• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于深度学习的 CT 鉴别良恶性椎体骨折。

Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fracture on CT using deep learning.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.

Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9612-9619. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08014-5. Epub 2021 May 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00330-021-08014-5
PMID:33993335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8594282/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of deep learning using ResNet50 in differentiation of benign and malignant vertebral fracture on CT.

METHODS

A dataset of 433 patients confirmed with 296 malignant and 137 benign fractures was retrospectively selected from our spinal CT image database. A senior radiologist performed visual reading to evaluate six imaging features, and three junior radiologists gave diagnostic prediction. A ROI was placed on the most abnormal vertebrae, and the smallest square bounding box was generated. The input channel into ResNet50 network was 3, including the slice with its two neighboring slices. The diagnostic performance was evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation. After obtaining the malignancy probability from all slices in a patient, the highest probability was assigned to that patient to give the final diagnosis, using the threshold of 0.5.

RESULTS

Visual features such as soft tissue mass and bone destruction were highly suggestive of malignancy; the presence of a transverse fracture line was highly suggestive of a benign fracture. The reading by three radiologists with 5, 3, and 1 year of experience achieved an accuracy of 99%, 95.2%, and 92.8%, respectively. In ResNet50 analysis, the per-slice diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.90, 0.79, and 85%. When the slices were combined to ve per-patient diagnosis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.95, 0.80, and 88%.

CONCLUSION

Deep learning has become an important tool for the detection of fractures on CT. In this study, ResNet50 achieved good accuracy, which can be further improved with more cases and optimized methods for future clinical implementation.

KEY POINTS

• Deep learning using ResNet50 can yield a high accuracy for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fracture on CT. • The per-slice diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.90, 0.79, and 85% in deep learning using ResNet50 analysis. • The slices combined with per-patient diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.95, 0.80, and 88% in deep learning using ResNet50 analysis.

摘要

目的

评估 ResNet50 深度学习在 CT 鉴别良恶性椎体骨折中的性能。

方法

回顾性地从我们的脊柱 CT 图像数据库中选择了 433 例患者的数据,其中 296 例为恶性骨折,137 例为良性骨折。一名资深放射科医生进行了视觉阅读,以评估六个影像学特征,三名初级放射科医生进行了诊断预测。在最异常的椎骨上放置 ROI,并生成最小的正方形边界框。将 3 个切片(包括其相邻的 2 个切片)作为 ResNet50 网络的输入通道。使用 10 折交叉验证评估诊断性能。从患者的所有切片中获得恶性概率后,将最高概率分配给该患者,以 0.5 的阈值给出最终诊断。

结果

软组织肿块和骨破坏等视觉特征高度提示恶性;存在横向骨折线高度提示良性骨折。具有 5 年、3 年和 1 年经验的三位放射科医生的阅读准确率分别为 99%、95.2%和 92.8%。在 ResNet50 分析中,每片的诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 0.90、0.79 和 85%。当将切片组合为每个患者的 5 个诊断时,敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 0.95、0.80 和 88%。

