• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于工具变量进行因果效应估计的一般控制函数。

General Control Functions for Causal Effect Estimation from Instrumental Variables.

作者信息

Puli Aahlad, Ranganath Rajesh

机构信息

Computer Science, New York University.

Computer Science, Center for Data Science, New York University.

出版信息

Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020 Dec;33:8440-8451.

PMID:33953525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8096518/
Abstract

Causal effect estimation relies on separating the variation in the outcome into parts due to the treatment and due to the confounders. To achieve this separation, practitioners often use external sources of randomness that only influence the treatment called instrumental variables (IVs). We study variables constructed from treatment and IV that help estimate effects, called control functions. We characterize general control functions for effect estimation in a meta-identification result. Then, we show that structural assumptions on the treatment process allow the construction of general control functions, thereby guaranteeing identification. To construct general control functions and estimate effects, we develop the general control function method (GCFN). GCFN's first stage called variational decoupling (VDE) constructs general control functions by recovering the residual variation in the treatment given the IV. Using VDE's control function, GCFN's second stage estimates effects via regression. Further, we develop semi-supervised GCFN to construct general control functions using subsets of data that have both IV and confounders observed as supervision; this needs no structural treatment process assumptions. We evaluate GCFN on low and high dimensional simulated data and on recovering the causal effect of slave export on modern community trust [30].

摘要

因果效应估计依赖于将结果的变化分为由处理因素和混杂因素导致的部分。为了实现这种分离,从业者通常会使用仅影响处理因素的外部随机性来源,即所谓的工具变量(IV)。我们研究由处理因素和工具变量构建的有助于估计效应的变量,即控制函数。我们在一个元识别结果中刻画了用于效应估计的一般控制函数。然后,我们表明对处理过程的结构假设允许构建一般控制函数,从而保证识别。为了构建一般控制函数并估计效应,我们开发了一般控制函数方法(GCFN)。GCFN的第一阶段称为变分解耦(VDE),通过恢复给定工具变量时处理因素中的残余变化来构建一般控制函数。利用VDE的控制函数,GCFN的第二阶段通过回归估计效应。此外,我们开发了半监督GCFN,使用同时观察到工具变量和混杂因素的数据子集作为监督来构建一般控制函数;这不需要处理过程的结构假设。我们在低维和高维模拟数据上以及在恢复奴隶出口对现代社区信任的因果效应方面对GCFN进行了评估[30]。

相似文献

1
General Control Functions for Causal Effect Estimation from Instrumental Variables.基于工具变量进行因果效应估计的一般控制函数。
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020 Dec;33:8440-8451.
2
Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.纵向观察性研究因果推断的工具变量与逆概率加权法
Stat Methods Med Res. 2004 Feb;13(1):17-48. doi: 10.1191/0962280204sm351ra.
3
Causal Estimation with Functional Confounders.具有函数性混杂因素的因果估计
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2020 Dec;33:5115-5125.
4
Discovering Ancestral Instrumental Variables for Causal Inference From Observational Data.从观测数据中发现用于因果推断的祖先工具变量。
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2024 Aug;35(8):11542-11552. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3262848. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology.药物流行病学中工具变量使用教程。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Apr;26(4):357-367. doi: 10.1002/pds.4158. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
On the use of kernel machines for Mendelian randomization.关于核机器在孟德尔随机化中的应用。
Quant Biol. 2017 Dec;5(4):368-379. doi: 10.1007/s40484-017-0124-3. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Instrumental variable estimation in a survival context.生存背景下的工具变量估计
Epidemiology. 2015 May;26(3):402-10. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000262.
8
Instrumental variables I: instrumental variables exploit natural variation in nonexperimental data to estimate causal relationships.工具变量法 I:工具变量利用非实验数据中的自然变化来估计因果关系。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1226-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
9
Instrumental variable specifications and assumptions for longitudinal analysis of mental health cost offsets.心理健康成本抵消纵向分析的工具变量规范与假设
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2012 Dec;12(4):254-272. doi: 10.1007/s10742-012-0097-7. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
10
Two robust tools for inference about causal effects with invalid instruments.两种稳健的工具,用于对无效工具变量的因果效应进行推断。
Biometrics. 2022 Mar;78(1):24-34. doi: 10.1111/biom.13415. Epub 2020 Dec 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Rethinking Nonlinear Instrumental Variable Models through Prediction Validity.通过预测有效性重新思考非线性工具变量模型
J Mach Learn Res. 2022;23.
2
From algorithms to action: improving patient care requires causality.从算法到行动:提高患者护理质量需要因果关系。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02513-3.
3
Robustness to Spurious Correlations Improves Semantic Out-of-Distribution Detection.对虚假相关性的鲁棒性可改善语义分布外检测。
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2023 Jun 27;37(12):15305-15312. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26785.
4
DIET: Conditional independence testing with marginal dependence measures of residual information.饮食:基于残余信息边际依赖度量的条件独立性检验
Proc Mach Learn Res. 2023 Apr;206:10343-10367.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimating causal effects in observational studies using Electronic Health Data: Challenges and (some) solutions.利用电子健康数据在观察性研究中估计因果效应:挑战与(一些)解决方案。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2013;1(3). doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1038.
2
Causal Inference and Observational Research: The Utility of Twins.因果推断与观察性研究:双胞胎的效用
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;5(5):546-56. doi: 10.1177/1745691610383511.
3
Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.双重稳健估计因果效应。
Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr 1;173(7):761-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq439. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
4
Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation.认知与非认知技能形成技术的评估
Econometrica. 2010 May 1;78(3):883-931. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6551.
5
Causation and causal inference in epidemiology.流行病学中的因果关系与因果推断
Am J Public Health. 2005;95 Suppl 1:S144-50. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.059204.