• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

县级层面新冠疫情防控社交距离措施的社会经济与政治预测因素

County-Level Socioeconomic and Political Predictors of Distancing for COVID-19.

作者信息

Kavanagh Nolan M, Goel Rishi R, Venkataramani Atheendar S

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.040
PMID:33947527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7988444/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, governments have implemented social distancing measures to slow viral transmission. This work aims to determine the extent to which socioeconomic and political conditions have shaped community-level distancing behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially how these dynamics have evolved over time.

METHODS

This study used daily data on physical distancing from 15‒17 million cell phone users in 3,037 U.S. counties. County-level changes in the average distance traveled per person were estimated relative to prepandemic weeks as a proxy for physical distancing. Pooled ordinary least squares regressions estimated the association between physical distancing and a variety of county-level demographic, socioeconomic, and political characteristics by week from March 9, 2020 to January 17, 2021. Data were collected until January 2021, at which point the analyses were finalized.

RESULTS

Lower per capita income and greater Republican orientation were associated with significantly reduced physical distancing throughout nearly all the study period. These associations persisted after adjusting for a variety of county-level demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Other county-level characteristics, such as the shares of Black and Hispanic residents, were associated with reduced distancing at various points during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the importance of dynamic socioeconomic and political gradients in preventive behavior and imply the need for nimble policy responses.

摘要

引言

为应对新冠疫情,各国政府已实施社交距离措施以减缓病毒传播。这项工作旨在确定社会经济和政治状况在新冠疫情期间对社区层面社交距离行为的影响程度,特别是这些动态如何随时间演变。

方法

本研究使用了来自美国3037个县1500万至1700万手机用户的每日身体距离数据。相对于疫情前的几周,估计了各县人均出行距离的变化,以此作为身体距离的代理指标。通过2020年3月9日至2021年1月17日按周进行的混合普通最小二乘法回归,估计了身体距离与各县各种人口、社会经济和政治特征之间的关联。数据收集截至2021年1月,此时分析工作最终完成。

结果

在几乎整个研究期间,人均收入较低和共和党倾向较强与身体距离显著降低相关。在调整了各县的各种人口和社会经济特征后,这些关联依然存在。其他县级特征,如黑人和西班牙裔居民的比例,在研究期间的不同时间点与社交距离的降低有关。

结论

这些结果凸显了动态社会经济和政治梯度在预防行为中的重要性,并意味着需要灵活的政策应对措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/1587ac047f90/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/157b7627d2c0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/e3575b2830d7/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/1587ac047f90/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/157b7627d2c0/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/e3575b2830d7/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b78f/7988444/1587ac047f90/gr3_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
County-Level Socioeconomic and Political Predictors of Distancing for COVID-19.县级层面新冠疫情防控社交距离措施的社会经济与政治预测因素
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Jul;61(1):13-19. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.01.040. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
2
County-Level Social Distancing and Policy Impact in the United States: A Dynamical Systems Model.县级社会隔离与美国政策影响:动态系统模型。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Dec 23;6(4):e23902. doi: 10.2196/23902.
3
Differential impact of mitigation policies and socioeconomic status on COVID-19 prevalence and social distancing in the United States.缓解政策和社会经济地位对美国 COVID-19 患病率和社会隔离的差异影响。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 14;21(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11149-1.
4
Socioeconomic Disparities in Social Distancing During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States: Observational Study.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间社会隔离的社会经济差异:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 22;23(1):e24591. doi: 10.2196/24591.
5
Cell Phone Activity in Categories of Places and Associations With Growth in Cases of COVID-19 in the US.手机活动与美国 COVID-19 病例增长的场所类别和关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1614-1620. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4288.
6
Association of Social Distancing, Population Density, and Temperature With the Instantaneous Reproduction Number of SARS-CoV-2 in Counties Across the United States.社交距离、人口密度和温度与美国各县 SARS-CoV-2 瞬时繁殖数的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e2016099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.16099.
7
Disparities in COVID-19 mortality by county racial composition and the role of spring social distancing measures.按县种族构成划分的 COVID-19 死亡率差异及春季社会隔离措施的作用。
Econ Hum Biol. 2021 May;41:100953. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2020.100953. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
8
Association between mobility patterns and COVID-19 transmission in the USA: a mathematical modelling study.美国移动模式与 COVID-19 传播的关联:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Nov;20(11):1247-1254. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30553-3. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
Social Distancing Associations with COVID-19 Infection and Mortality Are Modified by Crowding and Socioeconomic Status.社会隔离与 COVID-19 感染和死亡率的关联受到拥挤和社会经济地位的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 28;18(9):4680. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094680.
10
Outcomes Associated With Social Distancing Policies in St Louis, Missouri, During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic.密苏里州圣路易斯市在 COVID-19 大流行早期实施社交距离政策的相关结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2123374. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23374.

