• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Abbott PanBio 被世界卫生组织列为紧急使用清单,该检测试剂为一种快速、抗原检测的即时诊断检测试剂,用于 SARS-CoV-2-评估其准确性和易用性。

The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use.

机构信息

Division of Clinical Tropical Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Virology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0247918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247918. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0247918
PMID:34043631
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8158996/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Diagnostics are essential for controlling the pandemic. Identifying a reliable and fast diagnostic device is needed for effective testing. We assessed performance and ease-of-use of the Abbott PanBio antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT).

METHODS

This prospective, multi-centre diagnostic accuracy study enrolled at two sites in Germany. Following routine testing with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), a second study-exclusive swab was performed for Ag-RDT testing. Routine swabs were nasopharyngeal (NP) or combined NP/oropharyngeal (OP) whereas the study-exclusive swabs were NP. To evaluate performance, sensitivity and specificity were assessed overall and in predefined sub-analyses accordingly to cycle-threshold values, days after symptom onset, disease severity and study site. Additionally, an ease-of-use assessment (EoU) and System Usability Scale (SUS) were performed.

RESULTS

1108 participants were enrolled between Sept 28 and Oct 30, 2020. Of these, 106 (9.6%) were PCR-positive. The Abbott PanBio detected 92/106 PCR-positive participants with a sensitivity of 86.8% (95% CI: 79.0% - 92.0%) and a specificity of 99.9% (95% CI: 99.4%-100%). The sub-analyses indicated that sensitivity was 95.8% in Ct-values <25 and within the first seven days from symptom onset. The test was characterized as easy to use (SUS: 86/100) and considered suitable for point-of-care settings.

CONCLUSION

The Abbott PanBio Ag-RDT performs well for SARS-CoV-2 testing in this large manufacturer independent study, confirming its WHO recommendation for Emergency Use in settings with limited resources.

摘要

目的

诊断对于控制大流行至关重要。需要找到一种可靠且快速的诊断设备,以进行有效的检测。我们评估了 Abbott PanBio 抗原检测快速诊断检测(Ag-RDT)的性能和易用性。

方法

本前瞻性、多中心诊断准确性研究在德国的两个地点进行。在使用逆转录酶聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)进行常规检测后,进行了第二项仅限研究的拭子 Ag-RDT 检测。常规拭子为鼻咽(NP)或 NP/口咽(OP)联合拭子,而仅限研究的拭子为 NP。为了评估性能,我们根据循环阈值、症状出现后天数、疾病严重程度和研究地点,对总灵敏度和特异性进行了评估,并进行了亚组分析。此外,还进行了易用性评估(EoU)和系统可用性量表(SUS)评估。

结果

2020 年 9 月 28 日至 10 月 30 日期间,共纳入 1108 名参与者。其中,106 名(9.6%)PCR 阳性。Abbott PanBio 检测到 106 名 PCR 阳性者中的 92 名,其灵敏度为 86.8%(95%CI:79.0%-92.0%),特异性为 99.9%(95%CI:99.4%-100%)。亚组分析表明,在 Ct 值<25 和症状出现后 7 天内,灵敏度为 95.8%。该检测被认为易于使用(SUS:86/100),适合在资源有限的即时检测环境中使用。

