• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患有复杂疾病的儿童和儿科姑息治疗:患病率和需求的回顾性横断面调查。

Children with medical complexity and paediatric palliative care: a retrospective cross-sectional survey of prevalence and needs.

机构信息

Fondazione Hospice MT. C. Seràgnoli, Via Marconi 43/45 - 40010, BO, Bentivoglio, Italy.

Direzione Generale Cura della Persona, Salute e Welfare, Servizio Assistenza Ospedaliera, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Ital J Pediatr. 2021 May 12;47(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01059-8.

DOI:10.1186/s13052-021-01059-8
PMID:33980280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8117594/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have been defined (Cohen et al., Pediatrics 127: 529-538, 2011.) as an emerging population potentially eligible for PPC. The current study investigated the prevalence of children with medical complexities eligible for a local palliative care network, including a paediatric hospice.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional survey has been conducted using children clinical charts from 14 local health authorities of our region (Emilia Romagna, Italy).

RESULTS

The total number of children with life-limiting conditions was 601, with a mean age of 7.4 ± 4.8 years, a prevalence of 8.4/10.000 residents < 19 years of age and a heterogeneous presentation among the provinces in the region. Neurological diseases affect 51% of patients, followed by congenital diseases (21%) and pathologies originating in the perinatal period (6%), while only 4% of the patients had a cancer diagnosis. Patients are dependent from many devices and supports: 32% had a gastrostomy, 22% a respiratory support and 15% of patients had both of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Observed regional prevalence of complex needs is lower than that published from other European countries. More research is needed to raise awareness of palliative care for children with medical complexities in order to address specific needs.

摘要

背景

患有复杂疾病的儿童(CMC)的定义(Cohen 等人,儿科学杂志 127:529-538,2011)是一个新兴的潜在符合 PPC 资格的人群。本研究调查了当地姑息治疗网络(包括儿科临终关怀)有资格获得姑息治疗的患有复杂疾病的儿童的患病率。

方法

使用来自我们地区(意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅大区)的 14 个地方卫生当局的儿童临床图表进行了回顾性横断面调查。

结果

患有生命有限疾病的儿童总数为 601 名,平均年龄为 7.4±4.8 岁,患病率为 8.4/10.000 名年龄<19 岁的居民,且该地区各省份的表现存在差异。神经疾病影响 51%的患者,其次是先天性疾病(21%)和围产期起源的疾病(6%),而只有 4%的患者患有癌症。患者依赖于许多设备和支持:32%的患者有胃造口术,22%的患者有呼吸支持,15%的患者两者兼有。

结论

观察到的复杂需求的区域患病率低于其他欧洲国家公布的患病率。需要进行更多的研究来提高对患有复杂疾病的儿童姑息治疗的认识,以满足他们的特定需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/34b788d29b39/13052_2021_1059_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/b3875729b325/13052_2021_1059_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/9412514b950d/13052_2021_1059_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/34b788d29b39/13052_2021_1059_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/b3875729b325/13052_2021_1059_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/9412514b950d/13052_2021_1059_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bb88/8117594/34b788d29b39/13052_2021_1059_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Children with medical complexity and paediatric palliative care: a retrospective cross-sectional survey of prevalence and needs.患有复杂疾病的儿童和儿科姑息治疗:患病率和需求的回顾性横断面调查。
Ital J Pediatr. 2021 May 12;47(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13052-021-01059-8.
2
[Paediatric Palliative Care: What is different in children compared to adults?].[儿童姑息治疗:与成人相比,儿童的不同之处是什么?]
Ther Umsch. 2018 Jul;75(2):101-104. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a000973.
3
Provision of Palliative and Hospice Care to Children in the Community: A Population Study of Hospice Nurses.为社区儿童提供姑息治疗和临终关怀:临终关怀护士的人群研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb;57(2):241-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.509. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
Children with medical complexity and pediatric palliative care: Data by a respiratory intermediate care unit.患有复杂疾病的儿童和儿科姑息治疗:呼吸中级护理病房的数据。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2023 Mar;58(3):918-926. doi: 10.1002/ppul.26278. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
5
Palliative care in children in Wales: a study of provision and need.威尔士儿童的姑息治疗:一项关于服务提供与需求的研究。
Palliat Med. 2005 Mar;19(2):137-42. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm967oa.
6
Needs assessment and palliative care: the views of providers.需求评估与姑息治疗:提供者的观点
J Public Health Med. 1997 Dec;19(4):437-42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024674.
7
Strengths, Gaps, and Opportunities: Results of a Statewide Community Needs Assessment of Pediatric Palliative Care and Hospice Resources.优势、差距和机遇:全州儿科姑息治疗和临终关怀资源社区需求评估结果。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Sep;60(3):512-521.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.009. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
8
Hospitalization in children eligible for palliative care.适合姑息治疗的儿童的住院治疗。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Jun;13(6):711-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0308.
9
Hospices and palliative care for children: converging stories.儿童临终关怀和姑息治疗:交汇的故事。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Jun 19;130(1):81-88. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz012.
10
Prevalence and characteristics of patients with advanced chronic conditions in need of palliative care in the general population: a cross-sectional study.一般人群中需要姑息治疗的晚期慢性疾病患者的流行率和特征:一项横断面研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Apr;28(4):302-11. doi: 10.1177/0269216313518266. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Needs, status and future directions in palliative care for children with cancer: an insight into the Italian situation.癌症患儿姑息治疗的需求、现状及未来方向:意大利情况洞察
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;15:1582341. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1582341. eCollection 2025.
2
Defining and quantifying population-level need for children's palliative care: findings from a rapid scoping review.定义和量化儿童姑息治疗的人群需求:快速范围综述的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Aug 22;23(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01539-8.
3
Paediatric oncologists' perspectives on Strategic solutions to develop Integrated Cancer Palliative Care: feedback intervention theory as an explanatory Framework.

