NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Sport and Exercise Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Obes Rev. 2021 Jul;22 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):e13239. doi: 10.1111/obr.13239. Epub 2021 May 3.
This systematic review examined the effect of exercise training interventions on physical fitness in adults with overweight or obesity and compared the effectiveness of different types of exercise training. Four electronic databases were searched. Articles were included if they described randomized controlled trials of exercise training interventions and their effect on maximal oxygen consumption or muscle strength in adults with overweight or obesity. Changes in outcome parameters were analyzed using random effects meta-analyses for different training types (aerobic, resistance, combined aerobic plus resistance, and high-intensity interval training). Eighty-eight articles satisfied the inclusion criteria of which 66 (3964 participants) could be included in the meta-analyses. All training types increased VO (mean difference 3.82 ml/min/kg (95% CI 3.17, 4.48), P < 0.00001; I = 48%). In direct comparisons, resistance training was less effective in improving VO than aerobic training, HIIT was slightly more effective than aerobic training, and no difference between aerobic and combined aerobic plus resistance training was found. For muscle strength benefits, incorporation of resistance exercise in the training program is indicated. Exercise training increases VO and muscle strength in adults with overweight or obesity. Differences between training types should be weighed with other needs and preferences when health professionals advise on exercise training to improve physical fitness.
本系统评价考察了运动训练干预对超重或肥胖成年人身体适应性的影响,并比较了不同类型运动训练的效果。共检索了四个电子数据库。纳入描述了运动训练干预及其对超重或肥胖成年人最大摄氧量或肌肉力量影响的随机对照试验的文章。使用随机效应荟萃分析,分析了不同训练类型(有氧、抗阻、有氧加抗阻联合和高强度间歇训练)的结局参数变化。有 88 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中 66 篇(3964 名参与者)可纳入荟萃分析。所有训练类型均能增加 VO₂(平均差异 3.82 ml/min/kg[95%CI 3.17, 4.48],P<0.00001;I²=48%)。直接比较显示,抗阻训练在提高 VO₂方面不如有氧训练有效,高强度间歇训练比有氧训练略有效,而有氧和有氧加抗阻联合训练之间没有差异。对于肌肉力量的益处,训练计划中加入抗阻运动是有益的。运动训练可以增加超重或肥胖成年人的 VO₂和肌肉力量。在健康专业人员建议进行运动训练以提高身体适应性时,应权衡不同训练类型之间的差异,并考虑其他需求和偏好。