结论

在这项大型独立制造商研究中,Abbott PanBio Ag-RDT 对 SARS-CoV-2 检测表现良好,证实了其在资源有限的环境下紧急使用的世界卫生组织推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/c11e33d73663/pone.0247918.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/663a24c17b74/pone.0247918.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/f116ac00ebd6/pone.0247918.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/c11e33d73663/pone.0247918.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/663a24c17b74/pone.0247918.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/f116ac00ebd6/pone.0247918.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7177/8158996/c11e33d73663/pone.0247918.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Abbott PanBio WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2-Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use. Abbott PanBio 被世界卫生组织列为紧急使用清单,该检测试剂为一种快速、抗原检测的即时诊断检测试剂,用于 SARS-CoV-2-评估其准确性和易用性。
PLoS One. 2021 May 27;16(5):e0247918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247918. eCollection 2021.
2
A Multicenter Clinical Diagnostic Accuracy Study of SureStatus, an Affordable, WHO Emergency Use-Listed, Rapid, Point-Of-Care Antigen-Detecting Diagnostic Test for SARS-CoV-2.一项关于 SureStatus 的多中心临床诊断准确性研究,SureStatus 是一种负担得起的、世界卫生组织紧急使用清单上列出的、快速的、即时抗原检测诊断 SARS-CoV-2 的诊断测试。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Oct 26;10(5):e0122922. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01229-22. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
3
Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests: A multi-centre clinical evaluation.七种即时 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测试剂盒的准确性和易用性:一项多中心临床评估。
EBioMedicine. 2022 Jan;75:103774. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103774. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
4
Head-to-head performance comparison of self-collected nasal versus professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab for a WHO-listed SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.自行采集的鼻腔拭子与专业采集的鼻咽拭子用于世界卫生组织清单上的 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速诊断检测的头对头性能比较。
Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021 Aug;210(4):181-186. doi: 10.1007/s00430-021-00710-9. Epub 2021 May 24.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of Panbio rapid antigen tests on oropharyngeal swabs for detection of SARS-CoV-2.用于检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的Panbio快速抗原检测对咽拭子的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 24;16(6):e0253321. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253321. eCollection 2021.
6
Comparison between Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection in an Asymptomatic Population, and Direct Confirmation by RT-PCR from the Residual Buffer.鼻拭子和咽拭子在无症状人群中用于 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的比较,以及从剩余缓冲液中用 RT-PCR 直接确认。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0245521. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02455-21. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
7
Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19.雅培 Panbio 试剂在有症状的 COVID-19 个体的鼻咽、咽喉和唾液拭子中的临床性能。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;40(8):1721-1726. doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04202-9. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
8
Detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the general population by three prevailing rapid antigen tests: cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.三种常用的快速抗原检测试剂盒在普通人群中检测 SARS-CoV-2 感染的横断面诊断准确性研究。
BMC Med. 2022 Feb 24;20(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02300-9.
9
SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test sensitivity and viral load in newly symptomatic hospital employees in Berlin, Germany, December, 2020 to February, 2022: an observational study.2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月期间德国柏林新出现症状的住院员工中 SARS-CoV-2 快速抗原检测的敏感性和病毒载量:一项观察性研究。
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Jun;5(6):e538-e546. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00412-3. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Diagnostic performance of CerTest and Panbio antigen rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于诊断 SARS-CoV-2 感染的 CerTest 和 Panbio 抗原快速诊断检测的诊断性能。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Apr;137:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104781. Epub 2021 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence and associated factors of COVID-19 among biomedical science students of Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria: a cross-sectional study.尼日利亚哈科特港河流州立大学生物医学专业学生中新冠病毒病的患病率及相关因素:一项横断面研究
Porto Biomed J. 2025 Mar 18;10(2):e283. doi: 10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000283. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
2
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests for COVID-19 compared to the viral genetic test in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 快速抗原检测与成人病毒基因检测的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Oct 1;22(10):1939-2002. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-23-00291.
3

