Suppr超能文献

女性更喜欢剖宫产吗?对其观点和经验的定性证据综合分析。

Do women prefer caesarean sections? A qualitative evidence synthesis of their views and experiences.

机构信息

Montevideo Clinical and Epidemiological Research Unit, Montevideo, Uruguay.

UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 5;16(5):e0251072. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251072. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Caesarean sections (CS) continue to increase worldwide. Multiple and complex factors are contributing to the increase, including non-clinical factors related to individual women, families and their interactions with health providers. This global qualitative evidence synthesis explores women's preferences for mode of birth and factors underlying preferences for CS.

METHODS

Systematic database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) were conducted in December 2016 and updated in May 2019 and February 2021. Studies conducted across all resource settings were eligible for inclusion, except those from China and Taiwan which have been reported in a companion publication. Phenomena of interest were opinions, views and perspectives of women regarding preferences for mode of birth, attributes of CS, societal and cultural beliefs about modes of birth, and right to choose mode of birth. Thematic synthesis of data was conducted. Confidence in findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.

RESULTS

We included 52 studies, from 28 countries, encompassing the views and perspectives of pregnant women, non-pregnant women, women with previous CS, postpartum women, and women's partners. Most of the studies were conducted in high-income countries and published between 2011 and 2021. Factors underlying women preferences for CS had to do mainly with strong fear of pain and injuries to the mother and child during labour or birth (High confidence), uncertainty regarding vaginal birth (High confidence), and positive views or perceived advantages of CS (High confidence). Women who preferred CS expressed resoluteness about it, but there were also many women who had a clear preference for vaginal birth and those who even developed strategies to keep their birth plans in environments that were not supportive of vaginal births (High confidence). The findings also identified that social, cultural and personal factors as well as attributes related to health systems impact on the reasons underlying women preferences for various modes of birth (High confidence).

CONCLUSIONS

A wide variety of factors underlie women's preferences for CS in the absence of medical indications. Major factors contributing to perceptions of CS as preferable include fear of pain, uncertainty with vaginal birth and positive views on CS. Interventions need to address these factors to reduce unnecessary CS.

摘要

背景

剖宫产(CS)在全球范围内持续增加。导致这种增长的因素有很多,包括与个体妇女、家庭及其与卫生保健提供者的相互作用有关的非临床因素。本全球定性证据综合研究探讨了妇女对分娩方式的偏好以及偏好 CS 的潜在因素。

方法

系统地在 2016 年 12 月和 2019 年 5 月以及 2021 年 2 月进行了数据库搜索(MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、PsycINFO)。符合纳入标准的研究来自所有资源环境,除了来自中国和台湾的研究,这些研究已在一篇相关的出版物中报道过。感兴趣的现象是妇女对分娩方式的偏好、CS 的属性、关于分娩方式的社会和文化信念以及选择分娩方式的权利的意见、观点和看法。对数据进行了主题综合。使用 GRADE-CERQual 评估研究结果的可信度。

结果

我们纳入了来自 28 个国家的 52 项研究,包括孕妇、未怀孕妇女、有剖宫产史的妇女、产后妇女和妇女伴侣的意见和观点。大多数研究是在高收入国家进行的,发表时间在 2011 年至 2021 年之间。妇女偏好 CS 的潜在因素主要与分娩过程中母亲和孩子的强烈恐惧有关疼痛和损伤(高可信度)、对阴道分娩的不确定性(高可信度)以及对 CS 的积极看法或认为 CS 具有优势(高可信度)。选择 CS 的妇女对此表示坚决,但也有许多妇女明确倾向于阴道分娩,甚至在不支持阴道分娩的环境中制定策略来保持自己的分娩计划(高可信度)。研究结果还发现,社会、文化和个人因素以及与卫生系统相关的因素会影响妇女对各种分娩方式偏好的原因(高可信度)。

结论

在没有医学指征的情况下,有多种因素导致妇女偏好 CS。导致 CS 被认为更可取的主要因素包括对疼痛的恐惧、对阴道分娩的不确定性以及对 CS 的积极看法。干预措施需要解决这些因素,以减少不必要的 CS。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b36c/8099111/e61ee2c1cd9e/pone.0251072.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验