricultural Assets.降低阿富汗贫血患病率:社会经济关联因素及农业资产的特殊作用
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 6;11(6):e0156878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156878. eCollection 2016.
9
Addressing inequities in healthy eating.解决健康饮食方面的不平等问题。
Health Promot Int. 2015 Sep;30 Suppl 2:ii77-88. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav073.
10
[Social capital and health information in the context of small scale farmers' livelihoods].[小规模农户生计背景下的社会资本与健康信息]
Salud Colect. 2015 Jun;11(2):177-89. doi: 10.18294/sc.2015.682.