本文引用的文献

1
From more testing to smart testing: data-guided SARS-CoV-2 testing choices, the Netherlands, May to September 2020.从更多检测到更智能的检测:数据指导的 SARS-CoV-2 检测选择,荷兰,2020 年 5 月至 9 月。
Euro Surveill. 2022 Feb;27(8). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.8.2100702.
2
Diagnostic accuracy of two commercial SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid tests at the point of care in community-based testing centers.两种商业 SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速检测试剂在社区检测中心现场即时检测中的诊断准确性。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 31;16(3):e0248921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248921. eCollection 2021.
3
SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, and MERS-CoV viral load dynamics, duration of viral shedding, and infectiousness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Testing for SARS-CoV-2: lessons learned and current use cases.
SARS-CoV-2 检测:经验教训和当前应用案例。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2024 Jun 13;37(2):e0007223. doi: 10.1128/cmr.00072-23. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
4
The diagnostic performance evaluation of Panbio and STANDARD Q coronavirus disease 2019 antigen tests against real-time polymerase chain reaction in southern Ethiopia.在埃塞俄比亚南部,用 Panbio 和 STANDARD Q 新冠病毒 2019 抗原检测与实时聚合酶链反应进行诊断性能评估。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 24;14(1):4556. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55309-w.
5
Integration of serial self-testing for COVID-19 as part of contact tracing in the Brazilian public health system: A pragmatic trial protocol.将新冠病毒连续自我检测整合到巴西公共卫生系统的接触者追踪中:一项实用试验方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 4;18(10):e0284659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284659. eCollection 2023.
6
The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs.新常态:与症状出现相比,SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量延迟达到峰值,对 COVID-19 检测计划的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Feb 17;78(2):301-307. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad582.
7
Usability of a novel lateral flow assay for the point-of-care detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: A qualitative time-series assessment among healthcare workers in South Africa.新型侧向流动检测法在即时检测淋病奈瑟菌中的应用:南非医护人员定性时间序列评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 2;18(6):e0286666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286666. eCollection 2023.
8
The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs.新常态:严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)病毒载量相对于症状出现的延迟峰值及其对2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)检测计划的影响
medRxiv. 2023 May 10:2023.05.09.23289735. doi: 10.1101/2023.05.09.23289735.
9
The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Antigen Testing (January 2023).美国传染病学会关于 COVID-19 诊断的指南:抗原检测(2023 年 1 月)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jun 27;78(7):e350-e384. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad032.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio COVID-19 antigen rapid test device for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Kenya, 2021: A field evaluation.2021 年肯尼亚 Panbio COVID-19 抗原快速检测设备对 SARS-CoV-2 检测的诊断准确性:现场评估。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 25;18(1):e0277657. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277657. eCollection 2023.
SARS-CoV-2、SARS-CoV 和 MERS-CoV 的病毒载量动态、病毒脱落持续时间和传染性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Microbe. 2021 Jan;2(1):e13-e22. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30172-5. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
4
Real-life validation of the Panbio™ COVID-19 antigen rapid test (Abbott) in community-dwelling subjects with symptoms of potential SARS-CoV-2 infection.Panbio™ COVID-19抗原快速检测(雅培公司)在有潜在SARS-CoV-2感染症状的社区居民中的实际应用验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan;31:100677. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100677. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
5
Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.唾液、咽拭子和鼻拭子用于 SARS-CoV-2 分子检测的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Apr 20;59(5). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02881-20.
6
Analytical and clinical performance of the panbio COVID-19 antigen-detecting rapid diagnostic test.泛博生物新冠病毒抗原检测快速诊断测试的分析性能与临床性能
J Infect. 2021 May;82(5):186-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.12.033. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
7
Head-to-head comparison of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting rapid test with self-collected nasal swab professional-collected nasopharyngeal swab.SARS-CoV-2 抗原检测快速检测与自采鼻拭子和专业采集鼻咽拭子的头对头比较。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 15;57(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
8
Viral Cultures for Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infectivity Assessment: A Systematic Review.评估 2019 年冠状病毒病传染性的病毒培养:系统评价。
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 6;73(11):e3884-e3899. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1764.
9
Test sensitivity is secondary to frequency and turnaround time for COVID-19 screening.新冠病毒筛查时,检测敏感性次于检测频率和周转时间。
Sci Adv. 2021 Jan 1;7(1). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd5393. Print 2021 Jan.
10
Evaluating the clinical utility and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in relation to RT-PCR Ct values.评估严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)抗原检测相对于逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)Ct值的临床效用和敏感性。
Infection. 2021 Jun;49(3):555-557. doi: 10.1007/s15010-020-01542-0. Epub 2020 Nov 13.