Yao Anthony D, Cheng Derrick L, Pan Ian, Kitamura Felipe
Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Box G-9280, 222 Richmond St, Providence, RI (A.D.Y., D.L.C., I.P.); and Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (F.K.).
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Mar 4;2(2):e190026. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190026. eCollection 2020 Mar.
To systematically review and synthesize the current literature and to develop a compendium of technical characteristics of existing deep learning applications in neuroradiology.
A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review was conducted through September 1, 2019, using PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. A total of 155 articles discussing deep learning applications in neuroimaging were identified, divided by imaging modality, and characterized by imaging task, data source, algorithm type, and outcome metrics.
A total of 155 studies were identified and divided into: MRI ( = 115), functional MRI ( = 19), CT ( = 9), PET ( = 18), and US ( = 1). Seven were multimodal. MRI applications were described in 74%, and 76 (49%) were tasked with image segmentation. Of the 155 articles identified in this study, 65 (42%) were tested on institutional data; only 16 were validated against publicly available data. In addition, 53 studies (34%) used a combined dataset of less than 100, and 124 (80%) used a combined dataset of less than 1000.
Although deep learning has demonstrated potential for each of these modalities, this review highlights several needs in the field of deep learning research including use of internal datasets without external validation, unavailability of implementation methods, inconsistent assessment metrics, and lack of clinical validation. However, the rapid growth of deep learning in neuroradiology holds promise and, as strides are made to improve standardization, generalizability, and reproducibility, it may soon play a role in clinical diagnosis and treatment of neurologic disorders.© RSNA, 2020.
系统回顾和综合当前文献,编写一份关于神经放射学中现有深度学习应用技术特征的概要。
通过使用PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库,对截至2019年9月1日的文献进行了系统评价和Meta分析。共识别出155篇讨论深度学习在神经影像学中应用的文章,按成像模态进行分类,并根据成像任务、数据源、算法类型和结果指标进行特征描述。
共识别出155项研究,分为:磁共振成像(MRI,n = 115)、功能磁共振成像(n = 19)、计算机断层扫描(CT,n = 9)、正电子发射断层显像(PET,n = 18)和超声(US,n = 1)。7项为多模态研究。MRI应用占74%,其中76项(49%)的任务是图像分割。在本研究识别出的155篇文章中,65篇(42%)在机构数据上进行了测试;只有16篇针对公开可用数据进行了验证。此外,53项研究(34%)使用了少于100的组合数据集,124项研究(80%)使用了少于1000的组合数据集。
尽管深度学习在这些模态中的每一种都显示出潜力,但本综述强调了深度学习研究领域的几个需求,包括使用未经外部验证的内部数据集、缺乏实施方法、评估指标不一致以及缺乏临床验证。然而,深度学习在神经放射学中的快速发展前景广阔,随着在提高标准化、可推广性和可重复性方面取得进展,它可能很快在神经系统疾病的临床诊断和治疗中发挥作用。©RSNA,2020。