• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生物陶瓷封闭剂与AH-Plus对牙本质小管的渗透及适应性:扫描电镜比较评估

Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Adaptation of Bio-C Sealer and AH-Plus: A Comparative SEM Evaluation.

作者信息

Caceres Carolina, Larrain María Rosa, Monsalve Macarena, Peña Bengoa Fernando

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile.

Undergraduate Students, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Andres Bello, Viña del Mar, Chile.

出版信息

Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr 22;6(2):216-20. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.96658.

DOI:10.14744/eej.2020.96658
PMID:34047295
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8461482/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the dentinal tubule penetration and adaptation of a premixed bioceramic sealer and an epoxy-resin based sealer in the three radicular thirds.

METHODS

30 wide roots, with single straight canals and totally formed apexes, were endodontically prepared and divided into two groups (n=14) according to the sealer used for root canal filling: AH-Plus (AHP) and Bio-C Sealer (BIOC). Two samples were left as controls. After the canals were filled, the samples were cut and viewed under Scanning Electron Microscopy by taking images to analyse the tubular penetration and adaptation of the sealers. The results were statistically analysed with the Shapiro Wilk, Levene and Mann-Whitney tests (P<0.05).

RESULTS

BIOC showed significantly higher penetration in dentinal tubules than AHP in the cervical, middle and apical thirds of the root canal (P<0.05) and better adaptation to the dentinal tubule walls.

CONCLUSION

Under the parameters of this study, BIOC exhibits higher penetration and better adaptation to the dentinal tubules compared to AHP.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较和评估预混生物陶瓷封闭剂和环氧树脂基封闭剂在根管三个根尖段的牙本质小管渗透及适应性。

方法

选取30颗具有单一直根管且根尖完全形成的宽大牙根,进行根管预备,并根据用于根管充填的封闭剂分为两组(n = 14):AH-Plus(AHP)组和Bio-C封闭剂(BIOC)组。留两个样本作为对照。根管充填后,将样本切开,在扫描电子显微镜下观察并拍照,以分析封闭剂的小管渗透及适应性。结果采用Shapiro Wilk、Levene和Mann-Whitney检验进行统计学分析(P<0.05)。