结论

深度学习已成为 CT 骨折检测的重要工具。在这项研究中,ResNet50 达到了很高的准确性,未来通过更多病例和优化方法可以进一步提高其准确性,以用于临床实施。

关键点

•ResNet50 深度学习可实现 CT 鉴别良恶性椎体骨折的高准确性。•ResNet50 深度学习的每片诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 0.90、0.79 和 85%。•ResNet50 深度学习的每例患者诊断的切片组合敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为 0.95、0.80 和 88%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/c4c0a3ec09ed/nihms-1748200-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/4de6b84224cb/nihms-1748200-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/2f76cad95a81/nihms-1748200-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/53ffce8458c2/nihms-1748200-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/5b271f7a9ecf/nihms-1748200-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/95fcb9542914/nihms-1748200-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/c4c0a3ec09ed/nihms-1748200-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/4de6b84224cb/nihms-1748200-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/2f76cad95a81/nihms-1748200-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/53ffce8458c2/nihms-1748200-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/5b271f7a9ecf/nihms-1748200-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/95fcb9542914/nihms-1748200-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd7e/8594282/c4c0a3ec09ed/nihms-1748200-f0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral fracture on CT using deep learning.基于深度学习的 CT 鉴别良恶性椎体骨折。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Dec;31(12):9612-9619. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08014-5. Epub 2021 May 16.
2
A deep learning-based method for the diagnosis of vertebral fractures on spine MRI: retrospective training and validation of ResNet.基于深度学习的 MRI 脊柱骨折诊断方法:ResNet 的回顾性训练和验证
Eur Spine J. 2022 Aug;31(8):2022-2030. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07121-1. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
3
Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions on DCE-MRI by Using Radiomics and Deep Learning With Consideration of Peritumor Tissue.基于瘤周组织考虑的放射组学和深度学习在 DCE-MRI 上对乳腺良恶性病变的诊断。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Mar;51(3):798-809. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26981. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
4
Benign vs malignant vertebral compression fractures with MRI: a comparison between automatic deep learning network and radiologist's assessment.MRI 鉴别良性与恶性椎体压缩性骨折:自动深度学习网络与放射科医生评估的比较。
Eur Radiol. 2023 Jul;33(7):5060-5068. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09713-x. Epub 2023 May 10.
5
Diagnosis of in vivo vertical root fracture using deep learning on cone-beam CT images.利用锥形束 CT 图像上的深度学习技术诊断活体中牙根纵裂。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 5;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02422-9.
6
Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures: Comparison and correlation of radiomics and deep learning frameworks based on spinal CT and clinical characteristics.基于脊柱 CT 和临床特征的放射组学和深度学习框架对良恶性椎体压缩性骨折的鉴别诊断:比较和相关性研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Aug;165:110899. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110899. Epub 2023 May 29.
7
Chest CT-based automated vertebral fracture assessment using artificial intelligence and morphologic features.基于人工智能和形态学特征的胸部 CT 自动椎体骨折评估。
Med Phys. 2024 Jun;51(6):4201-4218. doi: 10.1002/mp.17072. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Comparison of MR imaging and FDG-PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures.磁共振成像与 FDG-PET/CT 在良恶性椎体压缩性骨折鉴别诊断中的比较。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2011 Feb;14(2):177-83. doi: 10.3171/2010.10.SPINE10175. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
9
Using deep learning to distinguish malignant from benign parotid tumors on plain computed tomography images.利用深度学习在计算机断层扫描平扫图像上区分腮腺恶性肿瘤和良性肿瘤。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;12:919088. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.919088. eCollection 2022.
10
Comprehensive comparison of dual-energy computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of bone marrow edema and fracture lines in acute vertebral fractures.双能 CT 与 MRI 对急性椎体骨折骨髓水肿及骨折线评估的全面比较。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jan;32(1):561-571. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08081-8. Epub 2021 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Current applications of deep learning in vertebral fracture diagnosis.深度学习在椎体骨折诊断中的当前应用。
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07604-z.
2
Performance Comparison of Machine Learning Using Radiomic Features and CNN-Based Deep Learning in Benign and Malignant Classification of Vertebral Compression Fractures Using CT Scans.基于CT扫描的机器学习利用影像组学特征与基于卷积神经网络的深度学习在椎体压缩性骨折良恶性分类中的性能比较
J Imaging Inform Med. 2025 Jun 2. doi: 10.1007/s10278-025-01553-z.
3