本文引用的文献

1
A Tool for the Evaluation of Clinical Needs and Eligibility to Pediatric Palliative Care: The Validation of the ACCAPED Scale.用于评估儿科姑息治疗临床需求和资格的工具:ACCAPED 量表的验证。
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):205-210. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0148. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
2
Response to Suffering of the Seriously Ill Child: A History of Palliative Care for Children.回应重病儿童的痛苦:儿童舒缓治疗的历史。
Pediatrics. 2020 Jan;145(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-1741. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
A consensus conference report on defining the eligibility criteria for pediatric palliative care in Italy.
儿科肿瘤学家对制定综合癌症姑息治疗战略解决方案的看法:反馈干预理论作为解释框架。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 May 22;23(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01462-y.
4
Prevalence and determinants of hip pain in non-ambulatory cerebral palsy children: a retrospective cohort study.非卧床脑瘫儿童髋痛的患病率及其决定因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;59(1):32-41. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07725-5. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
5
New insights in pediatrics in 2021: choices in allergy and immunology, critical care, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, haematology, infectious diseases, neonatology, neurology, nutrition, palliative care, respiratory tract illnesses and telemedicine.2021 年儿科领域的新见解:过敏与免疫学、重症监护、内分泌学、胃肠病学、遗传学、血液学、传染病学、新生儿学、神经病学、营养学、姑息治疗、呼吸道疾病和远程医疗领域的选择。
Ital J Pediatr. 2022 Nov 26;48(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13052-022-01374-8.
6
A Novel Hospital-to-Home System for Children With Medical Complexities: Usability Testing Study.一种针对患有复杂疾病儿童的新型医院到家系统:可用性测试研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 12;6(8):e34572. doi: 10.2196/34572.
7
Evaluation of an Electronic Medical Record Module for Nursing Documentation in Paediatric Palliative Care: Involvement of Nurses with a Think-Aloud Approach.评估电子病历模块在儿科姑息治疗护理文件记录中的应用:采用出声思维法让护士参与进来。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3637. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063637.
8
Participatory Design of a Medication Module in an Electronic Medical Record for Paediatric Palliative Care: A Think-Aloud Approach with Nurses and Physicians.儿科姑息治疗电子病历中药物治疗模块的参与式设计:与护士和医生的出声思考法
Children (Basel). 2022 Jan 6;9(1):82. doi: 10.3390/children9010082.
9
The First Step to Initiate Pediatric Palliative Care: Identify Patient Needs and Cooperation of Medical Staff.启动儿科姑息治疗的第一步:识别患者需求及医护人员的协作。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 9;10(1):127. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010127.
意大利制定儿科姑息治疗资格标准的共识会议报告。
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Jul 22;45(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0681-3.
4
Impact of the Regional Pediatric Palliative Care Network on the Care of Children on Long-Term Ventilation: Could the Availability of a Residential Solution into the Network Reduce the Duration of Intensive Care Unit Staying for These Patients?区域儿科姑息治疗网络对长期通气儿童护理的影响:网络中住院解决方案的可用性能否缩短这些患者在重症监护病房的停留时间?
J Pediatr Intensive Care. 2018 Jun;7(2):75-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1605369. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
5
Perinatal palliative care: a national survey in Italy.围产期姑息治疗:意大利的一项全国性调查。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Sep;104(5):F567-F568. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316327. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
6
Comparing Health Care Provider-Perceived Barriers to Pediatric Palliative Care Fifteen Years Ago and Today.比较十五年前和今天医疗保健提供者对儿科姑息治疗的感知障碍。
J Palliat Med. 2019 Feb;22(2):145-151. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0367. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
7
Update on Palliative Care for Pediatric Neurology.儿科神经病学姑息治疗的最新进展
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Feb;36(2):154-157. doi: 10.1177/1049909118786956. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
Defining Provider-Prioritized Domains of Quality in Pediatric Home-Based Hospice and Palliative Care: A Study of the Ohio Pediatric Palliative Care and End-of-Life Network.界定儿科居家舒缓疗护中以提供者为优先的质量范畴:俄亥俄州儿科舒缓疗护与临终关怀网络的研究。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Oct;21(10):1414-1435. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0056. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
9
Parents spend an average of nine hours a day providing palliative care for children at home and need to maintain an average of five life-saving devices.家长平均每天在家中为孩子提供姑息治疗 9 小时,需要维持平均 5 种救生设备。
Acta Paediatr. 2018 Feb;107(2):289-293. doi: 10.1111/apa.14098. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
10
Three years' experience with the first pediatric hospice in Asia.在亚洲首个儿科临终关怀机构的三年经验。
Brain Dev. 2017 Oct;39(9):783-790. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 May 31.