结果

在根管的颈段、中段和根尖段,BIOC在牙本质小管中的渗透显著高于AHP(P<0.05),并且对牙本质小管壁的适应性更好。

结论

在本研究参数下,与AHP相比,BIOC对牙本质小管具有更高的渗透性和更好的适应性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/11b8288ada6c/EEj-6-216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/1347b8c27402/EEj-6-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/d345a7aa7cda/EEj-6-216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/7f5f10fec5fd/EEj-6-216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/11b8288ada6c/EEj-6-216-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/1347b8c27402/EEj-6-216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/d345a7aa7cda/EEj-6-216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/7f5f10fec5fd/EEj-6-216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3b13/8461482/11b8288ada6c/EEj-6-216-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Adaptation of Bio-C Sealer and AH-Plus: A Comparative SEM Evaluation.生物陶瓷封闭剂与AH-Plus对牙本质小管的渗透及适应性:扫描电镜比较评估
Eur Endod J. 2021 Apr 22;6(2):216-20. doi: 10.14744/eej.2020.96658.
2
Lack of Correlation Between the Penetration of Two Types of Sealers and Interfacial Adaptation to Root Dentine.两种密封剂渗透性与牙本质界面适应性之间缺乏相关性。
Eur Endod J. 2022 Jun;7(2):150-155. doi: 10.14744/eej.2022.06025.
3
A confocal laser scanning microscopic evaluation of nonthermal atmospheric plasma on the dentinal tubule penetration of bioceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.非热大气等离子体对生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透作用的共聚焦激光扫描显微镜评估
J Conserv Dent. 2023 May-Jun;26(3):265-270. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_22_23. Epub 2023 May 16.
4
The Effect of Primary Root Canal Treatment on Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Calcium Silicate-based Sealers during Endodontic Retreatment.根管再治疗期间一次根管治疗对硅酸钙类封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响
J Endod. 2022 Sep;48(9):1169-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2022.05.008. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
5
Minimal Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Endodontic Sealers in Warm Vertical Compaction by Direct Detection via SEM Analysis.通过扫描电子显微镜分析直接检测热垂直加压时根管封闭剂的最小牙本质小管渗透情况
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4440. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194440.
6
Effect of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing on the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of 2 Different Root Canal Sealers: A Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopic Study.氢氧化钙对 2 种不同根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的影响:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2018 Jun;44(6):1018-1023. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
7
Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration of Epiphany in severely curved root canals.严重弯曲根管中Epiphany对牙本质小管渗透的扫描电子显微镜评估
Eur J Dent. 2013 Oct;7(4):423-428. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.120673.
8
Sealer penetration and adaptation in the dentinal tubules: a scanning electron microscopic study.牙本质小管内的封闭剂渗透和适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Endod. 2011 Nov;37(11):1576-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.07.005. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
9
The effect of final irrigation on the penetrability of an epoxy resin-based sealer into dentinal tubules: a confocal microscopy study.最终冲洗对环氧树脂类封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦显微镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Jan;20(1):117-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1474-8. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
10
Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of new injectable hydraulic calcium disilicate based root canal sealer: A single blinded in vitro study.新型可注射水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透及推出粘结强度的比较评价:一项单盲体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of a Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer nRoot SP Using Different Obturation Techniques.使用不同充填技术评估硅酸钙基根管封闭剂nRoot SP的根尖封闭能力
Int Dent J. 2025 Jul 23;75(5):100916. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100916.
2
Evaluation of the tubular penetration of two different types of nanoparticle root canal sealers over apically separated files: a scanning electron microscopic study (in vitro study).两种不同类型的纳米颗粒根管封闭剂在根尖分离锉上的根管渗透评估:一项扫描电子显微镜研究(体外研究)。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):887. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06263-0.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of ultrasonic cleaning on the bond strength of fiber posts in oval canals filled with a premixed bioceramic root canal sealer.超声清洁对充满预混生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的椭圆形根管中纤维桩粘结强度的影响。
Restor Dent Endod. 2020 Feb 20;45(2):e19. doi: 10.5395/rde.2020.45.e19. eCollection 2020 May.
2
A Scanning Electron Microscope Analysis of Sealing Potential and Marginal Adaptation of Different Root Canal Sealers to Dentin: An study.不同根管封闭剂对牙本质的封闭潜力和边缘适应性的扫描电子显微镜分析:一项研究。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):73-77.
3
Dentinal Tubule Penetration and Retreatability of a Calcium Silicate-based Sealer Tested in Bulk or with Different Main Core Material.
Comparative Micro-CT Evaluation of Dentinal Tubule Penetration of BIO-C and AH Plus Jet Root Canal Sealer Using Three Intra-Canal Activation Techniques.
使用三种根管内激活技术对BIO-C和AH Plus Jet根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透的比较显微CT评估
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 5):S4568-S4571. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1242_24. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
Endodontic Treatment of an Upper Lateral Incisor with Oehlers' Type II Dens Invaginatus: A Case Report.伴有奥勒斯Ⅱ型牙内陷的上颌侧切牙的根管治疗:一例报告
Iran Endod J. 2025;20(1):e7. doi: 10.22037/iej.v20i1.46131. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
5
Dentinal tubular penetration ability of epoxy resin-based and bioceramic-based root canal sealers.基于环氧树脂和生物陶瓷的根管封闭剂的牙本质小管渗透能力。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):1506. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05311-5.
6
Comparison of Different Obturation Techniques in the Dentinal Tubule Penetration of EndoSequence® Bioceramic Sealer HiFlow™: An In-Vitro Study.不同封闭技术在内填式EndoSequence®生物陶瓷封闭剂HiFlow™牙本质小管渗透中的比较:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 9;16(10):e71155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71155. eCollection 2024 Oct.
7
The impact of the filling technique with two sealers in bulk or associated with gutta-percha on the fatigue behavior and failure patterns of endodontically treated teeth.两种根管封闭剂(或联合牙胶)的侧向加压充填技术对根管治疗后牙疲劳性能和破坏模式的影响。
PeerJ. 2024 Oct 28;12:e18221. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18221. eCollection 2024.
8
Evaluation of cytotoxicity and adaptability of a novel bioceramic root canal sealer: An and scanning electron microscope study.新型生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和适应性评估:一项[具体研究内容未完整给出]及扫描电子显微镜研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):326-330. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_40_24. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
9
Influence of bioceramic sealers on dentinal tubule penetration and antimicrobial effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.生物陶瓷封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透和抗菌效果的影响:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Odontology. 2024 Jul;112(3):672-699. doi: 10.1007/s10266-024-00904-6. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
10
Comparative evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration and push-out bond strength of new injectable hydraulic calcium disilicate based root canal sealer: A single blinded in vitro study.新型可注射水硬性硅酸钙基根管封闭剂牙本质小管渗透及推出粘结强度的比较评价:一项单盲体外研究。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 5.
以整块或不同主要核心材料测试的基于硅酸钙的密封剂的牙本质小管渗透和可退缩性。
J Endod. 2019 Aug;45(8):1036-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
4
Dentinal tubule penetration of AH Plus, BC Sealer and a novel tricalcium silicate sealer: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.AH Plus、BC 根管封闭剂和新型硅酸三钙根管封闭剂对牙本质小管渗透的比较:激光共聚焦扫描显微镜研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1871-1876. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2632-6. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
5
Interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of bioceramic endodontic sealers.生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的界面适应性和渗透深度。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;21(4):373-377. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_64_18.
6
Influence of ethanol on dentin roughness, surface free energy, and interaction between AH Plus and root dentin.乙醇对牙本质粗糙度、表面自由能及 AH Plus 与根管牙本质之间相互作用的影响。
Braz Oral Res. 2018;32:e33. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0033. Epub 2018 May 3.
7
The Tubular Penetration Depth and Adaption of Four Sealers: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study.四种封闭剂的管腔渗透深度和适应性:扫描电子显微镜研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2946524. doi: 10.1155/2017/2946524. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
8
In vitro study of dentinal tubule penetration and filling quality of bioceramic sealer.生物陶瓷封闭剂牙本质小管渗透及充填质量的体外研究
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0192248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192248. eCollection 2018.
9
Effect of different endodontic sealers and time of cementation on push-out bond strength of fiber posts.不同根管封闭剂及黏固时间对纤维桩推出强度的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Apr;22(3):1403-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2230-z. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
10
Evaluation of the physicochemical properties of silicone- and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.基于硅酮和环氧树脂的根管封闭剂的物理化学性质评估。
Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 21;31:e72. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0072.