Saw Nay Min Min Thaw, Suwanchaikasem Pipob, Zuniga-Montanez Rogelio, Qiu Guanglei, Marzinelli Ezequiel M, Wuertz Stefan, Williams Rohan B H
Singapore Centre for Environmental Life Sciences Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551, Singapore.
Singapore Phenome Centre, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 636921, Singapore.
Metabolites. 2021 Apr 26;11(5):269. doi: 10.3390/metabo11050269.
Metabolome profiling is becoming more commonly used in the study of complex microbial communities and microbiomes; however, to date, little information is available concerning appropriate extraction procedures. We studied the influence of different extraction solvent mixtures on untargeted metabolomics analysis of two continuous culture enrichment communities performing enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR), with each enrichment targeting distinct populations of polyphosphate-accumulating organisms (PAOs). We employed one non-polar solvent and up to four polar solvents for extracting metabolites from biomass. In one of the reactor microbial communities, we surveyed both intracellular and extracellular metabolites using the same set of solvents. All samples were analysed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS). UPLC-MS data obtained from polar and non-polar solvents were analysed separately and evaluated using extent of repeatability, overall extraction capacity and the extent of differential abundance between physiological states. Despite both reactors demonstrating the same bioprocess phenotype, the most appropriate extraction method was biomass specific, with methanol: water (50:50 /) and methanol: chloroform: water (40:40:20 /) being chosen as the most appropriate for each of the two different bioreactors, respectively. Our approach provides new data on the influence of solvent choice on the untargeted surveys of the metabolome of PAO enriched EBPR communities and suggests that metabolome extraction methods need to be carefully tailored to the specific complex microbial community under study.
代谢组学分析在复杂微生物群落和微生物组研究中的应用越来越普遍;然而,迄今为止,关于合适的提取程序的信息却很少。我们研究了不同提取溶剂混合物对两个进行强化生物除磷(EBPR)的连续培养富集群落的非靶向代谢组学分析的影响,每个富集群落针对不同的聚磷积累生物体(PAO)种群。我们使用一种非极性溶剂和多达四种极性溶剂从生物质中提取代谢物。在其中一个反应器微生物群落中,我们使用同一组溶剂对细胞内和细胞外代谢物进行了检测。所有样品均采用超高效液相色谱质谱联用仪(UPLC-MS)进行分析。分别分析了从极性和非极性溶剂获得的UPLC-MS数据,并使用重复性程度、总体提取能力以及生理状态之间的差异丰度程度进行评估。尽管两个反应器表现出相同的生物过程表型,但最合适的提取方法因生物质而异,甲醇:水(50:50 /)和甲醇:氯仿:水(40:40:20 /)分别被选为两种不同生物反应器各自最合适的提取方法。我们的方法提供了关于溶剂选择对PAO富集的EBPR群落代谢组非靶向检测影响的新数据,并表明代谢组提取方法需要根据所研究的特定复杂微生物群落进行精心调整。