Suppr超能文献

慢性颈痛患者颈部伯恩茅斯问卷土耳其语版:文化调适、信效度研究

The Turkish version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain: a cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity study.

作者信息

Telci Emine Aslan, Aslan Ummuhan Bas, Yagci Nesrin, Cavlak Ugur, Kabul Elif Gur, Kara Guzin, Kose Tugce, Yarar Feride, Karahan Sevilay, Atalay Orcin Telli

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Avrasya University, Trabzon, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Med Sci. 2019 Oct 23;17(3):708-713. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89322. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The cultural adaptation of a self-report measurement in different languages is important for developing common strategies for evaluation and treatment. The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ), which was developed to evaluate patients with neck pain, was adapted from the Bournemouth Questionnaire in accordance with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) categories. The aim of this study was to conduct the Turkish cultural adaptation, validity and reliability study of the NBQ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 119 patients (93 females, 26 males; mean age: 37.2 ±11.8 years) with chronic nonspecific neck pain. The NBQ, Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) questionnaires were administered to all the subjects. Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) and the internal consistency (Cronbach's α) were the methods used for the reliability study. The relationship between NBQ, NDI and NHP was investigated for concurrent validity. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used for construct validity.

RESULTS

The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire showed good internal consistency (α = 0.87). The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.913 (95% CI: 0.875-0.940). The correlations between NBQ and NDI and NHP were significant ( < 0.05). The questionnaire was found to have one factor and the explained variance was 59.084% as a result of factor analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire is a valid and reliable scale for patients with chronic neck pain in the Turkish population.

摘要

引言

将自我报告测量工具进行不同语言的文化适应性调整,对于制定通用的评估和治疗策略至关重要。颈部伯恩茅斯问卷(NBQ)是为评估颈部疼痛患者而开发的,它是根据《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)类别从伯恩茅斯问卷改编而来。本研究的目的是对NBQ进行土耳其语文化适应性调整、有效性和可靠性研究。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了119例慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者(93例女性,26例男性;平均年龄:37.2±11.8岁)。对所有受试者发放了NBQ、颈部残疾指数(NDI)和诺丁汉健康量表(NHP)问卷。重测信度(组内相关系数)和内部一致性(克朗巴哈α系数)是用于可靠性研究的方法。研究了NBQ、NDI和NHP之间的关系以评估同时效度。探索性和验证性因素分析用于结构效度分析。

结果

颈部伯恩茅斯问卷显示出良好的内部一致性(α=0.87)。重测信度系数为0.913(95%可信区间:0.875 - 0.940)。NBQ与NDI和NHP之间的相关性显著(<0.05)。经因素分析,该问卷被发现有一个因素,解释方差为59.084%。

结论

颈部伯恩茅斯问卷对于土耳其人群中的慢性颈部疼痛患者是一个有效且可靠的量表。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验