MRI-based 2.5D deep learning radiomics nomogram for the differentiation of benign versus malignant vertebral compression fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Opportunistic osteoporosis screening in multi-detector CT images using deep convolutional neural networks.利用深度卷积神经网络进行多探测器 CT 图像中的机会性骨质疏松症筛查。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Apr;31(4):1831-1842. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07312-8. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
2
Differentiation of usual vertebral compression fractures using CT histogram analysis as quantitative biomarkers: A proof-of-principle study.利用 CT 直方图分析对常见的椎体压缩性骨折进行鉴别:一项原理验证研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Oct;131:109264. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109264. Epub 2020 Sep 1.
3
Deep learning in fracture detection: a narrative review.
基于MRI的2.5D深度学习影像组学列线图用于鉴别良性与恶性椎体压缩性骨折
Front Oncol. 2025 May 14;15:1603672. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1603672. eCollection 2025.
4
Diagnostic model for distinguishing fresh or old osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures based on modified computed tomography window: a retrospective cohort study.基于改良计算机断层扫描窗区分新鲜或陈旧性骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折的诊断模型:一项回顾性队列研究
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08923-9.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: Imaging-Based Applications for Diagnosis and Surgical Techniques.脊柱外科中的人工智能:基于影像的诊断与手术技术应用
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2025 Oct;18(10):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s12178-025-09972-9. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
6
The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery: A Scoping Review.人工智能在脊柱外科手术中的应用:一项范围综述。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Apr 10;9(4). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00405. eCollection 2025 Apr 1.
7
Deep learning for the detection of moyamoya angiopathy using T2-weighted images: a multicenter study.使用T2加权图像的深度学习检测烟雾病血管病变:一项多中心研究。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):1346-1357. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1269. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
8
Deep learning-assisted screening and diagnosis of scoliosis: segmentation of bare-back images via an attention-enhanced convolutional neural network.深度学习辅助脊柱侧弯的筛查与诊断:通过注意力增强卷积神经网络对裸背图像进行分割
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 14;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05564-y.
9
Enhanced Detection Performance of Acute Vertebral Compression Fractures Using a Hybrid Deep Learning and Traditional Quantitative Measurement Approach: Beyond the Limitations of Genant Classification.使用深度学习与传统定量测量相结合的方法提高急性椎体压缩骨折的检测性能:突破Genant分类的局限性
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 Jan 13;12(1):64. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12010064.
10
Deep Learning for Discrimination of Early Spinal Tuberculosis from Acute Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture on CT.基于CT的深度学习用于鉴别早期脊柱结核与急性骨质疏松性椎体骨折
Infect Drug Resist. 2025 Jan 3;18:31-42. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S482584. eCollection 2025.
深度学习在骨折检测中的应用:综述。
Acta Orthop. 2020 Apr;91(2):215-220. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1711323. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
4
Deep learning predicts hip fracture using confounding patient and healthcare variables.深度学习利用混杂的患者和医疗保健变量预测髋部骨折。
NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Apr 30;2:31. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0105-1. eCollection 2019.
5
Artificial intelligence detection of distal radius fractures: a comparison between the convolutional neural network and professional assessments.人工智能检测桡骨远端骨折:卷积神经网络与专业评估的比较。
Acta Orthop. 2019 Aug;90(4):394-400. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2019.1600125. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
6
Deep learning and SURF for automated classification and detection of calcaneus fractures in CT images.深度学习和 SURF 用于 CT 图像中跟骨骨折的自动分类和检测。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Apr;171:27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
7
Deep neural networks for automatic detection of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on CT scans.基于深度学习的 CT 扫描中骨质疏松性椎体骨折自动检测方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2018 Jul 1;98:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 8.
8
Automated detection and classification of the proximal humerus fracture by using deep learning algorithm.基于深度学习算法的肱骨近端骨折自动检测与分类。
Acta Orthop. 2018 Aug;89(4):468-473. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2018.1453714. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
9
Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks.骨折检测中的人工智能:基于深度卷积神经网络的迁移学习
Clin Radiol. 2018 May;73(5):439-445. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
10
Deep Learning for Classification of Colorectal Polyps on Whole-slide Images.基于全切片图像的深度学习用于结直肠息肉分类
J Pathol Inform. 2017 Jul 25;8:30. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_34_17. eCollection 2017.