Suppr超能文献

农村环境、地区贫困程度、外部空间可达性和绿地与 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康有关吗?一项横断面研究(CHARIS-E)。

Are Rurality, Area Deprivation, Access to Outside Space, and Green Space Associated with Mental Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic? A Cross Sectional Study (CHARIS-E).

机构信息

Centre for Health Sciences, Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness 999020, UK.

Health Psychology Group, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen 999020, UK.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3869. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083869.

Abstract

The study investigated if rurality, area deprivation, access to outside space (Study 1), and frequency of visiting and duration in green space (Study 2) are associated with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic and examined if individual demographics (age, gender, COVID-19 shielding status) and illness beliefs have a direct association with mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. A serial, weekly, nationally representative, cross-sectional, observational study of randomly selected adults was conducted in Scotland during June and July 2020. If available, validated instruments were used to measure psychological distress, individual demographics, illness beliefs, and the following characteristics: Rurality, area deprivation, access to residential outside space, frequency of visiting, and duration in green space. Simple linear regressions followed by examination of moderation effect were conducted. There were 2969 participants in Study 1, of which 1765 (59.6%) were female, 349 (11.9%) were in the shielding category, and the median age was 54 years. There were 502 participants in Study 2, of which 295 (58.60%) were female, 58 (11.6%) were in shielding category, and the median age was 53 years. Direct effects showed that psychological distress was worse if participants reported the following: Urban, in a deprived area, no access to or sharing residential outside space, fewer visits to green space (environment), younger, female, in the shielding category (demographics), worse illness (COVID-19) representations, and greater threat perception (illness beliefs). Moderation analyses showed that environmental factors amplified the direct effects of the individual factors on psychological distress. This study offers pointers for public health and for environmental planning, design, and management, including housing design and public open space provision and regulation.

摘要

本研究调查了在 COVID-19 大流行期间,农村环境、地区贫困、户外空间可达性(研究 1)以及绿地使用频率和时长(研究 2)是否与心理健康相关,并探讨了个体人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、COVID-19 屏蔽状态)和疾病信念是否与 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康直接相关。这是一项在 2020 年 6 月至 7 月期间在苏格兰进行的、针对随机选择的成年人的、具有全国代表性的、连续的、每周一次的、横断面、观察性研究。如果有可用的、经过验证的工具,将用于测量心理困扰、个体人口统计学特征、疾病信念以及以下特征:农村环境、地区贫困、居住户外空间可达性、绿地使用频率和时长。进行简单线性回归分析,然后检查调节效应。研究 1 共有 2969 名参与者,其中 1765 名(59.6%)为女性,349 名(11.9%)为屏蔽类别,中位年龄为 54 岁。研究 2 有 502 名参与者,其中 295 名(58.60%)为女性,58 名(11.6%)为屏蔽类别,中位年龄为 53 岁。直接效应表明,如果参与者报告以下情况,心理困扰会更严重:城市环境、贫困地区、无法或共享居住户外空间、绿地(环境)访问次数较少、年龄较小、女性、处于屏蔽类别(人口统计学特征)、对疾病(COVID-19)的描述更差,以及对威胁的感知度更高(疾病信念)。调节分析表明,环境因素放大了个体因素对心理困扰的直接影响。本研究为公共卫生和环境规划、设计和管理提供了一些启示,包括住房设计和公共开放空间的提供和监管。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b16/8067699/5b13028dddcd/ijerph-18-03869-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验