引用本文的文献

1
A framework for modeling county-level COVID-19 transmission.一个用于模拟县级新冠病毒传播的框架。
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;13:1608360. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1608360. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of health and health systems in shaping political engagement and rebuilding trust in democratic institutions.健康及卫生系统在塑造政治参与和重建对民主体制的信任方面所发挥的作用。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 14;53:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101326. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Face mask mandates alter major determinants of adherence to protective health behaviours in Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Neighbourhood income and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States.美国 COVID-19 大流行期间的邻里收入与物理隔离。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Dec;4(12):1294-1302. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00998-2. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic.党派之间在保持社交距离方面的分歧与 COVID-19 大流行期间的健康结果有关。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1186-1197. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Correction: Social distancing to slow the US COVID-19 epidemic: Longitudinal pretest-posttest comparison group study.
口罩强制令改变了澳大利亚遵守保护性健康行为的主要决定因素。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Mar 26;12(3):241941. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241941. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Change in prevalence of smoking during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic among middle-aged and older adults in Canada: a cohort study of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.加拿大中老年人在新冠疫情大流行第一年的吸烟流行率变化:加拿大老龄化纵向研究的队列研究
BMJ Public Health. 2024 Nov 29;2(2):e001175. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001175. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Heterogeneity of the Association Between Obesity and COVID-19 Mortality and the Roles of Policy Interventions: U.S. National-Level Analysis.肥胖与新冠病毒疾病死亡率之间关联的异质性及政策干预的作用:美国国家级分析
AJPM Focus. 2024 Dec 4;4(3):100312. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100312. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
A Study of Cumulative COVID-19 Mortality Trends Associated with Ethnic-Racial Composition, Income Inequality, and Party Inclination among US Counties.一项关于与美国县的种族构成、收入不平等和党派倾向相关的 COVID-19 累积死亡率趋势的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;19(23):15803. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315803.
7
Area-level inequalities in Covid-19 outcomes in Brazil in 2020 and 2021: An analysis of 1,894,165 severe Covid-19 cases.2020 年和 2021 年巴西新冠病毒病结局的地区不平等:对 1894165 例严重新冠病毒病病例的分析。
Prev Med. 2022 Nov;164:107298. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107298. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
8
Role of COVID-19 Anxiety and Community Risk Factors on Physical Distancing Practice.新冠焦虑及社区风险因素对保持社交距离行为的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Apr 16;12(4):110. doi: 10.3390/bs12040110.
9
U.S. regional differences in physical distancing: Evaluating racial and socioeconomic divides during the COVID-19 pandemic.美国在物理隔离方面的地区差异:评估 COVID-19 大流行期间的种族和社会经济差距。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 30;16(11):e0259665. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259665. eCollection 2021.
10
Nationwide Deployment of a Serious Game Designed to Improve COVID-19 Infection Prevention Practices in Switzerland: Prospective Web-Based Study.在瑞士全国范围内部署一款旨在改善新冠病毒感染预防措施的严肃游戏:基于网络的前瞻性研究。
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Nov 25;9(4):e33003. doi: 10.2196/33003.
更正:保持社交距离以减缓美国新冠疫情:纵向前后测比较组研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003376. eCollection 2020 Oct.
4
Political partisanship influences behavioral responses to governors' recommendations for COVID-19 prevention in the United States.政治党派偏见影响美国民众对州长新冠防疫建议的行为反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Sep 29;117(39):24144-24153. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007835117. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
5
Elusive consensus: Polarization in elite communication on the COVID-19 pandemic. elusive consensus: 极化的精英沟通在新冠大流行中
Sci Adv. 2020 Jul 10;6(28):eabc2717. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abc2717. eCollection 2020 Jul.
6
Association of Mobile Phone Location Data Indications of Travel and Stay-at-Home Mandates With COVID-19 Infection Rates in the US.手机定位数据显示的出行和居家令与美国 COVID-19 感染率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2020485. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20485.
7
Cell Phone Activity in Categories of Places and Associations With Growth in Cases of COVID-19 in the US.手机活动与美国 COVID-19 病例增长的场所类别和关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1614-1620. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.4288.
8
Income Disparities In Access To Critical Care Services.获取重症监护服务的机会存在收入差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Aug;39(8):1362-1367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00581.
9
Social distancing responses to COVID-19 emergency declarations strongly differentiated by income.对 COVID-19 紧急声明的社会隔离反应因收入而有很大差异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 18;117(33):19658-19660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2009412117. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
10
Structural Racism, Social Risk Factors, and Covid-19 - A Dangerous Convergence for Black Americans.结构性种族主义、社会风险因素与新冠疫情——美国黑人面临的危险交集
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):e77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2023616. Epub 2020 Jul 22.